Skip to main content
Cornell University
Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1410.8215

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Logic in Computer Science

arXiv:1410.8215 (cs)
[Submitted on 30 Oct 2014]

Title:How to Put Usability into Focus: Using Focus Groups to Evaluate the Usability of Interactive Theorem Provers

Authors:Bernhard Beckert (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)), Sarah Grebing (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)), Florian Böhl (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT))
View a PDF of the paper titled How to Put Usability into Focus: Using Focus Groups to Evaluate the Usability of Interactive Theorem Provers, by Bernhard Beckert (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:In recent years the effectiveness of interactive theorem provers has increased to an extent that the bottleneck in the interactive process shifted to efficiency: while in principle large and complex theorems are provable (effectiveness), it takes a lot of effort for the user interacting with the system (lack of efficiency). We conducted focus groups to evaluate the usability of Isabelle/HOL and the KeY system with two goals: (a) detect usability issues in the interaction between interactive theorem provers and their user, and (b) analyze how evaluation and survey methods commonly used in the area of human-computer interaction, such as focus groups and co-operative evaluation, are applicable to the specific field of interactive theorem proving (ITP).
In this paper, we report on our experience using the evaluation method focus groups and how we adapted this method to ITP. We describe our results and conclusions mainly on the "meta-level," i.e., we focus on the impact that specific characteristics of ITPs have on the setup and the results of focus groups. On the concrete level, we briefly summarise insights into the usability of the ITPs used in our case study.
Comments: In Proceedings UITP 2014, arXiv:1410.7850
Subjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
Cite as: arXiv:1410.8215 [cs.LO]
  (or arXiv:1410.8215v1 [cs.LO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1410.8215
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: EPTCS 167, 2014, pp. 4-13
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.167.3
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: EPTCS [view email] [via EPTCS proxy]
[v1] Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:07:02 UTC (17 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled How to Put Usability into Focus: Using Focus Groups to Evaluate the Usability of Interactive Theorem Provers, by Bernhard Beckert (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2014-10
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.HC

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status