arXiv is now an independent nonprofit! Learn more
License: arXiv.org perpetual non-exclusive license
arXiv:1906.00215v2 [physics.app-ph] 17 Jun 2019

Space-Time Modulated Loaded-Wire Metagratings for Magnetless Nonreciprocity and Near-Complete Frequency ConversionPreprint: APS/123-QED

Yakir Hadad Email: hadady@eng.tau.ac.il Affiliation: School of Electrical Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Tel-Aviv, Israel, 69978    Dimitrios Sounas Affiliation: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
August 11, 2026
Abstract

In recent years a significant progress has been made in the development of magnet-less nonreciprocity using space-time modulation, both in electromagnetics and acoustics. This approach has so far resulted in a plethora of non-reciprocal devices, such as isolators and circulators, over different parts of the spectrum, for guided waves. On the other hand, very little work has been performed on non-reciprocal devices for waves propagating in free space, which can also have many practical applications. For example, it was shown theoretically that non-reciprocal scattering by a metasurface can be obtained if the surface-impedance operator is continuously modulated in space and time. However, the main challenge in the realization of such a metasurface is due to the high complexity required to modulate in space and time many sub-wavelength unit-cells of which the metasurface consists. In this paper we show that spatiotemporally modulated metagratings can lead to strong nonreciprocal responses, despite the fact that they are based on electrically-large unit cells. We specifically focus on wire metagratings loaded with time-modulated capacitances. We use the discrete-dipole-approximation and an ad-hoc generalization of the theory of polarizability for time-modulated particles, and demonstrate an effective nonreciprocal anomalous reflection (diffraction) with an efficient frequency conversion. Thus, our work opens a venue towards a practical design and implementation of highly non-reciprocal magnet-less metasurfaces in electromagnetics and acoustics.

pacs
Valid PACS appear here

I Introduction

In recent years substantial efforts have been devoted towards the development of magnet-less non-reciprocal devices in electromagnetics as well as in acoustics Tanaka1965; Ayasli1989; Gallo2001; Kodera2011; Sounas2013; Wang2012; Popa2012; Manipatruni2009; Mazor2019_2; Fleury2014. In particular, space-time modulated structures have been explored theoretically and experimentally for this purpose Qin2014; Reiskarimian2016; Yu2009; Lira2012; Qin2016; Sounas2013_2; Estep2014. These designs are based on the creation of a synthetic sense of motion Mazor2019 that fundamentally enables the breach of time-reversal symmetry with respect to the guiding-wave sub-system. While the major part of these efforts has been dedicated to breaking reciprocity in guiding wave structures, some important focus has been also aimed at the violation of reciprocity in scattering and radiation Hadad2015; Hadad2016; Taravati2017; Taravati2017_2. For example in Hadad2016 a space-time modulated travelling wave antenna with different radiation patterns in transmit and receive mode was studied theoretically and experimentally. In that antenna, a few voltage varying capacitors were used to establish the required modulation. The underlying idea of this design is to amplify the effect of the spatiotemporal modulation by taking advantage of asymmetric interband transitions between different space-time harmonics of a mode inside and outside the light-cone. Thus, in a sense, the natural sharp filtering property of the light cone has been used to enhance the nonreciprocal effect in this low-Q leaky wave antenna system. In another work Hadad2015, a metasurface that consists of a space-time modulated impedance operator has been explored theoretically. In that proposal non-reciprocal Wood’s anomaly has been achieved through a careful design of the space-time modulation of the surface characteristics. However, unlike the antenna in Ref. Hadad2016 which required a small number of modulation actuators, for the emulation of the effective surface impedance in Hadad2015, an unrealistically, extremely complex configuration of voltage varying capacitors and dense wiring system is required to achieve the many different modulation regions.

A possible venue to overcome this issue may be based on using metagratings which are metasurfaces with electrically large unit cells. Metagratings Chalabi2017; Radi2017; Epstein2017; Rabinovich2018; Popov2018; Popov2019; Popov2019b; Epstein2018; Diaz-Rubio2017; Taravati2019, a close relative of frequency selective surfaces and diffraction gratings, have been explored recently as another means to overcome the challenge of perfect anomalous reflection and refraction by an electrically thin metasurface Yu2011; Monticone2013; Li2014; Pfeiffer2013; Selvanayagam2013; Selvanayagam2013_2; Pfeiffer2013_2; Sievenpiper2002; Hasman2003; Lin2014; Wong2014; Kim2014; Epstein2016; Epstein2014; Epstein2016_2; Dorrah2018; Sounas_Estakhri2016. As opposed to the traditional metasurface approach in which electrically deep subwavelength unit cells are involved, the unit cell of the metagrating is 𝒪(λ/2){\cal O}(\lambda/2) or more and thus fundamentally gives rise to propagating diffraction orders. Then, a proper design of the metagrating’s unit-cell enables a significant control over the balance of the various propagating diffraction orders, and in particular makes it possible to nullify the zero order harmonic which corresponds to regular reflection and refraction. Moreover, recently, an interesting proposal for a dielectric slab metagrating with space-time modulated refractive index has been explored demonstrating a peculiar relations between the space-time harmonics in this system Taravati2019. In particular, non-reciprocal scattering has been theoretically demonstrated. Nonetheless, a realistic implementation of space-time modulated refractive index is challenging and requires either nonlinear media with significant pump power or the use of effective medium, e.g., using a dense array of unit-cells that are loaded by voltage-varying capacitors. Thus, unfortunately raising again the challenge of realizability.

Here, inspired by the recent progress in metagratings Chalabi2017; Radi2017; Epstein2017; Rabinovich2018; Popov2018; Popov2019; Popov2019b; Epstein2018; Diaz-Rubio2017; Taravati2019, we propose a solution to this problem and design efficient non-reciprocal metasurfaces by using only a minimal number of three distinct modulation regions and small modulation parameters. Specifically, we develop a rigourous theory for metagratings with time-modulated resonant elements. Using this approach we explore analytically a two-dimensional lattice of resonant, capacitively loaded, wires that are subject to space-time modulation. To that end we first develop a generalization of polarizability theory for time-modulated particles, and later exploit it together with the discrete-dipole approximation Draine1994; Tretyakov_Book; Hadad2013; Hadad2010; Mazor2012; Mazor2015 and the proper Green’s function to explore analytically the scattering from an infinite space-time modulated metagratings. We particularly show that non-reciprocal anomalous reflection can be achieved with nearly perfect coupling efficiency between the incident wave and the desired scattered wave. As opposed to anomalous reflection obtained by a stationary metagratings, here, the anomalous reflection process involves also an efficient frequency conversion process.

II The generalized polarizability of time-modulated loaded wire

Consider a periodically loaded perfect electrically conducting (PEC) wire that is co-aligned with the zz-axis as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). The wire radius is r0r_{0}, the loading impedance is ZLZ_{L}, and the loading periodicity is small on the wavelength, i.e., Δλ\Delta\ll\lambda. Now let 𝐄(ω)=z^E(ω){\bf{E}}(\omega)=\hat{z}E(\omega) be the electric field at the wire location but in the absence of the wire itself. Then, the induced current on the wire is given by Tretyakov_Book

I(ω)=α(ω)E(ω)I(\omega)=\alpha(\omega)E(\omega) (1)

with the effective susceptibilityComm α\alpha,

α1(ω)=α01(ω)+ZLΔ\alpha^{-1}(\omega)=\alpha^{-1}_{0}(\omega)+\frac{Z_{L}}{\Delta} (2)

where

α01(ω)=ηk4H0(2)(kr0)\alpha_{0}^{-1}(\omega)=\frac{\eta k}{4}H_{0}^{(2)}\left(kr_{0}\right) (3)

is the susceptibility of an unloaded PEC wire. In Eq. (3), η=120πΩ\eta=120\pi\Omega and k=ω/ck=\omega/c are the free space impedance and wavenumber, respectively. Also, ω\omega is the radial frequency, cc is the speed of light in vacuum, and H0(2)H_{0}^{(2)} is zero order Hankel function of the second kind. To simplify subsequent notations, in the following we use

γ(ω)=1α(ω).\gamma(\omega)=\frac{1}{\alpha(\omega)}. (4)

Then, for capacitive periodic loading we can write

γ(ω)=γ0(ω)+1jωCΔ\gamma(\omega)=\gamma_{0}(\omega)+\frac{1}{j\omega C\Delta} (5)

where CC is the per-unit-length loading capacitance.

Up to this point the formulation has been strictly carried out in the frequency domain. However, in the following we shall introduce temporal modulation of the loading capacitor. We assume

1C(t)=1C0[1+mcos(ωmt+ϕ)],\frac{1}{C(t)}=\frac{1}{C_{0}}\left[1+m\cos(\omega_{m}t+\phi)\right], (6)

where ωm\omega_{m} is the modulation frequency, mm is the modulation index and ϕ\phi is the modulation phase shift between the wires in the meta-grating structure. To model the scattering process in this case it is required to repeat the previous derivation, but in the time-domain. To that end we use the convolution property of the Fourier transform on Eq. (1) with Eq. (4). We have

(t)=γ(t)(t)=γ(τ)(tτ)𝑑τ{\cal E}(t)=\gamma(t)*{\cal I}(t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\gamma(\tau){\cal I}(t-\tau)d\tau (7)

where (t),γ(t){\cal E}(t),\gamma(t), and (t){\cal I}(t) are the time domain counterparts of E(ω),γ(ω)E(\omega),\gamma(\omega), and I(ω)I(\omega), respectively, and * denotes convolution as defined in Eq. (7). By explicitly expanding Eq. (7) using Eq. (5), we get

(t)\displaystyle{\cal E}(t) =\displaystyle= γ0(t)(t)+1ΔC(t)1{I(ω)jω}(t)\displaystyle\gamma_{0}(t)*{\cal I}(t)+\frac{1}{\Delta C(t)}{\cal F}^{-1}\left\{\frac{I(\omega)}{j\omega}\right\}(t) (8)
=\displaystyle= γ0(t)(t)+1ΔC(t)t(τ)𝑑τ\displaystyle\gamma_{0}(t)*{\cal I}(t)+\frac{1}{\Delta C(t)}\int_{-\infty}^{t}{\cal I}(\tau)d\tau (9)

Here 1{\cal F}^{-1} stand for the inverse Fourier transform. In the last equality we used the identity 1{I(ω)/jω}=t(τ)𝑑τ0.5I(ω)|ω=0{\cal F}^{-1}\{I(\omega)/j\omega\}=\int_{-\infty}^{t}{\cal I}(\tau)d\tau-0.5I(\omega)|_{\omega=0}, together with the fact I(ω)|ω=0=0I(\omega)|_{\omega=0}=0 (implying no DC currents in the problem).

Figure 1: Illustration of the problem. (a) Temporally modulated capacitively loaded wire, co-aligned with the zz-axis. (b) A space time modulated metagratings wire array above a perfect electrically conducting plate. Here, the spatial periodicity is N=3N=3, the minimal required to achieve non-reciprocity by synthetic motion.

Assuming that the exciting field is harmonic at frequency ω\omega, then, due to modulation at ωm\omega_{m}, the induced current and the electric field in the problem may be expressed by

𝒳(t)=12n=𝒳nejωnt+c.c.{\cal X}(t)=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}{\cal X}_{n}e^{j\omega_{n}t}+c.c. (10)

where 𝒳{\cal X} stands for either {\cal I} or {\cal E}, and 𝒳n{\cal X}_{n} denotes the complex coefficient of n’th harmonic at ωn=ω+nωm\omega_{n}=\omega+n\omega_{m}. Next, in order to obtain a difference equation that relates between the different harmonics of the exciting electric field and the induced current, we apply Eq. (10) in Eq. (8). Beginning with the last term in Eq. (8), we find after a simple derivation,

1C(t)t(τ)dτ=12C0n=ejωnt[njωn+\displaystyle\frac{1}{C(t)}\int_{-\infty}^{t}{\cal I}(\tau)d\tau=\frac{1}{2C_{0}}\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\!\!{e^{j\omega_{n}t}}\!\!\left[\frac{{\cal I}_{n}}{j\omega_{n}}+\right.
m2ejϕn1jωn1+m2ejϕn+1jωn+1]+c.c.\displaystyle\left.\frac{m}{2}e^{j\phi}\frac{{\cal I}_{n-1}}{j\omega_{n-1}}+\frac{m}{2}e^{-j\phi}\frac{{\cal I}_{n+1}}{j\omega_{n+1}}\right]\!+\!c.c. (11)

Next, we evaluate the first term in Eq. (8). To that end we use the convolution identity

γ0(t)(t)=1{γ0(ω)I(ω)}\gamma_{0}(t)*{\cal I}(t)={\cal F}^{-1}\left\{\gamma_{0}(\omega)I(\omega)\right\} (12)

with the Fourier transform of Eq. (10) (here, 𝒳={\cal X}={\cal I})

I(ω)=12n=nδ(ωωn)+c.c.I(\omega)=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}{\cal I}_{n}\delta(\omega-\omega_{n})+c.c. (13)

Therefore leading to

γ0(t)(t)=12n=nγ0(ωn)ejωnt+c.c.\gamma_{0}(t)*{\cal I}(t)=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}{\cal I}_{n}\gamma_{0}(\omega_{n})e^{j\omega_{n}t}+c.c. (14)

Finally, by combining Eqs. (14) and (II) in Eq. (8) and with Eq. (10), we get

n=nγ0(ωn)+\displaystyle{\cal E}_{n}={\cal I}_{n}\gamma_{0}(\omega_{n})+ (15)
+\displaystyle+ 1ΔC0[njωn+m2ejϕn1jωn1+m2ejϕn+1jωn+1].\displaystyle\frac{1}{\Delta C_{0}}\left[\frac{{\cal I}_{n}}{j\omega_{n}}+\frac{m}{2}e^{j\phi}\frac{{\cal I}_{n-1}}{j\omega_{n-1}}+\frac{m}{2}e^{-j\phi}\frac{{\cal I}_{n+1}}{j\omega_{n+1}}\right].

Using Eq. (15) it is possible to define a “generalized” effective susceptibility α\alpha for time-modulated wires. In this case, α\alpha becomes a matrix that relates between the electric field and the induced currents in different harmonics. For example, if we choose to take into account only three harmonics, n=0,±1n=0,\pm 1, that is at ω0=ω,ω±1=ω±ωm\omega_{0}=\omega,\omega_{\pm 1}=\omega\pm\omega_{m} we get

𝐈~=α¯¯𝐄~\tilde{{\bf{I}}}=\underline{\underline{\alpha}}\tilde{{\bf{E}}} (16)

where 𝐄~=[1,0,1]T\tilde{{\bf{E}}}=[{\cal E}_{-1},{\cal E}_{0},{\cal E}_{1}]^{T} and 𝐈~=[1,0,1]T\tilde{{\bf{I}}}=[{\cal I}_{-1},{\cal I}_{0},{\cal I}_{1}]^{T}, and

α¯¯1=[γ0(ω1)+1jΔC0ω1mejϕ2jΔC0ω00mejϕ2jΔC0ω1γ0(ω0)+1jΔC0ω0mejϕ2jΔC0ω10mejϕ2jΔC0ω0γ0(ω1)+1jΔC0ω1]\underline{\underline{\alpha}}^{-1}=\begin{bmatrix}\gamma_{0}(\omega_{-1})+\dfrac{1}{j\Delta C_{0}\omega_{-1}}&\dfrac{me^{-j\phi}}{2j\Delta C_{0}\omega_{0}}&0\\ \\ \dfrac{me^{j\phi}}{2j\Delta C_{0}\omega_{-1}}&\gamma_{0}(\omega_{0})+\dfrac{1}{j\Delta C_{0}\omega_{0}}&\dfrac{me^{-j\phi}}{2j\Delta C_{0}\omega_{1}}\\ \\ 0&\dfrac{me^{j\phi}}{2j\Delta C_{0}\omega_{0}}&\gamma_{0}(\omega_{1})+\dfrac{1}{j\Delta C_{0}\omega_{1}}\end{bmatrix} (17)

III A Linear Array of Time-Modulated Capacitively Loaded Wires

Consider a linear array of capacitively loaded time-modulated wires, located at y=hy=h, above an infinite PEC plate that is placed on the y=0y=0 plane. The inter-wire spacing is aa and the wires are loaded with capacitors C(t)C(t), as in Eq. (6), with

ϕ=2πlN\phi=-\frac{2\pi l}{N} (18)

where ll\in\mathbb{Z} is the wire index and NN is the spatial periodicity. For simplicity, in the following we shall assume that N=3N=3, which is the minimal spatial periodicity that is required to achieve the effect of a synthetic motion, and thus, non-reciprocity. An illustration of the structure in this case is shown in Fig. 1(b).

III.1 Formulation of the excitation dynamics

The lattice is excited by an impinging plane wave

𝐄i(𝐫;ω)=z^Eiej𝐤i𝐫{\bf{E}}^{i}({\bf{r}};\omega)=\hat{z}E^{i}e^{-j{\bf{k}}^{i}\cdot{\bf{r}}} (19)

where 𝐫=(x,y){\bf{r}}=(x,y), 𝐤i=(kxi,kyi){\bf{k}}^{i}=(k^{i}_{x},-k^{i}_{y}) where kix=ksinθik^{i}_{x}=k\sin\theta^{i} and kiy=kcosθik^{i}_{y}=k\cos\theta^{i} and with 90<θi<90-90^{\circ}<\theta^{i}<90^{\circ} being the angle of incidence with respect to the normal y^\hat{y}. Clearly, θi\theta^{i} is positive (negative) for waves with positive (negative) kxk_{x} component of the wavenumber. See Fig. 1(b).

Using the generalized time-modulated susceptibility concept developed in the previous section, the equation of dynamics for the infinite array can be expressed as

α¯¯l1𝐈~l\displaystyle\underline{\underline{\alpha}}_{l}^{-1}\tilde{{\bf{I}}}_{l} =\displaystyle= 𝐄~i(𝐫l)\displaystyle\tilde{{\bf{E}}}^{i}({\bf{r}}_{l}) (20)
+\displaystyle+ llG¯¯(|𝐫l𝐫l|)𝐈~llG¯¯(|𝐫l𝐫li|)𝐈~l.\displaystyle\sum_{l^{\prime}\neq l}\underline{\underline{G}}(|{\bf{r}}_{l}-{\bf{r}}_{l^{\prime}}|)\tilde{{\bf{I}}}_{l^{\prime}}-\sum_{l^{\prime}}\underline{\underline{G}}(|{\bf{r}}_{l}-{\bf{r}}_{l^{\prime}}^{i}|)\tilde{{\bf{I}}}_{l^{\prime}}.

Here α¯¯l\underline{\underline{\alpha}}_{l} is the generalized susceptibility of the ll-th wire, and G¯¯\underline{\underline{G}} is the two-dimensional free-space Green’s function evaluated at each of the intermodulation frequencies. Thus, in general,

G¯¯=diag[,Gn1,Gn,Gn+1,]\underline{\underline{G}}=\mbox{diag}[...,G_{n-1},G_{n},G_{n+1},...] (21)

where

Gn(|rr|)=ηkn4H0(2)(kn|rr|)G_{n}(|r-r^{\prime}|)=\frac{-\eta k_{n}}{4}H_{0}^{(2)}(k_{n}|r-r^{\prime}|) (22)

with kn=ωn/ck_{n}=\omega_{n}/c, and 𝐫=(x,y),𝐫=(x,y){\bf{r}}=(x,y),{\bf{r}}^{\prime}=(x^{\prime},y^{\prime}) are the locations of the observer and the source, respectively. In Eq. (20) rl=(h,la)r_{l}=(h,la) is the locations of the ll-th wire on the (x,y)(x,y) plane, and rli=(h,la)r_{l}^{i}=(-h,la) is the location of the image by the PEC plate of the ll-th wire. Thus, in Eq. (20) we use image theory in order to replace the original problem with a new problem in which all the wires are located in free space. For this reason, the generalized susceptibility developed in the previous section for a wire in free-space is still valid. However, it is essential to write correctly the incident field in this case. The latter consists of the impinging wave which is given in Eq. (19), plus the reflected wave from the PEC plate in the absence of the wire array. Specifically, on 𝐫l=(al,h){\bf{r}}_{l}=(al,h) for the case of N=3N=3, and after taking into account only the three low order harmonics n=0,±1n=0,\pm 1, the incident field in Eq. (20) reads,

