Abstract
Purpose
Premenopausal, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients should receive tamoxifen for at least 5 years, but many prematurely discontinue. Activation, transport, and deactivation of tamoxifen and its metabolites are controlled by proteins encoded by genes with functional variations. We examined the impact of genetic polymorphisms in the tamoxifen pathway on early treatment discontinuation.
Methods
We included premenopausal women diagnosed with ER-positive breast cancer (2002–2011) in Denmark who initiated tamoxifen. We genotyped 26 genetic variants in 15 enzymes involved in tamoxifen metabolism. Early discontinuation was defined as tamoxifen use for < 5 years. We estimated individual and combined effects of genetic variants using a Bayesian pathway approach. We report Bayes Factors (BF), wherein values > 1 indicate support of an effect of the genetic pathway on discontinuation (compared with no effect).
Results
Among 3,729 patients, 536 (14%) discontinued tamoxifen within 5 years. Genetic variants involved in tamoxifen activation impacted early discontinuation (BF = 7.5), in a manner driven almost entirely by CYP2D6 activity (BF = 22.6). Several variants in CYP2D6 and transporter genes synergistically increased the hazard of early discontinuation (e.g., CYP2D6*2 and ABCC2; BF = 138).
Conclusions
Variants in enzymes responsible for activating tamoxifen metabolites—particularly within CYP2D6—influence early tamoxifen discontinuation. CYP2D6 variants synergistically interact with transporter gene variants, namely ABCC2, to further raise the risk of discontinuation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Approximately 70% of premenopausal breast cancer patients have estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ER +) tumors [1]. Guideline care for these women includes at least 5 years of tamoxifen, which roughly halves recurrence risk [2]. The administered form of tamoxifen is metabolized into more active metabolites with higher ER affinity (i.e., 4-hydroxy tamoxifen [4-OH TAM], N-desmethyl-tamoxifen [NDM-TAM], and 4-hydroxy-N-desmethyl-tamoxifen [endoxifen]) in phase I metabolism [3,4,5]. Transporter proteins facilitate the movement of these metabolites across cell membranes [6,7,8]. Phase II metabolic reactions produce excretable metabolites (tamoxifen glucuronides and sulfates) with little or no pharmacologic activity that are rapidly eliminated [9,10,11]. Several enzymes responsible for these reactions are encoded by genes with functional polymorphisms, which may interact and yield varying concentrations of active metabolites, thereby potentially modifying drug effectiveness (Fig. 1) [12]. We previously found that polymorphic genes encoding enzymes in phase I metabolism were associated with clinical response to adjuvant tamoxifen, as measured by recurrence [13].
Tamoxifen metabolic pathway. Abbreviations: 4-OH TAM, 4-hydroxy tamoxifen; NDM-TAM, N-desmethyl tamoxifen; TamG, tamoxifen glucuronide; TamS, tamoxifen sulfate; ER, estrogen receptor, Blue boxes represent the tamoxifen metabolites. White boxes represent the polymorphic genes encoding the enzymes responsible for the transitions between the metabolites and the estrogen receptor signal (denoted by the arrows). Figure adapted from Baurley et al., [27] and Ahern et al., [13].
Women treated with tamoxifen experience different clinical outcomes, and have varying tolerability to the drug. Our study showed that about 22% of premenopausal breast cancer patients in Denmark prematurely discontinued endocrine therapy [14]. Discontinuation was associated with higher risk of recurrence compared with completion of treatment (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.25, 2.14) [14]. Lower cancer stage, no chemotherapy, greater comorbidity burden, and lower social support are associated with poorer adherence to endocrine therapy over time [15, 16]. Understanding the myriad of factors influencing adherence to endocrine therapy is critical for designing interventions to prevent recurrence and optimize survival.
Genetic differences in tamoxifen metabolism may also modify treatment adherence. Tamoxifen has many adverse effects, including depression and hot flashes, which impact treatment adherence [17]. Higher serum endoxifen levels are associated with more severe adverse effects [18,19,20]. Most prior research has focused on variants in CYP2D6 genes [3]. Reduced CYP2D6 activity from such variants is associated with lower endoxifen concentrations, potentially reducing tamoxifen effectiveness, while increasing the likelihood of treatment adherence [3, 18, 21]. Few studies have specifically investigated tamoxifen discontinuation—a potential indicator of clinical response—as an endpoint. A Swedish study found that CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers were more likely to prematurely discontinue tamoxifen [22]. Compared with normal metabolizers, poor and ultrarapid metabolizers had excess breast cancer mortality [22]. This finding emphasizes the need for further research on gene-induced modifications associated with tamoxifen discontinuation. Given the complexity of tamoxifen metabolism, multiple enzymes and transporters contribute to its activation and clearance, making it challenging to isolate the impact of individual genes. Single-enzyme analyses may oversimplify the pharmacokinetic processes involved, but conventional epidemiologic approaches often struggle to capture the many interactions within metabolic pathways.
Here, we used a Bayesian pathway modeling approach to investigate whether genetic variant interactions within key enzymes and transporters known to be involved in tamoxifen metabolism—including CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP2C19, and efflux and uptake transporters—might influence treatment discontinuation rates among a cohort of premenopausal women with breast cancer.
Methods
Study population
The Predictors of Breast Cancer Recurrence cohort (ProBe CaRe) includes all premenopausal women diagnosed with stage I–III breast cancer from 2002 to 2011 in Denmark who were registered with the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) [23]. This study involved ER + ProBe CaRe participants who initiated adjuvant tamoxifen and had genetic data previously collected from available tumor tissue blocks (86% of the entire cohort) [23]. Approval for this study was granted by the Regional Ethics Committee of Central Denmark (journal number 1–10-72–22-13), the Danish Breast Cancer Group, and the Danish Data Protection Agency (Aarhus University number 2016–051-000001, #458) and adhered to the General Data Protection Regulation.
Genetic polymorphisms in tamoxifen metabolism
We considered functional polymorphisms in key phase I, phase II, and transporter genes (Supplementary Figure S1 A-C) with minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 5% that were genotyped in an earlier analysis [13]. In brief, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue blocks were collected from treating hospitals and used to obtain DNA for genotyping. More information on this is outlined in our previous publication [13]. For each polymorphism in the 15 enzymes, individuals were characterized as having two, one, or no functional alleles. In the case of missing genetic data for individual variants, we imputed 50 datasets based on patient and tumor characteristics, as well as observed genotypes at other loci (Supplementary Figure S2) [13]. We then aggregated all datasets into one complete dataset for analysis. Several variants (rs1048943, rs28371706, rs1042157, rs1801030, rs10248420, and rs2231164) were excluded from the analyses because of meaningful departure from expected frequencies under Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium or because of poor minor allele amplification [13, 24].
Tamoxifen discontinuation
Patients with breast cancer in Denmark are invited to follow DBCG protocols, which for ER + women diagnosed during the time period of our cohort involved biannual follow-up visits with the treating oncologist [25]. At these visits, women reported whether they were still taking tamoxifen. On average, women continuing treatment received a 6-month resupply of tamoxifen directly from their treating oncologist, and not at a pharmacy like in other healthcare settings. We created supply diaries using this information from the DBCG for each patient, starting from the first registration of tamoxifen (i.e., initiation) and spanning 5 years after diagnosis. The diaries allowed for carry-over of up to 6 months of medication if tamoxifen was resupplied before the previous supply was exhausted. Supply diaries were censored at death, recurrence, first registration of an aromatase inhibitor (indicating transition to menopause), emigration, or 5 years after diagnosis. Using this information from the diaries, we defined early discontinuation as having ≥ 182 consecutive days (i.e., 6 months) with no available tamoxifen. We then considered the date of discontinuation as the 182nd consecutive day of no available tamoxifen. Time to discontinuation was calculated as the time between tamoxifen initiation and the date of discontinuation.
Statistical analysis
We calculated frequencies and proportions of the included patients according to clinical and demographic characteristics. We fit conventional Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) associating individual genetic variants with early tamoxifen discontinuation. To account for multiple comparisons, we also applied empirical Bayes shrinkage without setting a prior [26]. In these models, the genetic variant was treated numerically, so that the HR represented the increase in tamoxifen discontinuation hazard for every unit increase in the number of minor alleles. The covariates included in the models were age at diagnosis (years), UICC pathologic stage (I/II/III), surgery type (mastectomy/lumpectomy), receipt of radiotherapy (yes/no), receipt of chemotherapy (yes/no), histologic grade (I/II/III/not graded), HER2 status (negative/positive/unknown or not measured), cohabitation status (cohabiting/living alone), and employment status at diagnosis (employed/not working).
To evaluate the likelihood of early tamoxifen discontinuation according to the complex network of metabolic and transporter genetic variants, we used the Algorithm for Learning Pathway Structures (ALPS) [27, 28]. As previously demonstrated, ALPS characterizes the effects of individual genes, gene combinations, and pathway concepts on a given outcome by modeling multiplicative interactions between genetic variants [13, 27, 28]. Steps for running ALPS have been described elsewhere [27, 28] and are summarized below:
-
1.
Encode the prior: We codified the interrelationships among the 26 genetic variants in 15 enzymes involved in tamoxifen metabolism into a prior pathway (Fig. 1).
-
2.
Calculate prior probabilities: We ran ALPS for 3 million iterations without any genetic data (i.e., with only the prior pathway) to obtain prior probabilities, which were calculated by dividing the number of times in which a particular pathway feature (i.e., tree) was visited by the total number of iterations.
-
3.
Calculate posterior probabilities: We then ran ALPS for 1 million iterations, this time including complete data on genetic variants and time to discontinuation. ALPS finds a random spot in the prior pathway to begin a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) search. At each iteration, it proposes a change to the structure of the examined tree and computes the marginal likelihood of the posterior tree, which is accepted or rejected with Metropolis–Hastings probability before proceeding to the next iteration [28].
-
4.
Summarize results: We analyzed the trees accepted during the Metropolis–Hastings step, summarized information regarding the identified posterior trees, and calculated posterior probabilities. We then calculated Bayes Factors (BF) as the quotient of the posterior and prior odds for (A) individual variants, (B) pathway concepts (e.g., “phase I metabolism,” Supplementary Figure S2), and (C) top identified trees (BF ≥ 10 and posterior probability ≥ 0.01). A BF > 1 indicates that the data support the hypothesis that a given feature affects discontinuation (rather than having no effect). The magnitude of support for this hypothesis increases with the magnitude of the BF. We also calculated the log hazard of early discontinuation by using the partial likelihoods calculated in Step 3, as previously described (Supplementary Methods) [27]. Further information is outlined in the online supplement.
All analyses were conducted using R version 4.0 (Vienna, Austria). Code for the implementation of ALPS is available at: https://github.com/tpahern/ALPS-Bayesian-Pathway-Analysis.
Results
The final cohort of patients who initiated adjuvant tamoxifen and had available genetic information included 3,729 women (Table 1; flowchart for study inclusion in Supplementary Figure S3). The median age at diagnosis was 46 years (interquartile range: 42–49); most patients had stage II disease (55%) and were treated with chemotherapy before initiating tamoxifen (92%). We identified 536 women (14%) who prematurely discontinued tamoxifen, after accounting for 1,767 women (47%) who initiated aromatase inhibitors during follow-up, and were thus censored on the date of their switch.
Three of the four investigated variants in CYP2D6 were identified by ALPS to have some evidence of an association with early tamoxifen discontinuation (CYP2D6*10 [rs1065852] BF: 6.1; rs16947 BF: 5.9; CYP2D6*41 [rs28371725] BF: 3.9) (Fig. 2). In conventional analyses, we also observed some signals of an effect on discontinuation, for example, the CYP2D6*10 variant was associated with a decreased risk of early discontinuation (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.00). The fourth CYP2D6 variant investigated, CYP2D6*4 (rs3892097), was not identified by ALPS to be associated with discontinuation (BF: 0.67). Most genes in phase II metabolism were identified in neither ALPS nor conventional analyses to be associated with early discontinuation, except for SULT1A1*2 (rs9282861) (BF: 2.9; HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.01). Variants in the ABCC2 transporter gene were also identified in ALPS. The highest BF of 7.8 was observed for ABCC2 (rs3740065), which corresponded in conventional analyses to an increased hazard of early discontinuation, based on comparison of an increasing number of minor alleles versus wild-type homozygotes (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.35). ALPS diagnostics can be found in Supplementary Table S1 and results for the relationship between individual genetic variants modeled as factor variables and early discontinuation in Supplementary Tables S2 & S3.
Algorithm for Learning Pathway Structure (ALPS) Bayes Factors and multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (Cox regression models) for the relationship between individual genetic variants and time to tamoxifen discontinuation. Abbreviations: ALPS, Algorithm for Learning Pathway Structure; MAF, minor allele frequency; CI, confidence interval; CYP, cytochrome P450; SULT, sulfotransferase; UGT, uridine 5’-diphosphoglucuronosyltransferase; ABC, ATP-binding cassette. a. Multivariable models represent the hazard of discontinuation for each unit-increase in the number of minor alleles in the selected gene. b. Models adjusted for age at diagnosis, stage at diagnosis, surgery type, histologic grade, receipt of radiotherapy, receipt of chemotherapy, HER2 status, cohabitation status, and employment status at diagnosis
When combining the variants to investigate the effects of summary pathway concepts, we observed that variants in phase I metabolism influenced early discontinuation (BF = 7.5) (Table 2). The involvement of variants in CYP2D6 genes in early tamoxifen discontinuation was associated with discontinuation (BF = 22.6), whereas other phase I genes, such as CYP3A (BF = 0.1), were not associated with discontinuation. Variants in the synthesis of the metabolites produced in phase I metabolism, including 4-OH-TAM, NDM-TAM, and endoxifen, also showed some evidence of an association with early discontinuation (BF = 8.6, 8.6, and 5.6, respectively). Phase II metabolism did not appear to be associated with discontinuation (BF = 0.4), but the transporters involved in drug efflux did show some evidence of an association (BF = 3.3).
ALPS also identified specific combinations of genetic variants (i.e., trees) that are associated with time to discontinuation. Eight tree structures had a BF ≥ 10 and a posterior probability ≥ 0.01, six of which involved combinations of variants in CYP2D6 and ABC transporter genes (Supplementary Tables S4 & S5). The other two identified trees included combinations of variants in CYP2D6 and SULT1A1. As an example, we show the calculations for the top identified tree, which involved variants in CYP2D6 (rs16947) and ABCC2 (rs3740065) and had a BF of 138 (Fig. 3). The ALPS-derived hazard ratios are displayed in Table 3. Women with two variants in each gene had a risk of premature tamoxifen discontinuation four-fold that of women with no variants in both genes. In the full ProBe CaRe cohort, 775 women (21%) had at least one variant in each of these two genes.
Top tree-structure identified in the Algorithm for Learning Pathway Structure (ALPS) among 3,729 premenopausal breast cancer patients representing the association between the interaction between CYP2D6 and ABCC2 and early discontinuation of tamoxifen. Abbreviations: ALPS, Algorithm for Learning Pathway Structure; CYP, cytochrome P450; ABC, ATP-binding cassette. a. The green boxes show the individual theta (θ) values. These represent the quantification of the interaction between the two genes. b. The beta (β) represents the overall pathway effect of both genes on early discontinuation of tamoxifen
Discussion
Our findings suggest that phase I metabolism—which involves the formulation of 4-OH-TAM, NDM-TAM, and endoxifen—is associated with early discontinuation of tamoxifen. These findings were driven almost entirely by variants in CYP2D6. We observed no association between phase II genetic variants and treatment discontinuation but found some evidence of a role of transporters. We additionally observed potential gene interactions between variants in CYP2D6 and several ABC transporter genes that were associated with early tamoxifen discontinuation.
The combination of all investigated CYP2D6 genes had the strongest association with early discontinuation, substantiating the hypothesis that CYP2D6 function is associated with tamoxifen adherence. Investigations regarding variants in CYP2D6 and clinical response to tamoxifen have a long and somewhat controversial history in breast cancer research. Some studies have shown that variants in CYP2D6 increase the risk of breast cancer recurrence [29,30,31,32] and overall mortality [22, 29, 30, 33, 34], whereas others have found no association [35,36,37,38,39]. Additionally, several studies have investigated concomitant use of CYP2D6-inhibiting medications and tamoxifen response, and also have yielded inconsistent findings [37, 40,41,42,43]. In 2018, the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium published guidelines recommending CYP2D6 genotype-guided tamoxifen prescribing [44], but the ESMO clinical practice guidelines in 2019 stated that CYP2D6 polymorphisms should not be used as a decision aid [45]. Associations between CYP2D6 and recurrence and mortality might be mediated, at least partly, by rates of tamoxifen discontinuation.
The observed interaction between CYP2D6 and ABC variants on early discontinuation might suggest synergism between polymorphisms in CYP2D6 (rs16947) and ABCC2 (rs3740065). This interaction was previously associated with breast cancer recurrence. Kiyotani et al. observed an increasing hazard of recurrence as the number of risk alleles in both CYP2D6 and ABCC2 (rs3740065) increased [32]. Although this study was compromised by immortal time bias and low statistical power for analyses of gene–gene interactions, it is interesting that relatively common polymorphisms in these two genes have been identified to predict both discontinuation and recurrence in separate populations. Limited literature has described the roles of transporters in tamoxifen metabolism, thus highlighting an important area for future research. The link between CYP2D6 function and active metabolite levels is well established [46], but the level of active metabolites being transported across cells might be hypothesized to be further associated with early treatment discontinuation.
No data on tamoxifen-associated adverse effects were available in this study, but prior research suggests that genetic variants influencing tamoxifen metabolism may contribute to side effects, which in turn impact adherence and recurrence risk. Higher concentrations of active tamoxifen metabolites improve clinical outcomes but are also linked to greater side effect burden, which may lead to early discontinuation [47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. For example, high 4-OH-TAM was associated with vaginal dryness, which was also a predictor of early treatment discontinuation (HR: 3.72, 95% CI: 1.49, 9.72) [54]. CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers have shown increased use of medications for nausea, anxiety, and hot flashes, along with higher early discontinuation rates (HR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.11, 3.82) [22]. Although we did not have data on adverse effects, the observed associations in the current study may reflect differences in metabolite levels that influence both tolerability and early discontinuation. However, this remains a hypothesis, as we could not directly assess whether adverse effects mediated the relationship between genetic variation and discontinuation in our study.
This study had several limitations. First, not all genes involved in the metabolism of tamoxifen were included. As variants with a MAF ≤ 5% were not genotyped, our findings may be missing other contributors to early discontinuation. This study also only considered genetic pathways of tamoxifen metabolism, and no other pathways that could relate to adverse effects and early discontinuation. A key limitation is that genetic data were derived from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue rather than blood, preventing us from fully assessing CYP2D6 metabolizer status, which is typically based on many polymorphisms. Since we did not genotype all these variants, our results refer only to individual polymorphisms and their interactions, without providing information on overall enzyme activity. We also conducted this study among patients with available tumor tissue, which resulted in the exclusion of ~ 15% of patients who would have been eligible for the study had genetic data been available. The collection of tumor samples is routinely archived in the Danish Pathology Data Bank [55], but was not possible for the entire ProBe CaRe cohort. Additionally, the generalizability of our findings is limited. The ProBe CaRe cohort comprises primarily white women of European descent. Some variants identified in this study have markedly different MAFs in different populations. Finally, misclassification might have existed in our definition of tamoxifen discontinuation, which assumed that the women took the medication as dispensed. However, our definition was conservative, allowing for dosage carry-over and requiring a full 6-month gap in coverage before considering a woman to have discontinued therapy. This aspect would be expected to have biased our results toward the null.
