[#59462] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9342][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#clear does not notify waiting threads in Ruby 1.9.3 — "jsc (Justin Collins)" <redmine@...>

9 messages 2014/01/02

[#59466] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9343][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#max= wakes up waiters properly — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2014/01/02

[#59498] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9352][Open] [BUG] rb_sys_fail_str(connect(2) for [fe80::1%lo0]:3000) - errno == 0 — "kain (Claudio Poli)" <claudio@...>

10 messages 2014/01/03

[#59516] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9356][Open] TCPSocket.new does not seem to handle INTR — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>

48 messages 2014/01/03

[#59538] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>

33 messages 2014/01/03
[#59541] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2014/01/04

Hi, I noticed a trivial typo in array.c, and it fails building struct.c

[#59582] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2014/01/06

Intersting challenge.

[#59583] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9367][Open] REXML::XmlDecl doesn't use user specified quotes — "bearmini (Takashi Oguma)" <bear.mini@...>

12 messages 2014/01/06

[#59642] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9384][Open] Segfault in ruby 2.1.0p0 — "cbliard (Christophe Bliard)" <christophe.bliard@...>

11 messages 2014/01/08

[#59791] About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

A while ago I created a proof-of-concept that I intended to use in my

16 messages 2014/01/15
[#59794] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2014/01/15

On 15 Jan 2014, at 11:58, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =

[#59808] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2014/01/16

Em 15-01-2014 19:42, Eric Hodel escreveu:

[#59810] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2014/01/16

On 16 Jan 2014, at 02:15, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =

[#59826] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2014/01/17

Em 16-01-2014 19:43, Eric Hodel escreveu:

[#59832] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2014/01/17

On 17 Jan 2014, at 04:22, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =

[ruby-core:59541] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed

From: Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date: 2014-01-04 00:10:50 UTC
List: ruby-core #59541
Hi, I noticed a trivial typo in array.c, and it fails building struct.c
and array.c on 32-bit x86 (with 64-byte cache line).

--- a/array.c
+++ b/array.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ VALUE rb_cArray;
 
 static ID id_cmp, id_div, id_power;
 
-STATIC_ASSERT(rbarray_embed_len_max, RARRAY_EMBED_LEN_MAX <= (RARRAY_EMBED_LEN_MASK >>_ RSTRUCT_EMBED_LEN_SHIFT));
+STATIC_ASSERT(rbarray_embed_len_max, RARRAY_EMBED_LEN_MAX <= (RARRAY_EMBED_LEN_MASK >> RARRAY_EMBED_LEN_SHIFT));
 
 #define ARY_DEFAULT_SIZE 16
 #define ARY_MAX_SIZE (LONG_MAX / (int)sizeof(VALUE))

--------
3 bits for embedded array/struct length does not seem to be enough :<

gcc version 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-5) 
compiling struct.c
compiling version.c
array.c:31:1: error: size of array ‘static_assert_rbarray_embed_len_max_check’ is negative
struct.c:15:1: error: size of array ‘static_assert_rbstruct_embed_len_max_check’ is negative

In This Thread