𝐄~i(𝐫l)=[0,2jEisin(kyih)ejkxial,0]T\tilde{{\bf{E}}}^{i}({\bf{r}}_{l})=[0,2jE^{i}\sin(k^{i}_{y}h)e^{-jk^{i}_{x}al},0]^{T} (23)

highlighting the fact that there are no intermodulation frequencies in the incident wave.

III.2 The induced currents

Due to Floquet-Bloch theorem, the nn-th harmonic of the induced current on the ll-th wire is given by

n,l=𝒜nejψnl.{\cal I}_{n,l}={\cal A}_{n}e^{-j\psi_{n}l}. (24)

where

ψn=kxia+2πn3.\psi_{n}=k_{x}^{i}a+\frac{2\pi n}{3}. (25)

Consistent with previous approximation of week temporal modulation, we keep only the three fundamental harmonics, n=0,±1n=0,\pm 1, and write,

𝐈~l=[1,l,0,l,1,l]T.\tilde{{\bf{I}}}_{l}=[{\cal I}_{-1,l},{\cal I}_{0,l},{\cal I}_{1,l}]^{T}. (26)

This solution anzats is applied in the infinite summations of Eq. (20). Beginning with the first summation in Eq. (20), for a specific harmonic nn, and following similar derivation as in Tretyakov_Book, we have

llGn(|𝐫l𝐫l|)n,l=2𝒜nejψnl(ηkn4)S1(n)\sum_{l^{\prime}\neq l}G_{n}(|{\bf{r}}_{l}-{\bf{r}}_{l^{\prime}}|){\cal I}_{n,l^{\prime}}=2{\cal A}_{n}e^{-j\psi_{n}l}\left(-\frac{\eta k_{n}}{4}\right)S_{1}^{(n)} (27)

where

S1(n)=s=1H0(2)(knas)cos(ψns)=1β0na12+\displaystyle S^{(n)}_{1}=\sum_{s=1}^{\infty}H_{0}^{(2)}(k_{n}as)\cos(\psi_{n}s)=\frac{1}{\beta_{0n}a}-\frac{1}{2}+
jπ[ln(kna4π)+γ+12m0(2πjβmna1|m|)]\displaystyle\frac{j}{\pi}\left[\ln\left(\frac{k_{n}a}{4\pi}\right)+\gamma+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{m\neq 0}\left(\frac{-2\pi j}{\beta_{mn}a}-\frac{1}{|m|}\right)\right] (28)

and with

βmn=kn2(2πma+ψna)2,{βmn}0.\beta_{mn}=\sqrt{k_{n}^{2}-\left(\frac{2\pi m}{a}+\frac{\psi_{n}}{a}\right)^{2}},\quad\Im\{\beta_{mn}\}\leq 0. (29)

The second summation in Eq. (20) is treated using a conventional Poisson summation as in Tretyakov_Book.

lGn(|𝐫l𝐫li|)n,l=𝒜nejψnl(ηkn4)S2(n)\displaystyle\sum_{l^{\prime}}G_{n}(|{\bf{r}}_{l}-{\bf{r}}_{l^{\prime}}^{i}|){\cal I}_{n,l^{\prime}}={\cal A}_{n}e^{-j\psi_{n}l}\left(-\frac{\eta k_{n}}{4}\right)S_{2}^{(n)} (30)

where

S2(n)\displaystyle S^{(n)}_{2} =\displaystyle= s=H0(2)(kn|s|2a2+4h2)ejψns\displaystyle\sum_{s=-\infty}^{\infty}H_{0}^{(2)}(k_{n}\sqrt{|s|^{2}a^{2}+4h^{2}})e^{j\psi_{n}s} (31)
=\displaystyle= 2am=ej2βmnhβmn\displaystyle\frac{2}{a}\sum_{m=-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{e^{-j2\beta_{mn}h}}{\beta_{mn}}

with βmn\beta_{mn} as defined in Eq. (29). Once the summations are evaluated, using Eq. (20) it is possible to write an equation for the unknown excitation amplitudes 𝒜n{\cal A}_{n}. Consistent with previous notations we denote

𝐀~=[,𝒜n1,𝒜n,𝒜n+1,]T.\tilde{{\bf{A}}}=[...,{\cal A}_{n-1},{\cal A}_{n},{\cal A}_{n+1},...]^{T}. (33)

Taking into account only three harmonics n=0,±1n=0,\pm 1, we end up with solving the following linear equation for the excitation amplitudes at each harmonics,

(M¯¯R¯¯)𝐀~=𝐄~i(𝐫0)(\underline{\underline{M}}-\underline{\underline{R}})\tilde{{\bf{A}}}=\tilde{{\bf{E}}}^{i}({\bf{r}}_{0}) (34)

with

M¯¯=[γ0(ω1)+1jΔC0ω1m2jΔC0ω00m2jΔC0ω1γ0(ω0)+1jΔC0ω0+m2jΔC0ω10m2jΔC0ω0γ0(ω1)+1jΔC0ω1]\underline{\underline{M}}=\begin{bmatrix}\gamma_{0}(\omega_{-1})+\dfrac{1}{j\Delta C_{0}\omega_{-1}}&\dfrac{m}{2j\Delta C_{0}\omega_{0}}&0\\ \\ \dfrac{m}{2j\Delta C_{0}\omega_{-1}}&\gamma_{0}(\omega_{0})+\dfrac{1}{j\Delta C_{0}\omega_{0}}+&\dfrac{m}{2j\Delta C_{0}\omega_{1}}\\ \\ 0&\dfrac{m}{2j\Delta C_{0}\omega_{0}}&\gamma_{0}(\omega_{1})+\dfrac{1}{j\Delta C_{0}\omega_{1}}\end{bmatrix} (35)

and

R¯¯=η4diag[k1S(1),k0S(0),k1S(1)]\underline{\underline{R}}=\frac{\eta}{4}\mbox{diag}[k_{-1}S^{(-1)},k_{0}S^{(0)},k_{1}S^{(1)}] (36)

and 𝐄~i(𝐫0)=𝐄~i(𝐫l)\tilde{{\bf{E}}}^{i}({\bf{r}}_{0})=\tilde{{\bf{E}}}^{i}({\bf{r}}_{l}) of Eq. (23) at l=0l=0.

III.3 The total fields

The total fields contain different contributions from the impinging and reflected wave by the PEC plate, as well as, of course, by the scattering due to the wires. Thus, the total field at the nn-th harmonic reads

Ez,n=Eiej(kxixkyiy)Eiej(kxix+kyiy)+\displaystyle E_{z,n}=E^{i}e^{-j(k_{x}^{i}x-k_{y}^{i}y)}-E^{i}e^{-j(k_{x}^{i}x+k_{y}^{i}y)}+
ηkn4𝒜nl=[H0(2)(kn(xla)2+(yh)2)ejψnl\displaystyle-\frac{\eta k_{n}}{4}{\cal A}_{n}\sum_{l=-\infty}^{\infty}\left[H_{0}^{(2)}\left(k_{n}\sqrt{(x-la)^{2}+(y-h)^{2}}\right)e^{-j\psi_{n}l}\right.
H0(2)(kn(xla)2+(y+h)2)ejψnl]\displaystyle-\left.H_{0}^{(2)}\left(k_{n}\sqrt{(x-la)^{2}+(y+h)^{2}}\right)e^{-j\psi_{n}l}\right] (37)

After applying Poisson summation and separating between the specular reflection term and the higher diffraction harmonics, the total field above y=hy=h are given by

Ez,n=Eiej(kxixkyiy)δn+m=Emnrej(kx,mnx+βmny)E_{z,n}=E^{i}e^{-j(k_{x}^{i}x-k_{y}^{i}y)}\delta_{n}+\sum_{m=-\infty}^{\infty}E^{r}_{mn}{e^{-j(k_{x,mn}x+\beta_{mn}y)}} (38)

with

Emnr=Eiδnjηknsin(βmnh)βmna𝒜nE^{r}_{mn}=-E^{i}\delta_{n}-\frac{j\eta k_{n}\sin(\beta_{mn}h)}{\beta_{mn}a}{\cal A}_{n} (39)

where δn\delta_{n} is the delta of Kronecker, δn=1\delta_{n}=1 for n=0n=0 and δn=0\delta_{n}=0 otherwise, 𝒜n{\cal A}_{n} is found as a solution to Eq. (34), and kx,mnk_{x,mn} and βmn\beta_{mn} are the xx and yy components of the propagation wavevector. The former is given by

kx,mn=2πma+ψnak_{x,mn}=\frac{2\pi m}{a}+\frac{\psi_{n}}{a} (40)

whereas the latter by Eq. (29). Clearly, kx,mnk_{x,mn} and βmn\beta_{mn} satisfy the free-space dispersion relation kx,mn2+βmn2=kn2k_{x,mn}^{2}+\beta_{mn}^{2}=k_{n}^{2}.

III.4 Space-time diffraction orders

From Eq. (38) together with Eq. (29) it is clear that in the space-time modulated metagrating structure, diffraction lobes are a consequence of the geometrical periodicity aa as well as of the spatial and temporal modulation periodicity. Specifically, propagating diffraction order of spatial order mm and temporal order nn will exists if

|2πa[m+n3]+kxi|<ω+nωnc\left|\frac{2\pi}{a}\left[m+\frac{n}{3}\right]+k_{x}^{i}\right|<\frac{\omega+n\omega_{n}}{c} (41)

which boils down to either

0m+n3+a~sinθia~+nδa~\displaystyle 0\leq m+\frac{n}{3}+\tilde{a}\sin\theta^{i}\leq\tilde{a}+n\delta\tilde{a}
or
a~nδa~m+n3+a~sinθi0\displaystyle-\tilde{a}-n\delta\tilde{a}\leq m+\frac{n}{3}+\tilde{a}\sin\theta^{i}\leq 0 (42)

where a~=a/λ\tilde{a}=a/\lambda and δ=ωm/ω\delta=\omega_{m}/\omega. Propagating reflected wave harmonics propagate at angle

θmn=sin1(kx,mn/kn)\theta_{mn}=\sin^{-1}(k_{x,mn}/k_{n}) (43)

measured with respect to the yy axis, where for reflected waves θ\theta is defined as positive/negative for wavenumbers in the first/second xyxy quadrant. Note that for the incoming, impinging wave, the definition is opposite.

Now it is clear that in order to cancel specular reflection at the incident wave frequency it is required to nullify, or at least minimize, the following term that consists of the specular reflection by the PEC plate and the n=0n=0 temporal harmonic of the m=0m=0 spatial harmonic. That is,

Eijηkasin(kyih)kyiA0=0-E^{i}-\frac{j\eta k}{a}\frac{\sin(k_{y}^{i}h)}{k_{y}^{i}}A_{0}=0 (44)

where A0A_{0} is given by solving Eq. (34).

III.5 Energy balance

The net power flux carried by the mnmn propagating reflected harmonics through the y=hy=h plane is given by

Smn=cosθmn|Emnr|2η.S_{mn}=\cos\theta_{mn}\frac{|E^{r}_{mn}|^{2}}{\eta}. (45)

In a lossless, passive, and stationary metagratings system it is required that the net outgoing flux will be equal to the net incoming flux by the impinging wave. In our system, however, due to the parameteric process of the temporal modulation, some additional energy may be pumped into or extracted from the wave system Hayrapetyanab2013; Hayrapetyan2016; Hayrapetyan2017; Shlivinski2018; Hadad2019. Thus, in our system the energy balance reads

ΔSmod+Sinc(mn)propSmn=0\Delta S_{mod}+S_{inc}-\sum_{(mn)\in prop}S_{mn}=0 (46)

Nonetheless, since the modulation frequency is small compared to the signal frequency, this exceed power is expected to be relatively small, thus ΔSmodSinc\Delta S_{mod}\ll S_{inc}.

