Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
  3. Article

An Approach to Database Preference Queries Based on an Outranking Relation

  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 01 August 2012
  • Volume 5, pages 789–804, (2012)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
Save article
View saved research
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript
An Approach to Database Preference Queries Based on an Outranking Relation
Download PDF
  • Patrick Bosc1,
  • Olivier Pivert1 &
  • Grégory Smits2 
  • 100 Accesses

  • 1 Citation

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

In this paper, we describe an approach to database preference queries based on the notion of outranking, suited to the situation where preferences on different attributes are not commensurable. This model constitutes an alternative to the use of Pareto order whose main drawback is to leave many tuples incomparable in general. Even though outranking does not define an order in the mathematical sense of the term, we describe a technique which yields a complete pre-order, based on a global aggregation of the outranking degrees computed for each pair of tuples, which reflects the global “quality” of a tuple w.r.t. the others.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Index Structures for Preference Database Queries

Chapter © 2017

Adaptive query relaxation and top-k result ranking over autonomous web databases

Article 16 August 2016

An experimental survey of regret minimization query and variants: bridging the best worlds between top-k query and skyline query

Article 14 September 2019

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Database Management
  • Data Engineering
  • Database Management System
  • Set Theory
  • Survey Methodology
  • Order, Lattices, Ordered Algebraic Structures
  • Preference Modeling in Decision Support Systems

References

  1. R. Agrawal and E. Wimmers. A framework for expressing and combining preferences. In Proc. of SIGMOD 2000, pages 297–306, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Bőrzsőnyi, D. Kossmann, and K. Stocker. The skyline operator. In Proc. of the 17th IEEE Inter. Conf. on Data Engineering, pages 421–430, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Bosc and O. Pivert. SQLf: A relational database language for fuzzy querying. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 3(1):1–17, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Bosc, O. Pivert, and G. Smits. A flexible querying approach based on outranking and classification. In Proc. of the 8th International Conference on Flexible Query Answering Systems (FQAS’09), pages 1–12, Roskilde, Denmark, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Bosc, O. Pivert, and G. Smits. A database preference query model based on a fuzzy outranking relation. In Proc. of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE’10), pages 38–43, Barcelona, Spain, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Bosc, O. Pivert, and G. Smits. A model based on outranking for database preference queries. In Proc. of the 13th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU’10), CCIS vol. 81, pages 95–104, Dortmund, Germany, 2010. Springer.

  7. C. Boutilier, R. Brafman, C. Domshlak, H. Hoos, and D. Poole. CP-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR), 21:135–191, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Brafman and C. Domshlak. Database preference queries revisited. Technical report, TR2004-1934, Cornell University, Computing and Information Science, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Bruno, S. Chaudhuri, and L. Gravano. Top-k selection queries over relational databases: mapping strategies and performance evaluation. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 27(2):153–187, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Chan, H. Jagadish, K. Tan, A. Tung, and Z. Zhang. Finding k-dominant skylines in high dimensional space. In Proc. of SIGMOD 2006, pages 503–514, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Chan, H. Jagadish, K. Tan, A. Tung, and Z. Zhang. On high dimensional skylines. In Proc. of EDBT 2006, LNCS 3896, pages 478–495, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Chomicki. Preference formulas in relational queries. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 28(4):427–466, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Dubois and H. Prade. Using fuzzy sets in flexible querying: Why and how? In Proc. of the 1996 Workshop on Flexible Query-Answering Systems (FQAS’96), pages 89–103, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Fagin. Fuzzy queries in multimedia database systems. In Proc. of PODS 1998, pages 1–10, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Hadjali, S. Kaci, and H. Prade. Database preference queries — A possibilistic logic approach with symbolic priorities. In Proc. of the 5th Symposium on the Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS’08), pages 291–310, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. Kießling. Foundations of preferences in database systems. In Proc. of the 28th VLDB Conference (VLDB’02), pages 311–322, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Kießling and G. Köstler. Preference SQL — Design, implementation, experiences. In Proc. of the 28th Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB’02), pages 990–1001, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. X. Lin, Y. Yuan, Q. Zhang, and Y. Zhang. Selecting stars: the k most representative skyline operator. In ICDE 2007, pages 86–95, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. Mousseau, R. Slowinski, and P. Zielniewicz. A user-oriented implementation of the ELECTRE-TRI method integrating preference elicitation support. Computers and Operations Research, 27:757–777, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Perny and B. Roy. The use of fuzzy outranking relations in preference modelling. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 49(1):33–53, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Roy. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision, 31:49–73, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Torlone and P. Ciaccia. Finding the best when it’s a matter of preference. In Proc. of the 10th Italian National Conf. on Advanced Data Base Systems (SEBD 2002), pages 347–360, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IRISA-ENSSAT, University of Rennes 1, 6, rue de Kerampont, BP 80518, 22305, Lannion Cedex, France

    Patrick Bosc & Olivier Pivert

  2. IRISA-IUT Lannion, University of Rennes 1, rue Edouard Branly, 22305, Lannion Cedex, France

    Grégory Smits

Authors
  1. Patrick Bosc
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olivier Pivert
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Grégory Smits
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Bosc.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bosc, P., Pivert, O. & Smits, G. An Approach to Database Preference Queries Based on an Outranking Relation. Int J Comput Intell Syst 5, 789–804 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2012.718161

Download citation

  • Received: 09 July 2012

  • Accepted: 18 July 2012

  • Published: 01 August 2012

  • Issue date: August 2012

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2012.718161

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Databases
  • preference queries
  • outranking

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature