[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, [email protected] wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83249] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14011] Appveyor failure - svn 60172 - ‘webrick: do not hang acceptor on slow TLS connections’
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2017-10-13 00:50:50 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83249
[email protected] wrote: > Re this issue, it seems that it (mostly) involves code in ruby > openssl ot net/*, not code that's part of either webrick or > puma. OK, so the puma failures are independent of my webrick change (r60172), correct? Also, keep in mind puma uses it's own "minissl" C extension which could introduce more variables. But the ECONNRESET failure in TestNetHTTPS#test_certificate_verify_failure is new and probably the result of my webrick change? Does it still happen if you remove the WEBRick::Utils.timeout call I added and just call `sock.accept'? > I did mean http. IOW, puma set as a non ssl server works fine > run on a mingw trunk build with a Chrome client. When I try > to change it over to ssl (set verify_mode to none on client > and server, provide key and cert files, etc), the client I set > up in code can't connect. Similar 'host disconnected' errors. Weird, I was about to suggest multi-threading problems with the client and server sharing process memory; but Chrome and Ruby are already different processes... > Hope this helps. As to debugging, as it seems that the server > is failing/closing, I haven't looked for how I can trap that. > Reminder, I'm not a c type... Mainly, it's down to being stubborn and persistent :> Nobody starts off knowing C. I started out putting *printf statements in various places and editing code the same way I'd edit a config file until I got the results or info I wanted. But I don't even think you'd have to deal with C, since I only changed the Ruby code for webrick. Hopefully this gets figured out soon or usa or someone else can chime in. I'll be offline for a few days soonish. Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>