[#48729] [ANN] ruby 2.0.0-preview1 released — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
Japanese later; 日本語はあとで
10 messages
2012/11/02
[#48977] Re: [ANN] ruby 2.0.0-preview1 released
— V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2012/11/06
Hi,
[#48979] Re: [ANN] ruby 2.0.0-preview1 released
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2012/11/06
Hello Vit,
[#48982] Re: [ANN] ruby 2.0.0-preview1 released
— V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2012/11/06
2012/11/6 Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]>
[#48745] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7267][Open] Dir.glob on Mac OS X returns unexpected string encodings for unicode file names — "kennygrant (Kenny Grant)" <kennygrant@...>
17 messages
2012/11/02
[#48773] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7269][Open] Refinement doesn't work if using locate after method — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
12 messages
2012/11/03
[#48806] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7269] Refinement doesn't work if using locate after method
— "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
2012/11/03
[#48808] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7269] Refinement doesn't work if using locate after method
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/11/03
(2012/11/03 10:11), headius (Charles Nutter) wrote:
[#48810] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7269] Refinement doesn't work if using locate after method
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/11/03
(2012/11/03 10:36), SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#48774] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "shugo (Shugo Maeda)" <redmine@...>
3 messages
2012/11/03
[#48819] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
5 messages
2012/11/03
[#48820] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7271][Assigned] Refinement doesn't seem lexical — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
5 messages
2012/11/03
[#48847] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7274][Open] UnboundMethods should be bindable to any object that is_a?(owner of the UnboundMethod) — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>
21 messages
2012/11/04
[#48882] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
3 messages
2012/11/05
[#48964] [Backport93 - Backport #7285][Assigned] some failures on RubyInstaller CI — "usa (Usaku NAKAMURA)" <usa@...>
5 messages
2012/11/06
[#48988] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7292][Open] Enumerable#to_h — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
40 messages
2012/11/06
[#48997] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7297][Open] map_to alias for each_with_object — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
19 messages
2012/11/06
[#49018] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7299][Open] Ruby should not completely ignore blocks. — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
13 messages
2012/11/07
[#49068] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7299] Ruby should not completely ignore blocks.
— "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...>
2012/11/07
[#49078] Re: [ruby-cvs:44714] marcandre:r37544 (ruby_1_9_3): merge revisions r33453, r37542: — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello,
4 messages
2012/11/08
[#49119] ID_ALLOCATOR ? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello.
10 messages
2012/11/08
[#49173] Re: ID_ALLOCATOR ?
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/11/09
Can I see ruby-prof code?
[#49174] Re: ID_ALLOCATOR ?
— Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
2012/11/09
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:14 AM, SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#49196] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7322][Open] Add a new operator name #>< for bit-wise "exclusive or" — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
18 messages
2012/11/10
[#49211] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7328][Open] Move ** operator precedence under unary + and - — "boris_stitnicky (Boris Stitnicky)" <boris@...>
20 messages
2012/11/11
[#49256] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7336][Open] Flexiable OPerator Precedence — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
18 messages
2012/11/12
[#49267] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7340][Open] 'each_with' or 'into' alias for 'each_with_object' — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
8 messages
2012/11/12
[#49268] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7341][Open] Enumerable#associate — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
8 messages
2012/11/12
[#49282] Re: [ruby-cvs:44801] tenderlove:r37631 (trunk): * probes.d: add DTrace probe declarations. — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello,
5 messages
2012/11/13
[#49284] Re: [ruby-cvs:44801] tenderlove:r37631 (trunk): * probes.d: add DTrace probe declarations.
— "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
2012/11/13
Hello,
[#49292] Re: [ruby-cvs:44801] tenderlove:r37631 (trunk): * probes.d: add DTrace probe declarations.
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2012/11/13
2012/11/13 U.Nakamura <[email protected]>:
[#49298] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7346][Open] object(...) as syntax sugar for object.call(...) — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
7 messages
2012/11/13
[#49320] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
3 messages
2012/11/13
[#49328] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7349][Open] Struct#inspect needs more meaningful output — "postmodern (Hal Brodigan)" <postmodern.mod3@...>
6 messages
2012/11/14
[#49340] bugs.ruby-lang.org - 500 error — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
6 messages
2012/11/14
[#49341] Re: bugs.ruby-lang.org - 500 error
— Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
2012/11/14
I've been unable to access it since morning EET (about 6 hours now).
[#49342] Re: bugs.ruby-lang.org - 500 error
— Zachary Scott <zachary@...>
2012/11/14
It's almost 3am in Japan now, don't forget.
[#49343] Re: bugs.ruby-lang.org - 500 error
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2012/11/14
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Zachary Scott <[email protected]> w=
[#49354] review open pull requests on github — Zachary Scott <zachary@...>
Could we get a review on any open pull requests on github before the
12 messages
2012/11/15
[#49355] Re: review open pull requests on github
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2012/11/15
2012/11/15 Zachary Scott <[email protected]>:
[#49356] Re: review open pull requests on github
— Zachary Scott <zachary@...>
2012/11/15
Ok, I was hoping one of the maintainers might want to.
[#49382] Re: review open pull requests on github
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
2012/11/15
I could add my eyes to monitor the github issues/pull requests, if only to
[#49387] Re: review open pull requests on github
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2012/11/15
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Marc-Andre Lafortune
[#49388] Re: review open pull requests on github
— Zachary Scott <zachary@...>
2012/11/15
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote:
[#49391] Re: review open pull requests on github
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
2012/11/15
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Zachary Scott <[email protected]>
[#49416] make check: missing psych — Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...>
Hi,
7 messages
2012/11/16
[#49418] Re: make check: missing psych
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2012/11/16
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
[#49419] Re: make check: missing psych
— Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...>
2012/11/16
Luis Lavena wrote:
[#49463] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7375][Open] embedding libyaml in psych for Ruby 2.0 — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
21 messages
2012/11/16
[#49494] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7375] embedding libyaml in psych for Ruby 2.0
— "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <v.ondruch@...>
2012/11/17
[#49497] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7375] embedding libyaml in psych for Ruby 2.0
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2012/11/17
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 03:05:50AM +0900, vo.x (Vit Ondruch) wrote:
[#49499] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7375] embedding libyaml in psych for Ruby 2.0
— V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2012/11/17
Dne 17.11.2012 21:19, Aaron Patterson napsal(a):
[#49500] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7375] embedding libyaml in psych for Ruby 2.0
— Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
2012/11/17
On 17 November 2012 21:34, V=EDt Ondruch <[email protected]> wrote:
[#49524] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7375] embedding libyaml in psych for Ruby 2.0
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2012/11/18
Hello,
[#49468] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7378][Open] Adding Pathname#write — "aef (Alexander E. Fischer)" <aef@...>
6 messages
2012/11/17
[#49479] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7379][Open] Unexpected result of Kernel#gets on Windows 8 — "phasis68 (Heesob Park)" <phasis@...>
6 messages
2012/11/17
[#49518] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7383][Open] Use stricter cache check in load.c — "funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)" <funny.falcon@...>
4 messages
2012/11/18
[#49536] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7388][Open] Object#embed — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
7 messages
2012/11/18
[#49543] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7390][Open] Funny Falcon Threads — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
4 messages
2012/11/18
[#49558] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7395][Open] Negative numbers can't be primes by definition — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
10 messages
2012/11/19
[#49868] How to stop spam from ruby-core — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2012/11/22
[#49949] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7426][Assigned] Update Rdoc — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
10 messages
2012/11/24
[#50198] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7426] Update Rdoc
— "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <[email protected]>
2012/11/27
[#50202] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7426] Update Rdoc
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/11/27
(2012/11/27 13:33), drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote:
[#50203] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7426] Update Rdoc
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2012/11/27
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:57 AM, SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#50204] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7426] Update Rdoc
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2012/11/27
On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:09 PM, Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote:
[#50092] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7434][Open] Allow caller_locations and backtrace_locations to receive negative params — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
21 messages
2012/11/25
[#50264] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7457][Open] GC.stat to return "allocated object count" and "freed object count" — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
5 messages
2012/11/28
[#50306] Towards a better process for changing Ruby — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
Hey folks,
11 messages
2012/11/29
[#50317] Re: Towards a better process for changing Ruby
— Yorick Peterse <yorickpeterse@...>
2012/11/29
What I'd like to see is primarily better communication and release
[#50320] Re: Towards a better process for changing Ruby
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2012/11/29
Hello Magnus,
[#50750] Re: Towards a better process for changing Ruby
— Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
2012/12/11
Endoh-san,
[#50312] How to stop spam message from redmine.ruby-lang.org — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
HI,
7 messages
2012/11/29
[#50315] Re: How to stop spam message from redmine.ruby-lang.org
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2012/11/29
Hi,
[#50372] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7476][Open] missing "IP_TRANSPARENT" constant for IP sockets. — "elico (Eliezer Croitoru)" <eliezer@...>
8 messages
2012/11/30
[#52809] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7476] missing "IP_TRANSPARENT" constant for IP sockets.
— "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
2013/02/24
[#53889] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7476] missing "IP_TRANSPARENT" constant for IP sockets.
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/04/02
2013/2/24 ko1 (Koichi Sasada) <[email protected]>:
[ruby-core:48987] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7291] split gives core dump on large file
From:
"sorah (Shota Fukumori)" <sorah@...>
Date:
2012-11-06 16:49:01 UTC
List:
ruby-core #48987
Issue #7291 has been updated by sorah (Shota Fukumori).
"ruby -v" wrote on this ticket: ruby 1.9.3p194 (2012-04-20 revision 35410) [x86_64-linux]
but in your crash log: ruby 1.9.2p180 (2011-02-18 revision 30909) [x86_64-linux]
which one is right?
----------------------------------------
Bug #7291: split gives core dump on large file
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7291#change-32506
Author: niels_tolstrup (Niels Tolstrup)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category: core
Target version:
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3p194 (2012-04-20 revision 35410) [x86_64-linux]
When applying split on a large file, we get a segmentation fault.
We have tried on ubuntu 12.04LTS with ruby 1.9.2p180 and ruby 1.9.3p194.
The bug can be reproduced with this code:
data = ">ENSG00000010072|ENST00000008440|1|1|231474002|231488267|SprT-like N-terminal domain [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:25356]
GACGGGCCGTCTCGAGAGCCGGCATCTCCTAGGAGCTAGTCCTGGTCCTCGGCTAGGCGG
CTTGGGGTCGCGGCGTAACTGGGGAGCCAGCCTGACGCCGGCGGACCCCGCCTGTGATCC
TGGCAACGATGGATGATGACTTGATGTTGGCACTGCGGCTTCAGGAGGAGTGGAACTTGC
AGGAGGCGGAGCGCGATCATGCCCAGGAGTCCCTGTCGCTAGTGGACGCGTCGTGGGAGT
TGGTGGACCCCACACCGGACTTGCAGGCACTGTTTGTTCAGTTTAACGACCAATTCTTCT
GGGGCCAGCTGGAGGCCGTCGAGGTGAAGTGGAGCGTGCGAATGACCCTGTGAGTTCCGA
GCCCCGCTGGGGAAAGAGGCGGGACTGGCAGCTTTCCTGCAGCCCCCGGCCCTGGTTTTC
TCTCCTTTCTCTAGTCCGACGGTCCCAGGGGGCGTTAAATGAGGGGAGTCTGGTTTTGGA
CCTGGCAATTCCTGCCTCGGCGTGTTTCTGTCTTCCTTACCTTTTCTCCCACTCGAACAA"
fh = File.open('test.txt','w')
(1..15000000).each {|i| fh.puts(data)}
fh.close
str = File.read("test.txt")
str.split(/>ENS/).each do |match|
if match.split(">ENS").length > 1
puts match
exit
end
end
We get this error:
segfault.rb:22: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.2p180 (2011-02-18 revision 30909) [x86_64-linux]
-- control frame ----------
c:0007 p:---- s:0021 b:0021 l:000020 d:000020 CFUNC :split
c:0006 p:0013 s:0017 b:0017 l:0012d8 d:000016 BLOCK segfault.rb:22
c:0005 p:---- s:0014 b:0014 l:000013 d:000013 FINISH
c:0004 p:---- s:0012 b:0012 l:000011 d:000011 CFUNC :each
c:0003 p:0093 s:0009 b:0009 l:0012d8 d:0002c0 EVAL segfault.rb:20
c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH
c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:0012d8 d:0012d8 TOP
---------------------------
-- Ruby level backtrace information ----------------------------------------
segfault.rb:20:in `<main>'
segfault.rb:20:in `each'
segfault.rb:22:in `block in <main>'
segfault.rb:22:in `split'
-- C level backtrace information -------------------------------------------
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(rb_vm_bugreport+0x61) [0x7ffa89323101]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(+0x5f24e) [0x7ffa8920d24e]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(rb_bug+0xa5) [0x7ffa8920e075]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(+0x10b874) [0x7ffa892b9874]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x364c0) [0x7ffa88e254c0]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(rb_memsearch+0x68) [0x7ffa89295758]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(+0x1298f5) [0x7ffa892d78f5]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(+0x16e5a6) [0x7ffa8931c5a6]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(+0x164978) [0x7ffa89312978]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(+0x16a80b) [0x7ffa8931880b]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(rb_yield+0x47) [0x7ffa8931dcf7]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(rb_ary_each+0x46) [0x7ffa891def16]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(+0x16e5a6) [0x7ffa8931c5a6]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(+0x164978) [0x7ffa89312978]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(+0x16a80b) [0x7ffa8931880b]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(rb_iseq_eval_main+0xb1) [0x7ffa8931e631]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(+0x65292) [0x7ffa89213292]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(ruby_exec_node+0x1d) [0x7ffa8921414d]
/usr/share/ruby-rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/libruby.so.1.9(ruby_run_node+0x1e) [0x7ffa8921640e]
ruby(main+0x4b) [0x40082b]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xed) [0x7ffa88e1076d]
ruby() [0x400859]
[NOTE]
You may have encountered a bug in the Ruby interpreter or extension libraries.
Bug reports are welcome.
For details: http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html
Aborted (core dumped)
best regards
Niels and Jesper
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/