Skip to main content
Cornell University
Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1911.01559

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:1911.01559 (cs)
[Submitted on 5 Nov 2019 (v1), last revised 21 Nov 2020 (this version, v3)]

Title:A Tale of Evil Twins: Adversarial Inputs versus Poisoned Models

Authors:Ren Pang, Hua Shen, Xinyang Zhang, Shouling Ji, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, Xiapu Luo, Alex Liu, Ting Wang
View a PDF of the paper titled A Tale of Evil Twins: Adversarial Inputs versus Poisoned Models, by Ren Pang and 7 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Despite their tremendous success in a range of domains, deep learning systems are inherently susceptible to two types of manipulations: adversarial inputs -- maliciously crafted samples that deceive target deep neural network (DNN) models, and poisoned models -- adversely forged DNNs that misbehave on pre-defined inputs. While prior work has intensively studied the two attack vectors in parallel, there is still a lack of understanding about their fundamental connections: what are the dynamic interactions between the two attack vectors? what are the implications of such interactions for optimizing existing attacks? what are the potential countermeasures against the enhanced attacks? Answering these key questions is crucial for assessing and mitigating the holistic vulnerabilities of DNNs deployed in realistic settings.
Here we take a solid step towards this goal by conducting the first systematic study of the two attack vectors within a unified framework. Specifically, (i) we develop a new attack model that jointly optimizes adversarial inputs and poisoned models; (ii) with both analytical and empirical evidence, we reveal that there exist intriguing "mutual reinforcement" effects between the two attack vectors -- leveraging one vector significantly amplifies the effectiveness of the other; (iii) we demonstrate that such effects enable a large design spectrum for the adversary to enhance the existing attacks that exploit both vectors (e.g., backdoor attacks), such as maximizing the attack evasiveness with respect to various detection methods; (iv) finally, we discuss potential countermeasures against such optimized attacks and their technical challenges, pointing to several promising research directions.
Comments: Accepted as a full paper at ACM CCS 2020
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1911.01559 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:1911.01559v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1911.01559
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3372297.3417253
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Ren Pang [view email]
[v1] Tue, 5 Nov 2019 01:32:57 UTC (2,598 KB)
[v2] Fri, 15 May 2020 22:14:26 UTC (5,178 KB)
[v3] Sat, 21 Nov 2020 04:54:13 UTC (4,718 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Tale of Evil Twins: Adversarial Inputs versus Poisoned Models, by Ren Pang and 7 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-11
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CR
stat
stat.ML

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Xinyang Zhang
Shouling Ji
Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
Xiapu Luo
Ting Wang
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status