{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,25]],"date-time":"2025-03-25T18:20:33Z","timestamp":1742926833278,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783031157066"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783031157073"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-15707-3_6","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,26]],"date-time":"2022-08-26T11:02:47Z","timestamp":1661511767000},"page":"62-74","update-policy":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["A Definition of\u00a0Sceptical Semantics in\u00a0the\u00a0Constellations Approach"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Stefano","family":"Bistarelli","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Francesco","family":"Santini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"6_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J., Doder, D., Vesic, S.: Acceptability semantics for weighted argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 56\u201362. ijcai.org (2017)","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/9"},{"issue":"4","key":"6_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888911000166","volume":"26","author":"P Baroni","year":"2011","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Caminada, M., Giacomin, M.: An introduction to argumentation semantics. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 26(4), 365\u2013410 (2011)","journal-title":"Knowl. Eng. Rev."},{"key":"6_CR3","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Vicig, P.: On rationality conditions for epistemic probabilities in abstract argumentation. In: Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA, FAIA, vol. 266, pp. 121\u2013132. IOS Press (2014)"},{"issue":"6","key":"6_CR4","first-page":"1503","volume":"8","author":"D Baumeister","year":"2021","unstructured":"Baumeister, D., Neugebauer, D., Rothe, J.: Collective acceptability in abstract argumentation. FLAP 8(6), 1503\u20131542 (2021)","journal-title":"FLAP"},{"key":"6_CR5","unstructured":"Bistarelli, S., Rossi, F., Santini, F.: ConArg: a tool for classical and weighted argumentation. In: Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA, FAIA, vol. 287, pp. 463\u2013464. IOS Press (2016)"},{"key":"6_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bistarelli, S., Rossi, F., Santini, F.: A ConArg-based library for abstract argumentation. In: 29th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI, pp. 374\u2013381. IEEE Computer Society (2017)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICTAI.2017.00065"},{"issue":"6","key":"6_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1080\/0952813X.2020.1789756","volume":"33","author":"S Bistarelli","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bistarelli, S., Rossi, F., Santini, F.: ConArgLib: an argumentation library with support to search strategies and parallel search. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 33(6), 891\u2013918 (2021)","journal-title":"J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"6","key":"6_CR8","first-page":"1589","volume":"8","author":"S Bistarelli","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bistarelli, S., Santini, F.: Weighted argumentation. FLAP 8(6), 1589\u20131622 (2021)","journal-title":"FLAP"},{"key":"6_CR9","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1007\/11853886_11","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"M Caminada","year":"2006","unstructured":"Caminada, M.: On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds.) JELIA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4160, pp. 111\u2013123. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/doi.org\/10.1007\/11853886_11"},{"key":"6_CR10","unstructured":"Caminada, M.: Comparing two unique extension semantics for formal argumentation: ideal and eager. In: Belgian-Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC), pp. 81\u201387 (2007)"},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"6_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.012","volume":"171","author":"S Coste-Marquis","year":"2007","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Konieczny, S., Lagasquie-Schiex, M., Marquis, P.: On the merging of Dung\u2019s argumentation systems. Artif. Intell. 171(10\u201315), 730\u2013753 (2007)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"6_CR12","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-11508-5_12","volume-title":"Scalable Uncertainty Management","author":"D Doder","year":"2014","unstructured":"Doder, D., Woltran, S.: Probabilistic argumentation frameworks \u2013 a logical approach. In: Straccia, U., Cal\u00ec, A. (eds.) SUM 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8720, pp. 134\u2013147. Springer, Cham (2014). https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-11508-5_12"},{"issue":"2","key":"6_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"6_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.003","volume":"171","author":"PM Dung","year":"2007","unstructured":"Dung, P.M., Mancarella, P., Toni, F.: Computing ideal sceptical argumentation. Artif. Intell. 171(10\u201315), 642\u2013674 (2007)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"6_CR15","unstructured":"Dung, P.M., Thang, P.M.: Towards (probabilistic) argumentation for jury-based dispute resolution. In: Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA, FAIA, vol. 216, pp. 171\u2013182. IOS Press (2010)"},{"key":"6_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S., Parisi, F.: On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 16(3), 22:1\u201322:39 (2015)","DOI":"10.1145\/2749463"},{"issue":"1","key":"6_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2012.08.003","volume":"54","author":"A Hunter","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hunter, A.: A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 54(1), 47\u201381 (2013)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approx. Reason."},{"key":"6_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.5393","volume":"59","author":"A Hunter","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hunter, A., Thimm, M.: Probabilistic reasoning with abstract argumentation frameworks. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 59, 565\u2013611 (2017)","journal-title":"J. Artif. Intell. Res."},{"key":"6_CR19","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-29184-5_1","volume-title":"Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation","author":"H Li","year":"2012","unstructured":"Li, H., Oren, N., Norman, T.J.: Probabilistic argumentation frameworks. In: Modgil, S., Oren, N., Toni, F. (eds.) TAFA 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7132, pp. 1\u201316. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-29184-5_1"},{"key":"6_CR20","unstructured":"Riveret, R., Governatori, G.: On learning attacks in probabilistic abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, pp. 653\u2013661. ACM (2016)"},{"key":"6_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Santini, F., J\u00f8sang, A., Pini, M.S.: Are my arguments trustworthy? Abstract argumentation with subjective logic. In: 21st International Conference on Information Fusion, FUSION, pp. 1982\u20131989. IEEE (2018)","DOI":"10.23919\/ICIF.2018.8455455"},{"key":"6_CR22","unstructured":"Thimm, M.: A probabilistic semantics for abstract argumentation. In: ECAI - 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, FAIA, vol. 242, pp. 750\u2013755. IOS Press (2012)"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-031-15707-3_6","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,25]],"date-time":"2022-11-25T21:32:14Z","timestamp":1669411934000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-031-15707-3_6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"ISBN":["9783031157066","9783031157073"],"references-count":22,"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-15707-3_6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 August 2022","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"LPNMR","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Genoa","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Italy","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2022","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"5 September 2022","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"9 September 2022","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"16","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"lpnmr2022","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/lpnmr2022.dibris.unige.it\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"easychair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"57","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"34","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"5","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"60% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}