In this comprehensive pharmacogenetic study among 3,729 premenopausal women with breast cancer, genetic variants involved in phase I metabolism, particularly among CYP2D6 genes, were associated with early tamoxifen discontinuation. Variants in CYP2D6 may synergistically interact with transporter genes in their relationship with discontinuation. These findings contribute to ongoing discussion on how to improve overall adherence to tamoxifen therapy, and potentially, improve long-term patient outcomes.
Data availability
The compilation and analysis of data in this study were conducted within the secure servers of Statistics Denmark and are not publicly available in accordance with Danish privacy laws. Procedures for accessing the data and a detailed study protocol can be made available by contacting the corresponding author.
References
Azim HA, Partridge AH (2014) Biology of breast cancer in young women. Breast Cancer Res: BCR 16:427. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-014-0427-5
Gradishar, W. J., Moran, M. S., Abraham, J., Aft, R., Agnese, D., Allison, K. H., Anderson, B., Burstein, H. J., Chew, H., Dang, C., Elias, A. D., Giordano, S. H., Goetz, M. P., Goldstein, L. J., Hurvitz, S. A., Isakoff, S. J., Jankowitz, R. C., Javid, S. H., Krishnamurthy, J., Kumar, R. (2022) Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 20(6): 691–722. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030
Cronin-Fenton DP, Damkier P (2018) Tamoxifen and CYP2D6: a controversy in pharmacogenetics. Adv Pharmacol (San Diego, Calif). 83:65–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apha.2018.03.001
Adam HK, Douglas EJ, Kemp JV (1979) The metabolism of tamoxifen in human. Biochem Pharmacol 28(1):145–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(79)90283-1
Sanchez-Spitman AB, Swen JJ, Dezentje VO, Moes DJAR, Gelderblom H, Guchelaar HJ (2019) Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of tamoxifen and endoxifen. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 12(6):523–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2019.1610390
International Transporter Consortium, Giacomini KM, Huang S-M, Tweedie DJ, Benet LZ, Brouwer KLR, Chu X, Dahlin A, Evers R, Fischer V, Hillgren KM, Hoffmaster KA, Ishikawa T, Keppler D, Kim RB, Lee CA, Niemi M, Polli JW, Sugiyama Y, Zhang L (2010) Membrane transporters in drug development. Nat Rev Drug Disc 9(3):215–236. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3028
Lai Y, Varma M, Feng B, Stephens JC, Kimoto E, El-Kattan A, Ichikawa K, Kikkawa H, Ono C, Suzuki A, Suzuki M, Yamamoto Y, Tremaine L (2012) Impact of drug transporter pharmacogenomics on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability—Considerations for drug development. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 8(6):723–743. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2012.678048
Vasiliou V, Vasiliou K, Nebert DW (2009) Human ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family. Hum Genom 3(3):281–290. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-7364-3-3-281
Lazarus P, Blevins-Primeau AS, Zheng Y, Sun D (2009) Potential role of UGT pharmacogenetics in cancer treatment and prevention: Focus on tamoxifen. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1155:99–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04114.x
Ahern TP, Christensen M, Cronin-Fenton DP, Lunetta KL, Søiland H, Gjerde J, Garne JP, Rosenberg CL, Silliman RA, Sørensen HT, Lash TL, Hamilton-Dutoit S (2011) Functional polymorphisms in UDP-glucuronosyl transferases and recurrence in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prevent 20(9):1937–1943. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0419
Gjerde J, Hauglid M, Breilid H, Lundgren S, Varhaug JE, Kisanga ER, Mellgren G, Steen VM, Lien EA (2008) Effects of CYP2D6 and SULT1A1 genotypes including SULT1A1 gene copy number on tamoxifen metabolism. Ann Oncol 19(1):56–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdm434
Jin Y, Desta Z, Stearns V, Ward B, Ho H, Lee K-H, Skaar T, Storniolo AM, Li L, Araba A, Blanchard R, Nguyen A, Ullmer L, Hayden J, Lemler S, Weinshilboum RM, Rae JM, Hayes DF, Flockhart DA (2005) CYP2D6 genotype, antidepressant use, and tamoxifen metabolism during adjuvant breast cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(1):30–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji005
Ahern TP, Collin LJ, Baurley JW, Kjærsgaard A, Nash R, Maliniak ML, Damkier P, Zwick ME, Isett RB, Christiansen PM, Ejlertsen B, Lauridsen KL, Christensen KB, Silliman RA, Sørensen HT, Tramm T, Hamilton-Dutoit S, Lash TL, Cronin-Fenton D (2020) Metabolic pathway analysis and effectiveness of tamoxifen in danish breast cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prevent 29(3):582–590. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0833
Collin LJ, Cronin-Fenton DP, Ahern TP, Goodman M, McCullough LE, Waller LA, Kjærsgaard A, Damkier P, Christiansen PM, Ejlertsen B, Jensen M-B, Sørensen HT, Lash TL (2021) Early Discontinuation of endocrine therapy and recurrence of breast cancer among premenopausal women. Clin Cancer Res: An Off J American Associat Cancer Res 27(5):1421–1428. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3974
Woolpert KM, Schmidt JA, Ahern TP, Hjorth CF, Farkas DK, Ejlertsen B, Collin LJ, Lash TL, Cronin-Fenton DP (2024) Clinical factors associated with patterns of endocrine therapy adherence in premenopausal breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res 26(1):59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-024-01819-4
Schmidt JA, Woolpert KM, Hjorth CF, Farkas DK, Ejlertsen B, Cronin-Fenton D (2024) Social characteristics and adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:02643. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.02643
Demissie S, Silliman RA, Lash TL (2001) Adjuvant tamoxifen: predictors of use, side effects, and discontinuation in older women. J Clin Oncol 19(2):322–328. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.2.322
Thorén L, Lindh JD, Ackehed G, Kringen MK, Hall P, Bergh J, Molden E, Margolin S, Eliasson E (2021) Impairment of endoxifen formation in tamoxifen-treated premenopausal breast cancer patients carrying reduced-function CYP2D6 alleles. Br J Clin Pharmacol 87(3):1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14500
Buijs SM, Hoop EO, Braal CL, van Rosmalen MM, Drooger JC, van Rossum-Schornagel QC, Vastbinder MB, Koolen SLW, Jager A, Mathijssen RHJ (2023) The impact of endoxifen-guided tamoxifen dose reductions on endocrine side-effects in patients with primary breast cancer. ESMO Open 8(1):100786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.100786
He W, Eriksson M, Eliasson E, Grassmann F, Bäcklund M, Gabrielson M, Hammarström M, Margolin S, Thorén L, Wengström Y, Borgquist S, Hall P, Czene K (2021) CYP2D6 genotype predicts tamoxifen discontinuation and drug response: a secondary analysis of the KARISMA trial. Ann Oncol: Off J European Soc Med Oncol 32(10):1286–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.07.005
Madlensky L, Natarajan L, Tchu S, Pu M, Mortimer J, Flatt SW, Nikoloff DM, Hillman G, Fontecha MR, Lawrence HJ, Parker BA, Wu AHB, Pierce JP (2011) Tamoxifen metabolite concentrations, CYP2D6 genotype, and breast cancer outcomes. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89(5):718–725. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2011.32
He W, Grassmann F, Eriksson M, Eliasson E, Margolin S, Thorén L, Hall P, Czene K (2020) CYP2D6 genotype predicts tamoxifen discontinuation and prognosis in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 38(6):548–557. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01535
Collin LJ, Cronin-Fenton DP, Ahern TP, Christiansen PM, Damkier P, Ejlertsen B, Hamilton-Dutoit S, Kjærsgaard A, Silliman RA, Sørensen HT, Lash TL (2018) Cohort profile: the predictors of breast cancer recurrence (ProBe CaRE) premenopausal breast cancer cohort study in Denmark. BMJ Open 8(7):e021805. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021805
Weir BS (1996) Genetic Data Analysis. Methods for Discrete Population Genetic Data. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
Møller S, Jensen M-B, Ejlertsen B, Bjerre KD, Larsen M, Hansen HB, Christiansen P, Mouridsen HT, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (2008) The clinical database and the treatment guidelines of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG); its 30-years experience and future promise. Acta Oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) 47(4):506–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802059259
Steenland K, Bray I, Greenland S, Boffetta P (2000) Empirical bayes adjustments for multiple results in hypothesis-generating or surveillance studies1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 9(9):895–903
Baurley JW, Kjærsgaard A, Zwick ME, Cronin-Fenton DP, Collin LJ, Damkier P, Hamilton-Dutoit S, Lash TL, Ahern TP (2020) Bayesian pathway analysis for complex interactions. Am J Epidemiol 189(12):1610–1622. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa130
Baurley J, Conti DV, Gauderman J, Thomas D (2010) Discovery of complex pathways from observational data. Stat Med 29(19):1998–2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3962
Schroth W, Goetz MP, Hamann U, Fasching PA, Schmidt M, Winter S, Fritz P, Simon W, Suman VJ, Ames MM, Safgren SL, Kuffel MJ, Ulmer HU, Boländer J, Strick R, Beckmann MW, Koelbl H, Weinshilboum RM, Ingle JN, Brauch H (2009) Association between CYP2D6 polymorphisms and outcomes among women with early stage breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. JAMA 302(13):1429–1436. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1420
Goetz MP, Suman VJ, Hoskin TL, Gnant M, Filipits M, Safgren SL, Kuffel M, Jakesz R, Rudas M, Greil R, Dietze O, Lang A, Offner F, Reynolds CA, Weinshilboum RM, Ames MM, Ingle JN (2013) CYP2D6 metabolism and patient outcome in the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group trial (ABCSG) 8. Clin Cancer Res: An Off J American Assoc Cancer Res 19(2):500–507. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2153
Damodaran SE, Pradhan SC, Umamaheswaran G, Kadambari D, Reddy KS, Adithan C (2012) Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 increase the risk for recurrence of breast cancer in patients receiving tamoxifen as an adjuvant therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 70(1):75–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-012-1891-1
Kiyotani K, Mushiroda T, Imamura CK, Hosono N, Tsunoda T, Kubo M, Tanigawara Y, Flockhart DA, Desta Z, Skaar TC, Aki F, Hirata K, Takatsuka Y, Okazaki M, Ohsumi S, Yamakawa T, Sasa M, Nakamura Y, Zembutsu H (2010) Significant effect of polymorphisms in CYP2D6 and ABCC2 on clinical outcomes of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 28(8):1287–1293. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.7246
Bijl MJ, van Schaik RHN, Lammers LA, Hofman A, Vulto AG, van Gelder T, Stricker BHC, Visser LE (2009) The CYP2D6*4 polymorphism affects breast cancer survival in tamoxifen users. Breast Cancer Res Treat 118(1):125–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0272-2
Xu Y, Sun Y, Yao L, Shi L, Wu Y, Ouyang T, Li J, Wang T, Fan Z, Fan T, Lin B, He L, Li P, Xie Y (2008) Association between CYP2D6 *10 genotype and survival of breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen treatment. Ann Oncol: Off J European Soc Med Oncol 19(8):1423–1429. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdn155
Regan MM, Leyland-Jones B, Bouzyk M, Pagani O, Tang W, Kammler R, Dell’Orto P, Biasi MO, Thürlimann B, Lyng MB, Ditzel HJ, Neven P, Debled M, Maibach R, Price KN, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Goldhirsch A, Rae JM, Viale G (2012) CYP2D6 genotype and tamoxifen response in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: the breast international group 1–98 Trial. JNCI J Nat Cancer Instit 104(6):441. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs125
Rae JM, Drury S, Hayes DF, Stearns V, Thibert JN, Haynes BP, Salter J, Sestak I, Cuzick J, Dowsett M, ATAC trialists (2012) CYP2D6 and UGT2B7 genotype and risk of recurrence in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(6):452–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs126
Lash TL, Cronin-Fenton D, Ahern TP, Rosenberg CL, Lunetta KL, Silliman RA, Garne JP, Sørensen HT, Hellberg Y, Christensen M, Pedersen L, Hamilton-Dutoit S (2011) CYP2D6 inhibition and breast cancer recurrence in a population-based study in Denmark. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(6):489–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr010
Gor PP, Su HI, Gray RJ, Gimotty PA, Horn M, Aplenc R, Vaughan WP, Tallman MS, Rebbeck TR, DeMichele A (2010) Cyclophosphamide-metabolizing enzyme polymorphisms and survival outcomes after adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res: BCR 12(3):R26. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2570
DeCensi A, Johansson H, Helland T, Puntoni M, Macis D, Aristarco V, Caviglia S, Webber TB, Briata IM, D’Amico M, Serrano D, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Bifulco E, Hustad S, Søiland H, Boni L, Bonanni B, Mellgren G (2021) Association of CYP2D6 genotype and tamoxifen metabolites with breast cancer recurrence in a low-dose trial. Npj Breast Cancer 7(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00236-6
Valachis A, Garmo H, Weinman J, Fredriksson I, Ahlgren J, Sund M, Holmberg L (2016) Effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors use on endocrine therapy adherence and breast cancer mortality: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 159(2):293–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3928-3
Haque R, Shi J, Schottinger JE, Ahmed SA, Cheetham TC, Chung J, Avila C, Kleinman K, Habel LA, Fletcher SW, Kwan ML (2016) Tamoxifen and antidepressant drug interaction in a cohort of 16,887 breast cancer survivors. J Nat Cancer Instit. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv337
Chubak J, Bowles EJA, Yu O, Buist DSM, Fujii M, Boudreau DM (2016) Breast cancer recurrence in relation to antidepressant use. Cancer Causes Control: CCC 27(1):125–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0689-y
Ahern TP, Pedersen L, Cronin-Fenton DP, Sørensen HT, Lash TL (2009) No increase in breast cancer recurrence with concurrent use of tamoxifen and some CYP2D6-inhibiting medications. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18(9):2562–2564. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0516
Goetz MP, Sangkuhl K, Guchelaar H-J, Schwab M, Province M, Whirl-Carrillo M, Symmans WF, McLeod HL, Ratain MJ, Zembutsu H, Gaedigk A, van Schaik RH, Ingle JN, Caudle KE, Klein TE (2018) Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC) guideline for CYP2D6 and tamoxifen therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 103(5):770–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1007
Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rubio IT, Zackrisson S, Senkus E (2019) Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol 30(8):1194–1220. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz173
Sideras K, Ingle JN, Ames MM, Loprinzi CL, Mrazek DP, Black JL, Weinshilboum RM, Hawse JR, Spelsberg TC, Goetz MP (2010) Coprescription of tamoxifen and medications that inhibit CYP2D6. J Clin Oncol: Off J American Soc Clin Oncol 28(16):2768–2776. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8931
Mortimer JE, Flatt SW, Parker BA, Gold EB, Wasserman L, Natarajan L, Pierce JP (2008) Tamoxifen, hot flashes and recurrence in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 108(3):421–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9612-xx
