Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security

arXiv:2603.03376 (cs)
[Submitted on 3 Mar 2026]

Title:Comparison of Credential Management Systems Based on the Standards of IEEE, ETSI, and YD/T 3957-2021

Authors:Abel C. H. Chen
View a PDF of the paper titled Comparison of Credential Management Systems Based on the Standards of IEEE, ETSI, and YD/T 3957-2021, by Abel C. H. Chen
View PDF
Abstract:As V2X (Vehicle-to-Everything) technology becomes increasingly prevalent, the security of V2X networks has garnered growing attention worldwide. In North America, the IEEE 1609 series standards are primarily used, while Europe adopts the ETSI series standards, and China has also established its industry standard, YD/T 3957-2021, among others. Although these standards share some commonalities, they also exhibit differences. To achieve compatibility across these standards, analyzing their similarities and differences is a crucial issue. Therefore, this study focuses on analyzing the three major standards mentioned above, discussing aspects such as certificate formats, signed message formats, and certificate request processes. Additionally, this research evaluates the efficiency of different cryptographic methods, including NIST P-256 and SM2-256, SHA-256 and SM3-256, as well as AES-128 and SM4-128. Finally, the study implements these three major standards on V2X devices and compares the efficiency of message signing and signature verification in V2X systems, providing a reference for the development of a secure certificate management system for V2X networks.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI); Performance (cs.PF)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.03376 [cs.CR]
  (or arXiv:2603.03376v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.03376
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Abel C. H. Chen [view email]
[v1] Tue, 3 Mar 2026 00:19:32 UTC (453 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Comparison of Credential Management Systems Based on the Standards of IEEE, ETSI, and YD/T 3957-2021, by Abel C. H. Chen
  • View PDF
view license

Current browse context:

cs.CR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.NI
cs.PF

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences