Skip to main content
Cornell University
Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1911.02534

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computational Complexity

arXiv:1911.02534 (cs)
[Submitted on 6 Nov 2019]

Title:Variety Membership Testing, Algebraic Natural Proofs, and Geometric Complexity Theory

Authors:Markus Bläser, Christian Ikenmeyer, Vladimir Lysikov, Anurag Pandey, Frank-Olaf Schreyer
View a PDF of the paper titled Variety Membership Testing, Algebraic Natural Proofs, and Geometric Complexity Theory, by Markus Bl\"aser and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We study the variety membership testing problem in the case when the variety is given as an orbit closure and the ambient space is the set of all 3-tensors. The first variety that we consider is the slice rank variety, which consists of all 3-tensors of slice rank at most $r$. We show that the membership testing problem for the slice rank variety is $\NP$-hard. While the slice rank variety is a union of orbit closures, we define another variety, the minrank variety, expressible as a single orbit closure. Our next result is the $\NP$-hardness of membership testing in the minrank variety, hence we establish the $\NP$-hardness of the orbit closure containment problem for 3-tensors.
Algebraic natural proofs were recently introduced by Forbes, Shpilka and Volk and independently by Grochow, Kumar, Saks and Saraf. Bläser et al. gave a version of an algebraic natural proof barrier for the matrix completion problem which relies on $\coNP \subseteq \exists \BPP$. It implied that constructing equations for the corresponding variety should be hard. We generalize their approach to work with any family of varieties for which the membership problem is $\NP$-hard and for which we can efficiently generate a dense subset. Therefore, a similar barrier holds for the slice rank and the minrank varieties, too. This allows us to set up the slice rank and the minrank varieties as a test-bed for geometric complexity theory (GCT). We determine the stabilizers of the tensors that generate the orbit closures of the two varieties and prove that these tensors are almost characterized by their symmetries. We prove several nontrivial equations for both the varieties using different GCT methods. Many equations also work in the regime where membership testing in the slice rank or minrank varieties is $\NP$-hard. We view this as a promising sign that the GCT approach might indeed be successful.
Subjects: Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Algebraic Geometry (math.AG); Representation Theory (math.RT)
Cite as: arXiv:1911.02534 [cs.CC]
  (or arXiv:1911.02534v1 [cs.CC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1911.02534
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Anurag Pandey [view email]
[v1] Wed, 6 Nov 2019 18:14:02 UTC (68 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Variety Membership Testing, Algebraic Natural Proofs, and Geometric Complexity Theory, by Markus Bl\"aser and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

cs.CC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-11
Change to browse by:
cs
math
math.AG
math.RT

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Markus Bläser
Christian Ikenmeyer
Vladimir Lysikov
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status