Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Logic in Computer Science

arXiv:2008.02936 (cs)
[Submitted on 7 Aug 2020]

Title:Distilling Programs to Prove Termination

Authors:G.W. Hamilton (Dublin City University)
View PDF
Abstract:The problem of determining whether or not any program terminates was shown to be undecidable by Turing, but recent advances in the area have allowed this information to be determined for a large class of programs. The classic method for deciding whether a program terminates dates back to Turing himself and involves finding a ranking function that maps a program state to a well-order, and then proving that the result of this function decreases for every possible program transition. More recent approaches to proving termination have involved moving away from the search for a single ranking function and toward a search for a set of ranking functions; this set is a choice of ranking functions and a disjunctive termination argument is used. In this paper, we describe a new technique for determining whether programs terminate. Our technique is applied to the output of the distillation program transformation that converts programs into a simplified form called distilled form. Programs in distilled form are converted into a corresponding labelled transition system and termination can be demonstrated by showing that all possible infinite traces through this labelled transition system would result in an infinite descent of well-founded data values. We demonstrate our technique on a number of examples, and compare it to previous work.
Comments: In Proceedings VPT/HCVS 2020, arXiv:2008.02483. This work owes a lot to the input of Neil Jones, who provided many useful insights and ideas on the subject matter presented here
Subjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
ACM classes: F.3.1; D.2.4
Cite as: arXiv:2008.02936 [cs.LO]
  (or arXiv:2008.02936v1 [cs.LO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.02936
Journal reference: EPTCS 320, 2020, pp. 140-154
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.320.10

Submission history

From: EPTCS [view email] [via EPTCS proxy]
[v1] Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:24:20 UTC (49 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-08
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)