[#61822] Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014 — Zachary Scott <e@...>
I would like to request developers meeting around April 17 or 18 in this mo=
14 messages
2014/04/03
[#61825] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/04/03
It's good if we have a meeting then.
[#61826] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/03
Regarding openssl issues, I=E2=80=99ve discussed possible meeting time with=
[#61833] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2014/04/03
Hi,
[#61847] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/03
Martin Boテ殕et <[email protected]> wrote:
[#61849] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I will post summary of meeting on Google docs after the meeting.
[#61852] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/04
Zachary Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
[#61860] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I=E2=80=99m ok with redmine, thanks for bringing up your concern!
[#62076] Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer. — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Hello,
7 messages
2014/04/17
[#62078] Re: Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer.
— SHIBATA Hiroshi <shibata.hiroshi@...>
2014/04/17
> And does anyone have counter proposal for 2.1 maintenance?
[ruby-core:62016] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9379] Support for using libxml-ruby as XML parser in xmlrpc-libs
From:
herwin@...
Date:
2014-04-14 07:28:37 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62016
Issue #9379 has been updated by Herwin .. I guess support for Nokogiri will be possible as well, I just needed something more efficient than REXML and libXML was the first thing I tried, and it just worked. Regarding your second point: that really needs some restructuring of loading the backends, I think that is a little bit outside the scope of this ticket. ---------------------------------------- Feature #9379: Support for using libxml-ruby as XML parser in xmlrpc-libs https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9379#change-46205 * Author: Herwin . * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Category: lib * Target version: ---------------------------------------- The default backend in the XMLRPC parser is REXML. This should work at most occasions, but it definitely isn't the fastest implementation. The attached patch allows a backend using libxml-ruby <http://xml4r.github.io/libxml-ruby/> which should be more efficient. It successfully passes the unit tests available in the file test/xmlrpc/test_parser.rb The default isn't changed in this patch, so when libxml-ruby isn't available nothing is changed. Even if it's available, you still have to change the parsing backend before it is used. ---Files-------------------------------- libxml-as-xmlrpc-parser.diff (1.79 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/