[#43077] problems committing — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
It seems like the disk might be full on the svn server:
5 messages
2012/03/05
[#43090] "\\".gsub("\\", "\\\\") == "\\" ?!!! — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
Please, help me understand what is happening here.
6 messages
2012/03/06
[#43094] Re: "\\".gsub("\\", "\\\\") == "\\" ?!!!
— Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
2012/03/06
A literal passed as second argument to gsub goes over two
[#43120] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6124][Open] What is the purpose of "fake" gems in Ruby — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
27 messages
2012/03/07
[#43142] Questions about thread performance (with benchmark included) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
A while ago I've written an article entitled "How Nokogiri and JRuby
10 messages
2012/03/08
[#43785] Re: Questions about thread performance (with benchmark included)
— Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
2012/03/28
Hello, Rodrigo.
[#43797] Re: Questions about thread performance (with benchmark included)
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2012/03/28
Em 27-03-2012 23:22, Tomoyuki Chikanaga escreveu:
[#44213] Re: Questions about thread performance (with benchmark included)
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/04/09
Hi,
[#44214] Re: Questions about thread performance (with benchmark included)
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2012/04/09
#### MRI threads myths and facts #####
[#44220] Re: Questions about thread performance (with benchmark included)
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2012/04/09
Hi Urabe, thank you for your input, but I think you have
[#43163] Help w/ some C to create NullClass — trans <transfire@...>
I am trying to write a C extension for "NullClass" functionality. I've
3 messages
2012/03/10
[#43245] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6131][Open] Ctrl-C handler do not work from exec process (Windows) — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
10 messages
2012/03/12
[#43279] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6148][Open] ruby_1_9_3 revision conflict — Jon Forums <redmine@...>
4 messages
2012/03/14
[#43313] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6150][Open] add Enumerable#grep_v — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>
17 messages
2012/03/15
[#43325] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6154][Open] Eliminate extending WaitReadable/Writable at runtime — Charles Nutter <headius@...>
25 messages
2012/03/16
[#43369] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #6154][Open] Eliminate extending WaitReadable/Writable at runtime
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2012/03/17
2012/3/16 Charles Nutter <[email protected]>:
[#43326] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6154] Eliminate extending WaitReadable/Writable at runtime
— Charles Nutter <headius@...>
2012/03/16
[#43334] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6155][Open] Enumerable::Lazy#flat_map raises an exception when an element does not respond to #each — Dan Kubb <dan.kubb@...>
9 messages
2012/03/16
[#43345] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6159][Open] Enumerable::Lazy#inspect — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
10 messages
2012/03/16
[#43497] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6179][Open] File::pos broken in Windows 1.9.3p125 — "jmthomas (Jason Thomas)" <jmthomas@...>
24 messages
2012/03/20
[#43502] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6180][Open] to_b for converting objects to a boolean value — "AaronLasseigne (Aaron Lasseigne)" <aaron.lasseigne@...>
17 messages
2012/03/20
[#43529] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6183][Open] Enumerator::Lazy performance issue — "gregolsen (Innokenty Mikhailov)" <anotheroneman@...>
36 messages
2012/03/21
[#43814] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6219][Open] Return value of Hash#store — "MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet)" <Martin.Bosslet@...>
20 messages
2012/03/28
[#43904] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6225][Open] Hash#+ — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
36 messages
2012/03/29
[#43923] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6225] Hash#+
— "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>
2012/03/30
[#43909] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6225][Assigned] Hash#+
— "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
2012/03/29
[#43920] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6225] Hash#+
— "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>
2012/03/30
[#43951] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6228][Open] [mingw] Errno::EBADF in ruby/test_io.rb on ruby_1_9_3 — "jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@...>
28 messages
2012/03/30
[#43996] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6236][Open] WEBrick::HTTPServer swallows Exception — "regularfry (Alex Young)" <alex@...>
13 messages
2012/03/31
[#44015] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #6239][Open] super Does Not Pass Modified Rest Args When Originally Empty — "mudge (Paul Mucur)" <mudge@...>
6 messages
2012/03/31
[ruby-core:43689] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4057][Rejected] FileUtils.copy with FIFOs and Special Devices
From:
"mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
Date:
2012-03-26 15:30:39 UTC
List:
ruby-core #43689
Issue #4057 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
Status changed from Assigned to Rejected
Hello,
Runpaint, I think you meant FileUtils.copy_entry.
$ mkfifo fifo
$ ruby -rfileutils -e 'FileUtils.copy_entry("fifo", "lifo")'
...:in `copy': cannot handle FIFO (RuntimeError)
> So,
> presumably, either these checks should be removed from FileUtils such that
> it raises an exception when a special device is encountered, or we should
> replace them with calls to the `mknod`/`mkfifo` commands.
I object to replacing it.
Matz said "mknod and mkfifo are not ubiquitous". The same is true
for the commands.
I also object to removing the check.
I don't think there are any actual problems in the current behavior.
Though I don't recommend strongly, a user can change the behavior by
just defining File.mkfifo method.
Removing the check brings disadvantage but no advantage, I think.
So, I close this ticket as Rejected.
If you know any actual problem about the current behavior, please
reopen this ticket.
Thanks,
--
Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]>
----------------------------------------
Feature #4057: FileUtils.copy with FIFOs and Special Devices
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4057#change-25185
Author: runpaint (Run Paint Run Run)
Status: Rejected
Priority: Low
Assignee: mame (Yusuke Endoh)
Category: lib
Target version:
=begin
In http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/repositories/diff/ruby-19?rev=6747 support for copying FIFOs and special devices was added to FileUtils.copy, and the same code exists in trunk. It relies on the existence of File.mknod and File.mkfifo. According to git's "pickaxe", those methods have never existed. Various patches to add this functionality have been sent to ruby-core, but in http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/144168 matz rejected the idea. So, presumably, either these checks should be removed from FileUtils such that it raises an exception when a special device is encountered, or we should replace them with calls to the `mknod`/`mkfifo` commands. For me, the following just hangs:
run@paint:~$ mkfifo fifo
run@paint:~$ ruby -rfileutils -e 'FileUtils.copy("fifo", "lifo")'
=end
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/