Deductive Inference for the Interiors and Exteriors of Horn TheoriesThanks: An extended abstract of this article was presented in Proceedings of Algorithms and Computation, 19th International Symposium (ISAAC 2008), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5369, pp. 390–401, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.

We assume a standard propositional language with atoms ${\mathit{A}t}=\{x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n}\}$, where each $x_{i}$ takes either value $1$ (true) or $0$ (false). A literal is either an atom $x_{i}$ or its negation, which we denote by ${\overline{x}}_{i}$. The opposite of a literal $\ell$ is denoted by ${\overline{\ell}}$, and the opposite of a set of literals $L$ by ${\overline{L}}=\{{\overline{\ell}}\mid\ell\in L\}$. Furthermore, ${\mathit{L}it}={\mathit{A}t}\cup{\overline{{\mathit{A}t}}}$ denotes the set of all literals.

A clause is a disjunction $c=\bigvee_{i\in P(c)}x_{i}\lor\bigvee_{i\in N(c)}{\overline{x}}_{i}$ of literals, where $P(c)$ and $N(c)$ are the sets of indices whose corresponding variables occur positively and negatively in $c$ and $P(c)\cap N(c)=\emptyset$. Dually, a term is conjunction $t=\bigwedge_{i\in P(t)}x_{i}\land\bigwedge_{i\in N(t)}{\overline{x}}_{i}$ of literals, where $P(t)$ and $N(t)$ are similarly defined. We also view clauses and terms as sets of literals. A conjunctive normal form (CNF) is a conjunction of clauses. A clause $c$ is Horn, if $|P(c)|\leq 1$. A theory $\Sigma$ is any set of formulas; it is Horn, if it is a set of Horn clauses. As usual, we identify $\Sigma$ with $\varphi=\bigwedge_{c\in\Sigma}c$, and write $c\in\varphi$ etc. It is known [3] that the deductive query for a Horn theory, i.e., deciding if $\Sigma\models c$ for a clause $c$ is possible in linear time.

We recall that Horn theories have a well-known semantic characterization. A model is a vector $v\!\in\!\{0,1\}^{n}$, whose $i$-th component is denoted by $v_{i}$. For a model $v$, let ${\mathit{O}N}(v)=\{i\mid v_{i}=1\}$ and ${\mathit{O}FF}(v)=\{i\mid v_{i}=0\}$. The value of a formula $\varphi$ on a model $v$, denoted $\varphi(v)$, is inductively defined as usual; satisfaction of $\varphi$ in $v$, i.e., $\varphi(v)=1$, will be denoted by $v\models\varphi$. The set of models of a formula $\varphi$ (resp., theory $\Sigma$), denoted by ${\mathit{m}od}(\varphi)$ (resp., ${\mathit{m}od}(\Sigma)$), and logical consequence $\varphi\models\psi$ (resp., $\Sigma\models\psi$) are defined as usual. For two models $v$ and $w$, we denote by $v\leq w$ the usual componentwise ordering, i.e., $v_{i}\leq w_{i}$ for all $i=1,2,\ldots,n$, where $0\leq 1$; $v<w$ means $v\neq w$ and $v\leq w$. Denote by $v\,\bigwedge\,w$ componentwise AND of models $v,w\in\{0,1\}^{n}$, and by $Cl_{\wedge}({\mathcal{M}})$ the closure of ${\mathcal{M}}\subseteq\{0,1\}^{n}$ under $\,\bigwedge\,$. Then, a theory $\Sigma$ is Horn representable if and only if ${\mathit{m}od}(\Sigma)=Cl_{\wedge}({\mathit{m}od}(\Sigma))$ (see [2, 9]) for proofs).

As discussed by Kautz et al. [7], a Horn theory $\Sigma$ is semantically represented by its characteristic models, where $v\in{\mathit{m}od}(\Sigma)$ is called characteristic (or extreme [2]), if $v\not\in Cl_{\wedge}({\mathit{m}od}(\Sigma)\setminus\{v\})$. The set of all such models, the characteristic set of $\Sigma$, is denoted by ${\mathit{c}har}(\Sigma)$. Note that ${\mathit{c}har}(\Sigma)$ is unique. E.g., $(0101)\in{\mathit{c}har}(\Sigma_{2})$, while $(0000)\notin{\mathit{c}har}(\Sigma_{2})$; we have ${\mathit{c}har}(\Sigma_{2})={\mathcal{M}}_{1}$. It is known [7] that the deductive query for a Horn theory $\Sigma$ from the characteristic set ${\mathit{c}har}(\Sigma)$ can be done in linear time, i.e., $O(n|{\mathit{c}har}(\Sigma)|)$ time.

For a model $v\in\{0,1\}^{n}$ and a nonnegative integer $\alpha$, its $\alpha$-neighborhood is defined by

where $\parallel v\parallel$ denotes $\sum_{i=1}^{n}|v_{i}|$. Note that $|{\mathcal{N}}_{\alpha}(v)|=\sum_{i=0}^{\alpha}{n\choose i}=O(n^{\alpha+1})$. For a theory $\Sigma$ and a nonnegative integer $\alpha$, the $\alpha$-interior and $\alpha$-exterior of $\Sigma$, denoted by $\sigma_{-\alpha}(\Sigma)$ and $\sigma_{\alpha}(\Sigma)$ respectively, are theories defined by

By definition, $\sigma_{0}(\Sigma)=\sigma$, $\sigma_{\alpha}(\Sigma)\models\sigma_{\beta}(\Sigma)$ for integers $\alpha$ and $\beta$ with $\alpha<\beta$, and $\sigma_{\alpha}(\Sigma_{1})\models\sigma_{\alpha}(\Sigma_{2})$ holds for any integer $\alpha$, if two theories $\Sigma_{1}$ and $\Sigma_{2}$ satisfy $\Sigma_{1}\models\Sigma_{2}$.

Makino and Ibaraki [11] introduced the interiors and exteriors to analyze stability of Boolean functions, and studied their basic properties and complexity issues on them (see also [12]). For example, it is known [11] that, for a theory $\Sigma$ and nonnegative integers $\alpha$ and $\beta$, $\sigma_{-\alpha}(\sigma_{-\beta}(\Sigma))=\sigma_{-\alpha-\beta}(\Sigma)$, $\sigma_{\alpha}(\sigma_{\beta}(\Sigma))=\sigma_{\alpha+\beta}(\Sigma)$, and

For a nonnegative integer $\alpha$ and two theories $\Sigma_{1}$ and $\Sigma_{2}$, we have

where $\sigma_{\alpha}(\Sigma_{1}\cup\Sigma_{2})\not=\sigma_{\alpha}(\Sigma_{1})\cup\sigma_{\alpha}(\Sigma_{2})$ holds in general.

As demonstrated in Example 2, it is not difficult to see that the interiors of any Horn theory are Horn, which is, for example, proved by (4) and Lemma 3, while the exteriors might be not Horn.

Let us first consider the deduction for the $\alpha$-interiors of a Horn theory: Given a Horn theory $\Sigma$, a clause $c$, and a positive integer $\alpha$, decide if $\sigma_{-\alpha}(\Sigma)\models c$ holds. We show that the problem is solvable in linear time after showing a series of lemmas.

The following lemma is a basic property of the interiors.

For example, let us consider $c=x_{1}\vee x_{2}\vee{\overline{x}}_{3}\vee{\overline{x}}_{4}$, $\alpha=2$. Then we have $\sigma_{-\alpha}(c)=x_{1}x_{2}{\overline{x}}_{3}\vee x_{1}x_{2}{\overline{x}}_{4}\vee x_{1}{\overline{x}}_{3}\ {\overline{x}}_{4}\vee x_{2}{\overline{x}}_{3}\ {\overline{x}}_{4}=(x_{1}\vee x_{2})(x_{1}\vee{\overline{x}}_{3})(x_{1}\vee{\overline{x}}_{4})(x_{2}\vee{\overline{x}}_{3})(x_{2}\vee{\overline{x}}_{4})({\overline{x}}_{3}\vee{\overline{x}}_{4})$.

This lemma, together with (4), implies that for a CNF $\varphi$ and a nonnegative integer $\alpha$, we have

where we regard $c$ as a set of literals.

By Lemmas 4 and 5, we can easily answer the deductive queries, if $\Sigma$ satisfies certain conditions mentioned in them. In the remaining case, we have the following lemma.

From this lemma, we have only to check a deductive query $\sigma_{-\alpha}(\Sigma)\models c\vee{\overline{x}}_{j}$, instead of $\sigma_{-\alpha}(\Sigma)\models c$. Since $|c|<|c\vee{\overline{x}}_{j}|\leq n$, we can answer the deduction by checking the conditions in Lemmas 4 and 5 at most $n$ times.

We can see that a straightforward implementation of the algorithm requires $O(n(\parallel\!\!\Sigma\!\!\parallel+|c|))$ time, where $\parallel\!\!\Sigma\!\!\parallel$ denotes the length of $\Sigma$, i.e., $\parallel\!\!\Sigma\!\!\parallel=\sum_{d\in\Sigma}|d|$. However, it is not difficult to see that we have a linear time algorithm for the problem, if $N(d)\setminus N$ for $d\in\Sigma$ is maintained by using the proper data structure.

Let us next consider the deduction for the $\alpha$-exteriors of a Horn theory. In contrast to the interior case, we have the following negative result.

We remark that this result can also be derived from the ones in [11].

However, by using the next lemma, a deductive query can be answered in polynomial time, if $\alpha$ or $N(c)$ is small.

From Lemma 9, the deductive query for the $\alpha$-interior of a theory $\Sigma$, i.e., $\sigma_{\alpha}(\Sigma)\models c$ for a given clause $c$ is equivalent to the condition that $\Sigma\models\sigma_{-\alpha}(c)$. Since we have $\sigma_{-\alpha}(c)=\bigwedge_{{S\subseteq c:}\atop{|S|=|c|-\alpha}}\bigl(\bigvee_{\ell\in S}\ell\bigr)$ by Lemma 3, the deductive query for the $\alpha$-interior can be done by checking ${{|c|}\choose{\alpha}}$ deductions for $\Sigma$. More precisely, we have the following lemma.

This lemma implies that the deductive query can be answered by checking the number of $j$’s in $P(c)$ that satisfy $\Sigma\models\bigvee_{i\in S}{\overline{x}}_{i}\vee x_{j}$ for each $S$. Since we can check this condition in linear time and there are $\sum_{p=0}^{\alpha}{{|N(c)|}\choose{p}}$ such $S$’s, we have the following result, which complements Theorem 8 that the problem is intractable, even if $P(c)=\emptyset$.

We first present an algorithm to solve the deduction problem for the interiors of Horn theories. The algorithm requires exponential time in general, but it is polynomial when $\alpha$ is small.

Let $\Sigma$ be a Horn theory given by its characteristic set ${\mathit{c}har}(\Sigma)$, and let $c$ be a clause. Then for a nonnegative integer $\alpha$, we have

Let $v^{*}$ be a unique minimal model such that $c(v^{*})=0$ (i.e., ${\overline{c}}(v^{*})=1$). By the definition of interiors, $v^{*}$ is a model of $\sigma_{-\alpha}(\Sigma)$ if and only if all $v$’s in ${\mathcal{N}}_{\alpha}(v^{*})$ are models of $\Sigma$. Therefore, for each model $v$ in ${\mathcal{N}}_{\alpha}(v^{*})$, we check if $v\in{\mathit{m}od}(\Sigma)$, which is equivalent to

If (7) holds for all models $v$ in ${\mathcal{N}}_{\alpha}(v^{*})$, then we can immediately conclude by (6) that $\sigma_{-\alpha}(\Sigma)\not\models c$. On the other hand, if there exists a model $v$ in ${\mathcal{N}}_{\alpha}(v^{*})$ such that (7) does not hold, let $J=ON(\bigwedge_{w\in{\mathit{c}har}(\Sigma)\atop w\geq v}w)\setminus ON(v)$. By definition, we have $J\not=\emptyset$, and we can see that

If $J\cap N(c)\not=\emptyset$, then by Lemma 3 and (8), we have $\sigma_{-\alpha}(\Sigma)\models\bigvee_{i\in ON(v)\cap N(c)}{\overline{x}}_{i}$, since $|ON(v)\setminus N(c)|\leq\alpha-1$. This implies $\sigma_{-\alpha}(\Sigma)\models c$. On the other hand, if $J\cap N(c)=\emptyset$, then by Lemma 3 and (8), we have $\sigma_{-\alpha}(\Sigma)\models\bigvee_{i\in N(c)}{\overline{x}}_{i}\vee x_{j}$ for all $j\in J$. Thus, if $J$ contains an index in $P(c)$, then we can conclude that $\sigma_{-\alpha}(\Sigma)\models c$; Otherwise, we check the condition $\sigma_{-\alpha}(\Sigma)\models c\vee\bigvee_{j\in J}{\overline{x}}_{j}$, instead of $\sigma_{-\alpha}(\Sigma)\models c$. Since a new clause $d=c\vee\bigvee_{j\in J}{\overline{x}}_{j}$ is longer than $c$, after at most $n$ iterations, we can answer the deductive query. Formally, our algorithm can be described as Algorithm 2.

However, in general, the problem is intractable, which contrasts with the formula-model representation.