IV Nonreciprocal Anomalous Reflection with Near Complete Frequency Conversion

In this section we use the theory developed above in order to demonstrate one possible functionality of the time-modulated metagratings surface. We consider a space-time modulated metagratings structure with the following parameters: reference frequency frf_{r}, reference wavelength λr=c/fr\lambda_{r}=c/f_{r}, inter-wire distance a=0.6λra=0.6\lambda_{r}, wires distance from the PEC plate hh, wire loading capacitance C0=1C_{0}=1pF, loading periodicity Δ=0.1λr\Delta=0.1\lambda_{r}, and wire radius r0=0.5r_{0}=0.5mm. We introduce space-time modulation of the wires in the lattice such that ωm=0.1ωr\omega_{m}=0.1\omega_{r} (ωr=2πfr\omega_{r}=2\pi f_{r}) with modulation index m=0.1m=0.1, and super-cell size N=3N=3. A stationary metagratings structure, namely, in the absence of the space-time modulation, has been shown to be able to completely nullify the specular reflection Chalabi2017; Radi2017; Epstein2017; Rabinovich2018; Popov2018; Popov2019; Popov2019b; Epstein2018; Diaz-Rubio2017. Instead, the energy is directed to one of the grating lobes of the structure. This functionality has been recently termed - anomalous reflection. Nonetheless, up to now this effect has been demonstrated only in reciprocal structures, with the exception in Taravati2019 which explored a metagrating dielectric slab with a continuous space-time modulation of the refractive index. Due to reciprocity, if an impinging wave at θi\theta^{i} is fully reflected to θr\theta^{r}, then a wave arriving at θr-\theta^{r} will be reflected with the same efficiency to θi-\theta^{i}, where θi\theta^{i} and θr\theta^{r} are measured with respect to the yy axis, and considered positive when corresponding to waves with positive kxk_{x} component of the wave number. Here, we show that upon space-time modulation this effect can be turned to be strongly non-reciprocal, and moreover, we demonstrate that even with a small modulation index it is possible to achieve a near complete frequency conversion by the temporal modulation.

With the parameters listed above, in Fig. 2 we show the suppression of the specular reflection as a function of the incidence angle θi\theta^{i} and the distance between the lattice and the PEC plate hh.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Suppression of the specular reflection [in dB] as function of the incident wave angle θi\theta^{i} and the spacing hh between the wire-lattice and the PEC plate. This map is calculated for the parameters that are listed in the text, specifically, a/λ=0.6a/\lambda=0.6. In the map, the dark areas correspond to full specular reflection, whereas significant suppression of specular reflection is characterized by light colors. In these regions where specular reflection is prohibited, significant frequency conversion takes place into another space-time diffraction order as shown the Fig. 3 below.

The figure shows the specular reflection intensity, color-coded in logarithmic scale. For large range of parameters nearly full reflection takes place. However, at certain regions in the reflection intensity map inter-harmonic resonances take place leading to full suppression on the specular reflection. From the asymmetry in the figure, it is clear that this effect is non-reciprocal, leading to a very different power transmission for impinging waves that are coming from complementary direction, θi\theta^{i} or θi-\theta^{i}. Let us consider a specific example, with h=0.7775λrh=0.7775\lambda_{r} and incidence angle θi=30\theta^{i}=-30^{\circ}. With these parameters, using Eq. (III.4) it is clear that besides the specular reflection (fundamental harmonic (m,n)=(0,0)(m,n)=(0,0)), also the higher order (m,n)=(1,1)(m,n)=(1,-1) and (m,n)=(0,1)(m,n)=(0,1) harmonics are propagating. This means, that the incident wave power that is not specularly reflected has to efficiently couple to one or two of these additional propagating diffraction orders. This is demonstrated in Fig. 3 below. In the figure, the power flux density along the yy direction, SmnS_{mn}, is shown for the propagating harmonics. The specular reflection wave due to an incident wave at θi=30\theta^{i}=-30^{\circ} is shown in blue. At the desired reference frequency, specular reflection is completely suppressed. The incident wave energy experiences practically complete conversion to the (m,n)=(1,1)(m,n)=(1,-1) harmonic that propagates at frequency ω1=ωrωm\omega_{-1}=\omega_{r}-\omega_{m} which is reflected towards θ(1,1)42\theta_{(1,-1)}\approx 42^{\circ}. As opposed to that, the (m,n)=(0,1)(m,n)=(0,1) harmonic which is also propagating is very weakly excited. On the contrary, in the absence of inter-harmonic resonances as shown in Fig. 2, the wave that impinges at the complementary direction, i.e., at θi=30\theta^{i}=30^{\circ} experiences nearly complete specular reflection, and therefore, practically, no additional propagating harmonics will be excited.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Non-reciprocal scattering and high efficient frequency conversion. (a) With θi=30\theta^{i}=-30^{\circ}. In this case there is no specular reflection at ω=ωr\omega=\omega_{r} as shown by the continuous blue line. The dominant reflected wave corresponds to the (m,n)=(1,1)(m,n)=(1,-1) space time harmonics which propagates at angle θ1,1r42\theta^{r}_{1,-1}\approx 42^{\circ} and at frequency ω1=ωωm\omega_{-1}=\omega-\omega_{m}. Due to the parametric modulation some scattering to additional harmonics may take place but with very low efficiencies. For example, an additional propagating harmonics (m,n)=(0,1)(m,n)=(0,1) shown in yellow is practically not excited. An illustration of the overall response in this case is shown in (b). As opposed to that, with θi=30\theta^{i}=30^{\circ} practically regular specular reflection takes place as shown in (c), with θr=30\theta^{r}=30^{\circ}. In this case the metagrating surface practically behaves as a simple reflector, as illustrated in (d). Yet, additional scattering harmonics reduce the overall efficiency by some minor extent.

V Some Practical Considerations and Conclusions

A few words on practical realization of the proposed design. In the example considered above only N=3N=3 modulation regions are required per unit cell. The distance between the wires is large on the wavelength thus enabling a convenient wiring system. Furthermore, we note that all the capacitors that are distributed on each wire can be modulated simultaneously by modulation voltage that is applied at the two ends of each wire. Moreover, an additional simplification of the practical implementation may be achieved if each family of wires that are subject to the same modulation (namely, all the wires of the same color in Fig. 1) will be placed at a different height with respect to the ground plane. In that case, the modulation scheme may be designed using even a smaller number of modulation drivers. Note though that the analysis carried out in this paper should be slightly adjusted for this particular case.

To conclude, in this paper we have developed a theoretical model based on the discrete-dipole-approximation and polarizability theory for the scattering by a two-dimensional lattice of space-time modulated resonant capacitively loaded wires. Using this simple methodology we demonstrate the design of a significantly non-reciprocal anomalous reflection using metagrating structure with electrically large unit cells that contain a single wire each. Thus, significantly simplifying the practical requirements for the modulation system and hence opening a realistic possibility for actual fabrication of such devices. The non-reciprocal scattering process described here is also associated with efficient frequency conversion of the anomalous refracted beam. While the model explored in this paper involves capacitively loaded wires, the same approach may be also augmented to the optical frequency regime using fast modulation techniques Phare2015; Liu2011. And with possible implications in radio-frequency devices as well as for more efficient photovoltaic processes Green2012; Zhu2014. Moreover, we note that the model developed in this paper may be readily augmented to solve the excitation response due to a localized source by taking an approach akin to Hadad2011; Hadad2013_2.

Acknowledgements.
Y. Hadad would like to acknowledge support by the Alon Fellowship granted by the Israeli Council of Higher Education (2018-2021).

References

  • (1) S. Tanaka, N. Shimimura, and K. Ohtake, “Active circulators – The realization of circulators using transistors,” Proc. IEEE, 53, (3), pp. 260-267, (1965).
  • (2) Y. Ayasli, “Field effect transistor circulators,” IEEE Trans. Magn., 25, (5), pp. 3242-3247, (1989).
  • (3) K. Gallo and G. Assanto, “All-optical diode in a periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 79, (3), pp. 314-316, (2001).
  • (4) T. Kodera, D. L. Sounas, and C. Caloz, “Artificial Faraday rotation using a ring metamaterial structure without static magnetic field,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 99, pp. 03114, (2011).
  • (5) D. L. Sounas, T. Kodera, and C. Caloz, “Electromagnetic modeling of a magnetless nonreciprocal gyrotropic metasurface,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 61, (1), pp. 221-231, (2013).
  • (6) Z. Wang, et al., “Gyrotropic response in the absence of a bias field,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 109, (33), pp. 13194-13197, (2012).
  • (7) B.-I. Popa and S. A. Cummer, “Nonreciprocal active metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. B, 85, p. 205101, (2012).
  • (8) S. Manipatruni, J. T. Robinson, and M. Lipson, “Optical nonreciprocity in optomechanical structures,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 102, 213903, (2009).
  • (9) Y Mazor, A Alú, “Nonreciprocal hyperbolic propagation over moving metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. B 99 (4), 045407 (2019)
  • (10) R. Fleury, D. L. Sounas, C. F. Sieck, M. R. Haberman, and A. Alú, “Sound isolation and giant linear nonreciprocity in a compact acoustic circulator,” Science, 343, pp. 516-519, (2014).
  • (11) S. Qin, Q. Xu, and Y. E. Wang, “Nonreciprocal components with distributedly modulated capacitors,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., 62, (10), pp. 2260-2272, (2014).
  • (12) N. Reiskarimian and H. Krishnaswamy, “Magnetic-free non-reciprocity based on staggered commutation,” Nat. Commun., 7, p. 11217, (2016).
  • (13) Z. Yu and S. Fan, “Complete optical isolation created by indirect interband photonic transitions,” Nature Photon., 3, pp. 91-94, (2009).
  • (14) H. Lira, Z. Yu, S. Fan, and M. Lipson, “Electrically driven nonreciprocity induced by interband photonic transition on a silicon chip,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, 033901, (2012).
  • (15) S. Qin and Y. E. Wang, “Broadband parametric circulator with balanced monolithic integrated distributedly modulated capacitors (DMC),” in IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Dig., San Francisco, CA, USA, May 2016, pp. 1-3.
  • (16) D. L. Sounas, C. Caloz, and A. Alú, “Giant non-reciprocity at the subwavelength scale using angular momentum-biased metamaterials,” Nat. Commun., 4, p. 2407, (2013).
  • (17) N. A. Estep, D. L. Sounas, J. Soric, and A. Alú, “Magnetic-free non-reciprocity and isolation based on parametrically modulated coupled-resonator loops,” Nature Phys., 10, pp. 923-927, (2014).
  • (18) Y Mazor, A Alú, “One-Way Hyperbolic Metasurfaces Based on Synthetic Motion,” arXiv:1902.02653 (2019)
  • (19) Y. Hadad, D. Sounas, and A. Alú, “Space-time gradient metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. B, 92, p. 100304(R), (2015).
  • (20) Y. Hadad, J. C. Soric, and A. Alú, “Breaking temporal symmetries for emission and absorption,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 10, pp. 3471-3475, (2016).
  • (21) S. Taravati, N. Chamanara, and C. Caloz, “Nonreciprocal electromagnetic scattering from a periodically space-time modulated slab and application to a quasisonic isolator,” Phys. Rev. B, 96, (16), (2017).
  • (22) S. Taravati and C. Caloz, “Mixer-Duplexer-Antenna Leaky-Wave System Based on Periodic Space-Time Modulation,” IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop., 65, (2), pp. 442-452, (2017).
  • (23) H. Chalabi, Y. Ra’di, D. L. Sounas, and A. Alú, “Efficient anomalous reflection through near-field interactions in metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. B, 96, 075432, (2017).
  • (24) Y. Radi, D. L. Sounas, A. Alu, “Metagratings: beyond the limits of graded metasurfaces for wave front control,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, (6), 067404, (2017).
  • (25) A. Epstein, O. Rabinovich, “Unveiling the properties of metagratings via a detailed analytical model for synthesis and analysis,” Phys. Rev. Appl., 8, (5), 054037, (2017).
  • (26) O. Rabinovich, A. Epstein, “Analytical Design of Printed-Circuit-Board (PCB) Metagratings for Perfect Anomalous Reflection,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 66, (8), pp. 4086-4095, (2018).
  • (27) V. Popov, F. Boust, and S. N. Burokur, “Controlling Diffraction Patterns with Metagratings,” Phys. Rev. Applied 10, 011002 (2018).
  • (28) V. Popov, F. Boust, and S. N. Burokur, “Constructing the Near field and Far field with Reactive Metagratings: Study on the Degrees of Freedom,” Phys. Rev. Applied 11, 024074 (2019).
  • (29) V. Popov, F. Boust, S. N. Burokur, “Beamforming with metagratings at microwave frequencies: design procedure and experimental demonstration,” arXiv:1904.13294 (2019).
  • (30) A. Epstein, O. Rabinovich, “Perfect Anomalous Refraction with Metagratings,” arXiv:1804.02362, (2018).
  • (31) A. Diaz-Rubio, V. S. Asadchy, A. Elsakka, and S. A. Tretyakov, “From the generalized reflection law to the realization of perfect anomalous reflectors”, Science Advances, 3, e1602714, (2017).
  • (32) S. Taravati, G. V. Eleftheriades, “Generalized Space-Time Periodic Diffraction Gratings: Theory and Applications,” arXiv:1902.09885 (2019).
  • (33) N. Yu, et al., “Light propagation with phase discontinuities: Generalized laws of reflection and refraction,” Science, 334, pp. 333-337, (2011).
  • (34) F. Monticone, N. M. Estakhri, and A. Alú, “Full control of nanoscale optical transmission with a composite metascreen,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 203903, (2013).
  • (35) Y. Li, et al., “Experimental realization of full control of reflected wave with subwavelength acoustic metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. Appl., 2, 064002, (2014).
  • (36) C. Pfeiffer and A. Grbic, “Millimeter-wave transmitarrays for wavefront and polarization control,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 61, pp. 4407-4417, (2013).
  • (37) M. Selvanayagam and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Circuit modelling of Huygens surfaces,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 12, pp. 1642-1645, (2013).
  • (38) M. Selvanayagam and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Discontinuous electromagnetic fields using orthogonal electric and magnetic currents for wavefront manipulation,” Opt. Express, 21, pp. 14409-14429, (2013).
  • (39) C. Pfeiffer and A. Grbic, “Metamaterial Huygens’ surfaces: tayloring wave fronts with reflectionless sheets,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 197401, (2013).
  • (40) D. Sievenpiper, J. Schaffiner, R. Loo, G. Tangonan, S. Ontiveros, and R. Harold, “A tunable impedance surface performing as a reconfigurable beam steering reflector,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 50, pp. 384-390, (2002).
  • (41) E. Hasman, V. Kleoner, G. Biener, and A. Niv, “Polarization dependent focusing lens by use of quantized Pancharatnam – Berry phase diffractive optics,” App. Phys. Lett., 82, p. 328, (2003).
  • (42) D. Lin, P. Fan, E. Hasman, and M. L. Brongersma, “Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements,” Science, 345, pp. 298-302, (2014).
  • (43) J. P. S. Wong, M. Selvanayagam, and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Design of unit cells and demonstration of methods for synthesizing Huygens metasurfaces,” Photonics and Nanostructures: Fundam. Appl., 12, pp. 360-375, (2014).
  • (44) M. Kim, A. M. H. Wong, and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Optical Huygens’ metasurfaces with independent control of the magnitude and phase of the local reflection coefficients,” Phys. Rev. X, 4, 041042, (2014).
  • (45) A. Epstein, G. V. Eleftheriades, “Huygens’ metasurfaces via the equivalence principle: design and applications,” Journal of Opt. Soc. Am. B, 33, (2), pp. A31-A50, 2016.
  • (46) A. Epstein, G. V. Eleftheriades, “Passive Lossless Huygens Metasurfaces for Conversion of Arbitrary Source Field to Directive Radiation,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 62, (11), pp. 5680 – 5695, (2014).
  • (47) A. Epstein, J. P. S Wong, G. V. Eleftheriades, “Cavity-excited Huygens’ metasurface antennas for near-unity aperture illumination efficiency from arbitrarily large apertures”, Nature Commun., 7, p. 10360, (2016).
  • (48) A. H. Dorrah, M. Chen, G. V. Eleftheriades, “Bianisotropic Huygens’ Metasurface for Wideband Impedance Matching Between Two Dielectric Media,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 66, (9), pp. 4729-4742, (2018).
  • (49) D. L. Sounas, N. M. Estakhri, and A. Alú, “Metasurfaces with engineered reflection and transmission: Optimal designs through coupled-mode analysis,” in 10th International Congress on Advanced Electromagnetic Materials in Microwaves and Optics - Metamaterials 2016, Crete, Greece, Sep. 2016.
  • (50) B. T. Draine and P. J. Flatau, “Discrete-dipole approximation for scattering calculations,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11 (4) pp. 1491-1499 (1994)
  • (51) S. Tretyakov, Analytical Modelling in Applied Electromagnetics, Artech House, 2003.
  • (52) Y. Hadad, B. Z. Steinberg, “Quasistatic resonance of a chemical potential interruption in a graphene layer and its polarizability: The mixed-polarity semilocalized plasmon,” Phys. Rev. B 88 (7), 075439 (2013).
  • (53) Y. Hadad, B. Z. Steinberg, “Magnetized spiral chains of plasmonic ellipsoids for one-way optical waveguides,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (23), 233904 (2010).
  • (54) Y. Mazor, B. Z. Steinberg, “Longitudinal chirality, enhanced nonreciprocity, and nanoscale planar one-way plasmonic guiding,” Phys. Rev. B 86 (4), 045120 (2012).
  • (55) Y. Mazor, Y. Hadad, B. Z. Steinberg, “Planar one-way guiding in periodic particle arrays with asymmetric unit cell and general group-symmetry considerations,” Phys. Rev. B 92 (12), 125129 (2015).
  • (56) In the pollowing we apply the proposed approach on infinite wires excited by electromagnetic wave polarized along the wire axis. While the theory remains essentially the same, in this context a better term would be susceptability rather than polarizability.
  • (57) A. G. Hayrapetyanab, K. K. Grigoryanc, R. G. Petrosyanc, and S.Fritzschede, “Propagation of sound waves through a spatially homogeneous but smoothly time-dependent medium,” Annals of Physics, 333, pp. 47-65 (2013).
  • (58) A. G. Hayrapetyan, J. B. Gotte, K. K. Grigoryan, S. Fritzsche, and R. G. Petrosyan, “Electromagnetic wave propagation in spatially homogeneous yet smoothly time-varying dielectric media,” Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 178, pp. 158-166 (2016).
  • (59) A. G. Hayrapetyan, S. P. Klevansky, and J. B. Gotte, “Instantaneous modulations in time-varying complex optical potentials,” New J. Phys., 19, 105002 (2017).
  • (60) A. Shlivinski and Y. Hadad, “Beyond the Bode-Fano Bound: Wideband Impedance Matching for Short Pulses Using Temporal Switching of Transmission-Line Parameters,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (20), 204301 (2018).
  • (61) Y. Hadad, A. Shlivinski, “Soft Temporal Switching of TL Parameters: Wave-field, Energy Balance, Applications,” arXiv:1905.02377 (2019).
  • (62) M. Liu, X. Yin, E. Ulin-Avila, B. Geng, T. Zentgraf, L. Ju, F. Wang, and X. Zhang, “A graphene-based broadband optical modulator,” Nature, 474, pp. 64-67, (2011).
  • (63) C. T. Phare, Y.-H. D. Lee, J. Cardenas, and M. Lipson, “Graphene electro-optic modulator with 30 GHz bandwidth,” Nat. Photon., 9, pp. 511-514, (2015).
  • (64) M. A. Green, “Time-asymmetric photovoltaics,” Nano Lett., 12, pp. 5985-5988, (2012).
  • (65) L. Zhu and S. Fan, “Near-complete violation of detailed balance in thermal radiation,” Phys. Rev. B, 90, 220301, (2014).
  • (66) Y. Hadad, B. Z. Steinberg, “Green’s function theory for infinite and semi-infinite particle chains,” Phys. Rev. B 84 (12), 125402 (2011)
  • (67) Y. Hadad, Y. Mazor, B. Z. Steinberg, “Green’s function theory for one-way particle chains,” Phys. Rev. B 87 (3), 035130 (2013).