{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,21]],"date-time":"2026-07-21T19:12:34Z","timestamp":1784661154680,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,1]],"date-time":"2022-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1661990400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,1]],"date-time":"2022-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1661990400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,20]],"date-time":"2022-07-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1658275200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/http\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004543","name":"China Scholarship Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["201708440305"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["201708440305"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004543","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Information Sciences"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,22]],"date-time":"2022-07-22T11:17:00Z","timestamp":1658488620000},"page":"957-976","update-policy":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":39,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Best-worst Tradeoff method"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"610","author":[{"given":"Fuqi","family":"Liang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matteo","family":"Brunelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jafar","family":"Rezaei","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.3233\/FI-2016-1338","article-title":"Recent advances on inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons\u2014A commentary","volume":"144","author":"Brunelli","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fundamenta Informaticae"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0010","series-title":"Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys","author":"Greco","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0015","series-title":"Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision making model outcomes in water resources management","author":"Zardari","year":"2015"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0020","series-title":"Elicitation","author":"Dias","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-2496(77)90033-5","article-title":"A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures","volume":"15","author":"Saaty","year":"1977","journal-title":"J. Math. Psychol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1006\/obhd.1994.1087","article-title":"SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement","volume":"60","author":"Edwards","year":"1994","journal-title":"Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.1016\/S0305-0483(01)00044-5","article-title":"A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: Good, better, and best","volume":"29","author":"Bottomley","year":"2001","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0040","series-title":"Decision analysis and behavioral research","author":"Von Winterfeldt","year":"1986"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2014.11.009","article-title":"Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method","volume":"53","author":"Rezaei","year":"2015","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2015.12.001","article-title":"Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model","volume":"64","author":"Rezaei","year":"2016","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0055","series-title":"Decision analysis with multiple conflicting objectives","author":"Keeney","year":"1976"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1006\/obhd.1995.1048","article-title":"Range sensitivity of attribute weights in multiattribute value models","volume":"62","author":"Fischer","year":"1995","journal-title":"Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.39.8.937","article-title":"The effect of attribute ranges on weights in multiattribute utility measurements","volume":"39","author":"von Nitzsch","year":"1993","journal-title":"Manage. Sci."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.33.2.198","article-title":"Preferences for proxy attributes","volume":"33","author":"Fischer","year":"1987","journal-title":"Manage. Sci."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1140","DOI":"10.1080\/01605682.2018.1489346","article-title":"Judgments of importance revisited: What do they mean?","volume":"70","author":"Pajala","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Oper. Res. Soc."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"935","DOI":"10.1287\/opre.50.6.935.357","article-title":"Common mistakes in making value trade-offs","volume":"50","author":"Keeney","year":"2002","journal-title":"Oper. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2015.08.058","article-title":"A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: Flexible and interactive tradeoff","volume":"250","author":"de Almeida","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur. J. Oper. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0090","series-title":"The new organon and related writings","author":"Bacon","year":"1960"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/0377-2217(93)90318-H","article-title":"Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making","volume":"67","author":"Weber","year":"1993","journal-title":"Eur. J. Oper. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0100","series-title":"Rational decision making","author":"Eisenf\u00fchr","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"810","DOI":"10.1287\/opre.27.4.810","article-title":"Measurable multiattribute value functions","volume":"27","author":"Dyer","year":"1979","journal-title":"Oper. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.13.7.435","article-title":"Methods of estimating additive utilities","volume":"13","author":"Fishburn","year":"1967","journal-title":"Manage. Sci."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2013.09.016","article-title":"Implausible alternatives in eliciting multi-attribute value functions","volume":"234","author":"Vetschera","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur. J. Oper. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102175","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2019.102175","article-title":"Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds","volume":"96","author":"Liang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dss.2015.04.005","article-title":"Some extensions of the precise consistency consensus matrix","volume":"74","author":"Escobar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Decis. Support Syst."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1002\/mcda.1559","article-title":"Weak consistency for ensuring priority vectors reliability","volume":"23","author":"Cavallo","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/30.1-2.81","article-title":"A new measure of rank correlation","volume":"30","author":"Kendall","year":"1938","journal-title":"Biometrika"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2019.08.042","article-title":"On the transitivity and consistency approximated thresholds of some consistency indices for pairwise comparison matrices","volume":"507","author":"Amenta","year":"2020","journal-title":"Inf. Sci."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0145","series-title":"Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments","author":"Myers","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1108\/MD-04-2018-0482","article-title":"Port performance measurement in the context of port choice: an MCDA approach","volume":"57","author":"Rezaei","year":"2019","journal-title":"Manag. Decis."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1124","DOI":"10.1126\/science.185.4157.1124","article-title":"Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases","volume":"185","author":"Tversky","year":"1974","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1016\/S0305-0548(97)00014-2","article-title":"The effects of anchoring in interactive MCDM solution methods","volume":"24","author":"Buchanan","year":"1997","journal-title":"Comput. Oper. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1230","DOI":"10.1111\/risa.12360","article-title":"Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis","volume":"35","author":"Montibeller","year":"2015","journal-title":"Risk Anal."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1080\/12460125.2020.1840705","article-title":"Anchoring bias in eliciting attribute weights and values in multi-attribute decision-making","volume":"30","author":"Rezaei","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Decision Syst."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Rezaei, The balancing role of best and worst in Best-Worst Method. in The International Workshop on Best-Worst Method, Springer, Cham. 2021: 1-15.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-89795-6_1"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1603","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.37.12.1603","article-title":"Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement","volume":"37","author":"Borcherding","year":"1991","journal-title":"Manage. Sci."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1007\/s10100-020-00728-z","article-title":"Combining holistic and decomposition paradigms in preference modeling with the flexibility of FITradeoff","volume":"29","author":"de Almeida","year":"2021","journal-title":"CEJOR"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1007\/s10479-014-1767-3","article-title":"How relevant is the lack of reciprocity in pairwise comparisons? An experiment with AHP","volume":"245","author":"Linares","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann. Oper. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1053","DOI":"10.1287\/opre.40.6.1053","article-title":"Preference assessment by imprecise ratio statements","volume":"40","author":"Salo","year":"1992","journal-title":"Oper. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1287\/opre.33.1.38","article-title":"Ranking with partial information: A method and an application","volume":"33","author":"Kirkwood","year":"1985","journal-title":"Oper. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1011","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.36.9.1011","article-title":"Eliciting public values for complex policy decisions","volume":"36","author":"Keeney","year":"1990","journal-title":"Manage. Sci."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/0169-2070(95)00643-5","article-title":"Remarks on the application of the analytic hierarchy process to judgmental forecasting","volume":"12","author":"Belton","year":"1996","journal-title":"Int. J. Forecast."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1006\/jmps.2001.1390","article-title":"Loss aversion and scale compatibility in two-attribute trade-offs","volume":"46","author":"Bleichrodt","year":"2002","journal-title":"J. Math. Psychol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2019.09.004","article-title":"On preference elicitation processes which mitigate the accumulation of biases in multi-criteria decision analysis","volume":"282","author":"Lahtinen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur. J. Oper. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"890","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2015.09.056","article-title":"Path dependence and biases in the even swaps decision analysis method","volume":"249","author":"Lahtinen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur. J. Oper. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097_b0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1142\/S0219622020500170","article-title":"A concentration ratio for nonlinear best worst method","volume":"19","author":"Rezaei","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decision Making"}],"container-title":["Information Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020025522007861?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020025522007861?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,17]],"date-time":"2025-09-17T05:51:53Z","timestamp":1758088313000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0020025522007861"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,9]]},"references-count":46,"alternative-id":["S0020025522007861"],"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097","relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-0255"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-0255","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Best-worst Tradeoff method","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Information Sciences","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ins.2022.07.097","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}