Computer Science > Logic in Computer Science
[Submitted on 1 Aug 2021 (v1), last revised 31 Aug 2025 (this version, v13)]
Title:Finitely Bounded Homogeneity Turned Inside-Out
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Deciding the amalgamation property for a given class of finite structures is an important subroutine in classifying countable finitely homogeneous structures. We study the computational complexity of the amalgamation decision problem for finitely bounded classes, i.e., classes specified by a finite set of forbidden finite substructures, or equivalently by a finite set of universal axioms. We link the amalgamation decision problem to the problem of testing the containment between the reducts of two given finitely bounded amalgamation classes to a given common subset of their signatures. On the one hand, this link enables polynomial-time reductions from various decision problems that can be represented within the reduct containment problem for finitely bounded amalgamation classes, e.g., the 2-exponential square tiling problem, leading to a new lower bound for the complexity of the amalgamation decision problem: 2NEXPTIME-hardness. On the other hand, the link also allows us to show that the amalgamation decision problem is decidable under the assumption that every finitely bounded strong amalgamation class has a computable finitely bounded Ramsey expansion. The runtime of our conditional decision procedure depends 2-exponentially on the size of a minimal Ramsey expansion. We subsequently prove that the closely related problem of testing homogenizability is already undecidable, by a polynomial-time reduction from the regularity of context-free languages. Our results indicate that the relationship between finitely bounded amalgamation classes and arbitrary finitely bounded classes shares similarities with the relationship between regular grammars and context-free grammars. A key difference is that the regularity of context-free grammars can be tested in linear time, while the problem of testing the amalgamation property for finitely bounded classes is 2NEXPTIME-hard.
Submission history
From: Jakub Rydval [view email][v1] Sun, 1 Aug 2021 13:11:43 UTC (71 KB)
[v2] Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:37:40 UTC (21 KB)
[v3] Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:12:29 UTC (27 KB)
[v4] Sun, 26 Mar 2023 23:22:50 UTC (42 KB)
[v5] Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:55:23 UTC (42 KB)
[v6] Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:38:09 UTC (49 KB)
[v7] Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:05:01 UTC (611 KB)
[v8] Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:18:17 UTC (139 KB)
[v9] Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:31:56 UTC (139 KB)
[v10] Fri, 14 Feb 2025 13:48:51 UTC (128 KB)
[v11] Mon, 21 Jul 2025 10:12:25 UTC (133 KB)
[v12] Wed, 13 Aug 2025 09:03:16 UTC (133 KB)
[v13] Sun, 31 Aug 2025 17:50:20 UTC (133 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.LO
References & Citations
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.