Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:1809.03112 (cs)
[Submitted on 10 Sep 2018]

Title:Depth-bounding is effective: Improvements and evaluation of unsupervised PCFG induction

Authors:Lifeng Jin, Finale Doshi-Velez, Timothy Miller, William Schuler, Lane Schwartz
View a PDF of the paper titled Depth-bounding is effective: Improvements and evaluation of unsupervised PCFG induction, by Lifeng Jin and 4 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:There have been several recent attempts to improve the accuracy of grammar induction systems by bounding the recursive complexity of the induction model (Ponvert et al., 2011; Noji and Johnson, 2016; Shain et al., 2016; Jin et al., 2018). Modern depth-bounded grammar inducers have been shown to be more accurate than early unbounded PCFG inducers, but this technique has never been compared against unbounded induction within the same system, in part because most previous depth-bounding models are built around sequence models, the complexity of which grows exponentially with the maximum allowed depth. The present work instead applies depth bounds within a chart-based Bayesian PCFG inducer (Johnson et al., 2007b), where bounding can be switched on and off, and then samples trees with and without bounding. Results show that depth-bounding is indeed significantly effective in limiting the search space of the inducer and thereby increasing the accuracy of the resulting parsing model. Moreover, parsing results on English, Chinese and German show that this bounded model with a new inference technique is able to produce parse trees more accurately than or competitively with state-of-the-art constituency-based grammar induction models.
Comments: EMNLP 2018
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:1809.03112 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:1809.03112v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.03112
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Lifeng Jin [view email]
[v1] Mon, 10 Sep 2018 03:02:46 UTC (237 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Depth-bounding is effective: Improvements and evaluation of unsupervised PCFG induction, by Lifeng Jin and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-09
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Lifeng Jin
Finale Doshi-Velez
Timothy A. Miller
William Schuler
Lane Schwartz
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences