[#59462] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9342][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#clear does not notify waiting threads in Ruby 1.9.3 — "jsc (Justin Collins)" <redmine@...>

9 messages 2014/01/02

[#59466] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9343][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#max= wakes up waiters properly — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2014/01/02

[#59498] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9352][Open] [BUG] rb_sys_fail_str(connect(2) for [fe80::1%lo0]:3000) - errno == 0 — "kain (Claudio Poli)" <claudio@...>

10 messages 2014/01/03

[#59516] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9356][Open] TCPSocket.new does not seem to handle INTR — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>

48 messages 2014/01/03

[#59538] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>

33 messages 2014/01/03
[#59541] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2014/01/04

Hi, I noticed a trivial typo in array.c, and it fails building struct.c

[#59582] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2014/01/06

Intersting challenge.

[#59583] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9367][Open] REXML::XmlDecl doesn't use user specified quotes — "bearmini (Takashi Oguma)" <bear.mini@...>

12 messages 2014/01/06

[#59642] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9384][Open] Segfault in ruby 2.1.0p0 — "cbliard (Christophe Bliard)" <christophe.bliard@...>

11 messages 2014/01/08

[#59791] About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

A while ago I created a proof-of-concept that I intended to use in my

16 messages 2014/01/15
[#59794] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2014/01/15

On 15 Jan 2014, at 11:58, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =

[#59808] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2014/01/16

Em 15-01-2014 19:42, Eric Hodel escreveu:

[#59810] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2014/01/16

On 16 Jan 2014, at 02:15, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =

[#59826] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2014/01/17

Em 16-01-2014 19:43, Eric Hodel escreveu:

[#59832] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2014/01/17

On 17 Jan 2014, at 04:22, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =

[ruby-core:59495] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9347][Open] Accept non callable argument to detect

From: "Fuad Saud" <fuadksd@...>
Date: 2014-01-03 04:21:39 UTC
List: ruby-core #59495
I think, if it was possible, a call like this `ary.detect(:sym)` would make=
 more sense by using case equality for comparison instead of #call. It =
would be useful with regexes for example. There's a ticket proposing this =
but I can't seem to find it.=E2=80=94
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:38 PM, marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Issue #9347 has been reported by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune).
> ----------------------------------------
> Feature #9347: Accept non callable argument to detect
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9347
> Author: marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)
> Status: Open
> Priority: Normal
> Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
> Category: core
> Target version: current: 2.2.0
> Currently, the only argument that `Enumerable#detect` accepts is a =
callable object.
> Shouldn't we accept non callable objects too=3F
>     [42].detect(:not=5Ffound){} # =3D> NoMethodError: undefined method =
`call' for :not=5Ffound:Symbol
>      # would return :not=5Ffound instead.
> I'd suggest that if the given argument does not `respond=5Fto=3F :call`, =
then it would be returned as is instead of raising an error as currently.
> Wouldn't this be more flexible and possibly more performant=3F
> Inspired by http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20883414/why-does-enumerab=
ledetect-need-a-proc-lambda
> --=20
> http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread