{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,26]],"date-time":"2026-06-26T11:47:51Z","timestamp":1782474471484,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,1]],"date-time":"2026-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772323200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Information"],"abstract":"<jats:p>The integration of artificial intelligence into criminal sentencing decisions represents one of the most consequential applications of algorithmic systems in contemporary governance. While AI-assisted risk assessment tools promise enhanced consistency and predictive accuracy, their deployment in judicial contexts raises profound concerns regarding transparency, due process, and fundamental rights. This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for AI-assisted sentencing modeling that embeds explainability as a foundational constraint rather than an afterthought. Drawing upon the landmark State v. Loomis decision, empirical analyses of the COMPAS algorithm, and emerging regulatory frameworks including the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act, we examine the tension between predictive performance and interpretive transparency. Our framework integrates a three-layer explanation architecture: inherent interpretability through generalized additive models (GA2Ms) providing transparent global structure, exact local feature attribution derived directly from the additive model decomposition without approximation, and counterfactual reasoning that identifies minimal input changes altering risk classifications. We demonstrate through rigorous experimental validation on the ProPublica COMPAS dataset (n = 6172) that explainability-constrained models achieve comparable predictive validity to opaque alternatives (AUC 0.71 versus 0.70\u20130.72 for black-box methods) while satisfying constitutional due process requirements and emerging regulatory mandates under the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. The impossibility theorems governing algorithmic fairness are examined in light of their implications for sentencing equity, and we propose that transparent model architectures enable targeted interventions unavailable when decision logic remains concealed. The paper concludes with policy guidance for jurisdictions seeking to implement AI-assisted sentencing systems that balance public safety objectives with procedural fairness and individual rights.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/info17030234","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,2]],"date-time":"2026-03-02T12:39:56Z","timestamp":1772455196000},"page":"234","update-policy":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["AI-Assisted Sentencing Modeling Under Explainability Constraints: Framework Design and Judicial Applicability Analysis"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Jie","family":"Sun","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Criminal Justice, Shandong University of Political Science and Law, Jinan 250014, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4088-1418","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tao","family":"Shen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"College of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"Desmarais, S.L., and Singh, J.P. (2013). Risk Assessment Instruments Validated and Implemented in Correctional Settings in the United States, Council of State Governments Justice Center. Available online: https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/csgjusticecenter.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/Risk-Assessment-Instruments-Validated-and-Implemented-in-Correctional-Settings-in-the-United-States.pdf."},{"key":"ref_2","unstructured":"Kehl, D., Guo, P., and Kessler, S. (2017). Algorithms in the Criminal Justice System: Assessing the Use of Risk Assessments in Sentencing; Responsive Communities Initiative, Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard Law School. Available online: https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/http\/nrs.harvard.edu\/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33746041."},{"key":"ref_3","first-page":"803","article-title":"Evidence-Based Sentencing and the Scientific Rationalization of Discrimination","volume":"66","author":"Starr","year":"2014","journal-title":"Stanf. Law Rev."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Harcourt, B.E. (2007). Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age, University of Chicago Press.","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226315997.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1038\/s42256-019-0048-x","article-title":"Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead","volume":"1","author":"Rudin","year":"2019","journal-title":"Nat. Mach. Intell."},{"key":"ref_6","unstructured":"Stevenson, M.T., and Doleac, J.L. (2022). Algorithmic Risk Assessment in the Hands of Humans, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). IZA Discussion Paper No. 12853."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1177\/0011128705281748","article-title":"Statistical Risk Assessment: Old Problems and New Applications","volume":"52","author":"Gottfredson","year":"2006","journal-title":"Crime Delinq."},{"key":"ref_8","unstructured":"Bruce, A.A., Harno, A.J., Burgess, E.W., and Landesco, J. (1928). Factors Determining Success or Failure on Parole. The Workings of the Indeterminate Sentence Law and the Parole System in Illinois, State Board of Parole."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1177\/0011128705281756","article-title":"The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and\/or Need Assessment","volume":"52","author":"Andrews","year":"2006","journal-title":"Crime Delinq."},{"key":"ref_10","unstructured":"Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., and Kirchner, L. (2026, January 21). Machine Bias: There\u2019s Software Used across the Country to Predict Future Criminals. And It\u2019s Biased against Blacks. ProPublica. Available online: https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/www.propublica.org\/article\/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1111\/1745-9133.12481","article-title":"The Public Safety Assessment: A Re-Validation and Assessment of Predictive Utility and Differential Prediction by Race and Gender in Kentucky","volume":"19","author":"DeMichele","year":"2020","journal-title":"Criminol. Public Policy"},{"key":"ref_12","unstructured":"Andrews, D.A., and Bonta, J. (2010). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, Anderson Publishing. [5th ed.]."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cpr.2010.11.009","article-title":"A Comparative Study of Violence Risk Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis of 68 Studies Involving 25980 Participants","volume":"31","author":"Singh","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin. Psychol. Rev."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e4692","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e4692","article-title":"Use of Risk Assessment Instruments to Predict Violence and Antisocial Behaviour in 73 Samples Involving 24827 People: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","volume":"345","author":"Fazel","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"eaao5580","DOI":"10.1126\/sciadv.aao5580","article-title":"The Accuracy, Fairness, and Limits of Predicting Recidivism","volume":"4","author":"Dressel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Sci. Adv."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"eaaz0652","DOI":"10.1126\/sciadv.aaz0652","article-title":"The Limits of Human Predictions of Recidivism","volume":"6","author":"Lin","year":"2020","journal-title":"Sci. Adv."},{"key":"ref_17","unstructured":"Dieterich, W., Mendoza, C., and Brennan, T. (2016). COMPAS Risk Scales: Demonstrating Accuracy Equity and Predictive Parity, Northpointe Inc. Research Department. Technical Report."},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., and Raghavan, M. (2017, January 9\u201311). Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores. Proceedings of the Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2017), Berkeley, CA, USA."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1089\/big.2016.0047","article-title":"Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments","volume":"5","author":"Chouldechova","year":"2017","journal-title":"Big Data"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13\u201317). \u201cWhy Should I Trust You?\u201d: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.","DOI":"10.1145\/2939672.2939778"},{"key":"ref_21","unstructured":"Guyon, I., Luxburg, U.V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., and Garnett, R. (2017). A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017), Curran Associates, Inc."},{"key":"ref_22","first-page":"1","article-title":"The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions","volume":"89","author":"Citron","year":"2014","journal-title":"Wash. Law Rev."},{"key":"ref_23","unstructured":"Supreme Court of the United States (2026, February 02). Gardner v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349. Available online: https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/430\/349\/."},{"key":"ref_24","unstructured":"Supreme Court of Wisconsin (2026, February 02). State v. Loomis, 881 N.W.2d 749. Available online: https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/harvardlawreview.org\/print\/vol-130\/state-v-loomis\/."},{"key":"ref_25","unstructured":"Supreme Court of the United States (2026, February 02). Loomis v. Wisconsin, 137 S. Ct. 2290 (cert. denied). Available online: https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/law.justia.com\/cases\/wisconsin\/supreme-court\/2016\/2015ap000157-cr.html."},{"key":"#cr-split#-ref_26.1","unstructured":"European Parliament, and Council of the European Union (2024). Regulation"},{"key":"#cr-split#-ref_26.2","unstructured":"(EU) 2024\/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Off. J. Eur. Union, L 2024\/1689, 1-144."},{"key":"ref_27","unstructured":"European Parliament (2026, January 21). EU AI Act: First Regulation on Artificial Intelligence, Available online: https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/www.europarl.europa.eu\/topics\/en\/article\/20230601STO93804\/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence."},{"key":"ref_28","first-page":"18","article-title":"Slave to the Algorithm? Why a \u201cRight to an Explanation\u201d Is Probably Not the Remedy You Are Looking for","volume":"16","author":"Edwards","year":"2017","journal-title":"Duke Law Technol. Rev."},{"key":"#cr-split#-ref_29.1","unstructured":"European Parliament, and Council of the European Union (2016). Regulation"},{"key":"#cr-split#-ref_29.2","unstructured":"(EU) 2016\/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data (General Data Protection Regulation). Off. J. Eur. Union, L 119, 1-88."},{"key":"ref_30","unstructured":"Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (2018). Guidelines on Automated Individual Decision-Making and Profiling for the Purposes of Regulation 2016\/679 (WP251rev.01), European Commission."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1093\/idpl\/ipx005","article-title":"Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation","volume":"7","author":"Wachter","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. Data Priv. Law"},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lou, Y., Caruana, R., Gehrke, J., and Hooker, G. (2013, January 11\u201314). Accurate Intelligible Models with Pairwise Interactions. Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Chicago, IL, USA.","DOI":"10.1145\/2487575.2487579"},{"key":"ref_33","unstructured":"Nori, H., Jenkins, S., Koch, P., and Caruana, R. (2019). InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretability. arXiv."},{"key":"ref_34","first-page":"841","article-title":"Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR","volume":"31","author":"Wachter","year":"2018","journal-title":"Harv. J. Law Technol."},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1111\/rssa.12227","article-title":"Interpretable Classification Models for Recidivism Prediction","volume":"180","author":"Zeng","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A"},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1037\/xge0000033","article-title":"Algorithm Aversion: People Erroneously Avoid Algorithms after Seeing Them Err","volume":"144","author":"Dietvorst","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Exp. Psychol. Gen."}],"container-title":["Information"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/www.mdpi.com\/2078-2489\/17\/3\/234\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,3]],"date-time":"2026-03-03T05:24:06Z","timestamp":1772515446000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/www.mdpi.com\/2078-2489\/17\/3\/234"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,1]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]}},"alternative-id":["info17030234"],"URL":"https:\/\/2.zoppoz.workers.dev:443\/https\/doi.org\/10.3390\/info17030234","relation":{},"ISSN":["2078-2489"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2078-2489","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,1]]}}}