Skip to main content
Cornell University
Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1801.00194

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Networking and Internet Architecture

arXiv:1801.00194 (cs)
[Submitted on 30 Dec 2017]

Title:Maximum Throughput of Multiple Access Channels in Adversarial Environments

Authors:Bogdan S. Chlebus, Dariusz R. Kowalski, Mariusz A. Rokicki
View a PDF of the paper titled Maximum Throughput of Multiple Access Channels in Adversarial Environments, by Bogdan S. Chlebus and Dariusz R. Kowalski and Mariusz A. Rokicki
View PDF
Abstract:We consider deterministic distributed broadcasting on multiple access channels in the framework of adversarial queuing. Packets are injected dynamically by an adversary that is constrained by the injection rate and the number of packets that may be injected simultaneously; the latter we call burstiness. The maximum injection rate that an algorithm can handle in a stable manner is called the throughput of the algorithm. We develop an algorithm that achieves throughput $1$ for any number of stations against leaky-bucket adversaries. The algorithm has $O(n^2+\text{burstiness})$ packets queued simultaneously at any time, where $n$ is the number of stations; this upper bound is proved to be best possible. An algorithm is called fair when each packet is eventually broadcast. We show that no algorithm can be both stable and fair for a system of at least two stations against leaky-bucket adversaries. We study in detail small systems of exactly two and three stations against window adversaries to exhibit differences in quality of broadcast among classes of algorithms. For two stations, we show that fair latency can be achieved by a full sensing algorithm, while there is no stable acknowledgment based algorithm. For three stations, we show that fair latency can be achieved by a general algorithm, while no full sensing algorithm can be stable. Finally, we show that algorithms that either are fair or do not have the queue sizes affect the order of transmissions cannot be stable in systems of at least four stations against window adversaries.
Subjects: Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI)
Cite as: arXiv:1801.00194 [cs.NI]
  (or arXiv:1801.00194v1 [cs.NI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.00194
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Distributed Computing 22 (2), pp. 93 - 116, 2009
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-009-0086-4
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Bogdan Chlebus [view email]
[v1] Sat, 30 Dec 2017 21:14:25 UTC (38 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Maximum Throughput of Multiple Access Channels in Adversarial Environments, by Bogdan S. Chlebus and Dariusz R. Kowalski and Mariusz A. Rokicki
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

cs.NI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-01
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Bogdan S. Chlebus
Dariusz R. Kowalski
Mariusz A. Rokicki
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status