Fontein DBY, Seynaeve C, Hadji P, Hille ETM, van de Water W, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM-K, Hasenburg A, Paridaens RJ, Vannetzel J-M, Markopoulos C, Hozumi Y, Bartlett JMS, Jones SE, Rea DW, Nortier JWR, van de Velde CJH (2013) Specific adverse events predict survival benefit in patients treated with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors: an international tamoxifen exemestane adjuvant multinational trial analysis. J Clin Oncol: Off J American Soc Clin Oncol 31(18):2257–2264. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.45.3068
Huober J, Cole BF, Rabaglio M, Giobbie-Hurder A, Wu J, Ejlertsen B, Bonnefoi H, Forbes JF, Neven P, Láng I, Smith I, Wardley A, Price KN, Goldhirsch A, Coates AS, Colleoni M, Gelber RD, Thürlimann B (2014) Symptoms of endocrine treatment and outcome in the BIG 1–98 study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 143(1):159–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2792-7
Stearns V, Johnson MD, Rae JM, Morocho A, Novielli A, Bhargava P, Hayes DF, Desta Z, Flockhart DA (2003) Active tamoxifen metabolite plasma concentrations after coadministration of tamoxifen and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(23):1758–1764. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djg108
Yoo T-K, Jang M, Lee E, Moon H-G, Noh D-Y, Han W (2018) Endocrine treatment-related symptoms and patient outcomes in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Breast Cancer 21(1):37–44. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2018.21.1.37
Lorizio W, Wu AHB, Beattie MS, Rugo H, Tchu S, Kerlikowske K, Ziv E (2012) Clinical and biomarker predictors of side effects from tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132(3):1107–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1893-4
Gallicchio L, Lord G, Tkaczuk K, Danton M, Lewis LM, Lim CK, Flaws JA (2004) Association of tamoxifen (TAM) and TAM metabolite concentrations with self-reported side effects of TAM in women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 85(1):89–97. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BREA.0000021050.92539.b0
Helland T, Hagen KB, Haugstøyl ME, Kvaløy JT, Lunde S, Lode K, Lind RA, Gripsrud BH, Jonsdottir K, Gjerde J, Bifulco E, Hustad S, Jonassen J, Aas T, Lende TH, Lien EA, Janssen EAM, Søiland H, Mellgren G (2019) Drug monitoring of tamoxifen metabolites predicts vaginal dryness and verifies a low discontinuation rate from the Norwegian prescription database. Breast Cancer Res Treat 177(1):185–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05294-w
Bjerregaard B, Larsen OB (2011) The danish pathology register. Scandinavian J Pub Health 39(7 Suppl):72–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810393563
Funding
Open access funding provided by Aarhus Universitet. This project was supported by research grants to DCF from the Independent Research Fund Denmark, Medicine (DFF-1030-00052B), the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF19OC0058710 and NNF20OC0065928), and the Danish Cancer Society (R327-A19070). The project was also supported by a grant from the Danish Cancer Society (R360-A21289) to KMW. LJC was supported by K99CA277580 from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Collection of the original cohort data was supported by the National Cancer Institute at the US National Institutes of Health (R01CA166825).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KMW: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing-Original Draft, Writing-Review & Editing, Visualization; TPA: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Formal Analysis, Writing- Review & Editing; JWB: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal Analysis, Writing-Review & Editing; MLM: Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing-Review & Editing; PD: Writing-Review & Editing; AK: Formal Analysis, Writing-Review & Editing; LJC: Methodology, Writing-Review & Editing; SH-D: Writing-Review & Editing; TT: Writing-Review & Editing; BE: Writing-Review & Editing; HTS: Writing-Review & Editing; TLL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing-Review & Editing; DPC-F: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing-Review & Editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
LJC reports personal fees from Epidemiologic Research & Methods, LLC outside of the submitted work. TLL is a member of the Amgen Methods Advisory Council, for which he receives consulting fees and travel support. This work is outside of the submitted work. BE reports outside the submitted work an Advisory Role: Eli Lilly; Research funding: Institutional grants from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, and Seagen; and Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, and Pfizer. The Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, receives funding for other studies from the European Medicines Agency and from companies in the form of research grants, unrelated to the current study. All other authors have no disclosures.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Woolpert, K.M., Ahern, T.P., Baurley, J.W. et al. Genetic variants in tamoxifen metabolism and early treatment discontinuation among premenopausal breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 212, 251–260 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07719-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07719-1





