Home Technology Exoskeleton transparency: feed-forward compensation vs. disturbance observer
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Exoskeleton transparency: feed-forward compensation vs. disturbance observer

  • Fabian Just

    Fabian Just received a M.Sc. degree in electrical and computer engineering from Purdue University (IN, USA) as well as a M.Sc. degree in automatic control from Ruhr-University Bochum (Germany). He is a PhD student at the Sensory-Motor Systems Lab of ETH Zurich. His main research focus is robotics, automatic control, machine learning, and neurorehabilitation.

    EMAIL logo
    , Özhan Özen

    Özhan Özen received his B.S. in Mechatronics Engineering from Sabanci University, and his MSc in Robotics, Systems & Control from ETH Zurich. He started his PhD at University of Bern, under the supervision of Laura Marchal-Crespo in 2017. His focus is making the robotics systems intelligent, adaptive and autonomous for neurorehabilitation.

    , Philipp Bösch

    Philipp Bösch received his B.Sc. in health science and technology from the ETH Zurich in 2017. He is currently finishing his M.Sc. in health science and technology focusing on medical technologies and rehabilitation engineering.

    , Hanna Bobrovsky

    Hanna Bobrovsky is a Master’s student majoring in Medical Technology at the ETH Zurich. Her current research interests involve neurorehabilitation, rehabilitation robotics and prosthetics.

    , Verena Klamroth-Marganska

    Verena Klamroth studied Human Medicine at Freie Universität and Humboldt-Universität in Berlin (Germany). She received her doctoral degree from Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster (Germany). Since 2008, she has been a medical advisor and the group leader of the ARMin project at the Sensory-Motor Systems Lab at ETH Zurich.

    , Robert Riener

    Robert Riener is full professor for Sensory-Motor Systems at the Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, and full professor of medicine at the University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich. He obtained a MSc in mechanical engineering in 1993 and a PhD in biomedical engineering 1997, both from TU München, Germany. In 2003 he became professor in Zurich. His main research focus is in rehabilitation robotics, virtual reality, and biomechanics. Riener has published more than 400 peer-reviewed articles, 20 book chapters and filed 23 patents. He is the initiator and organizer of the Cybathlon.

    and Georg Rauter

    Georg Rauter is assistant professor for medical robotics and mechatronics at the Department of Biomedical Engineering of University of Basel. The main focus of the research in his BIROMED Lab is: robotic endoscopes for laser ablation of hard tissue, bio-inspired sensor technologies for endoscopic navigation, tele manipulation, automation, kinematics, rehabilitation robotics, and control.

Published/Copyright: November 29, 2018

Abstract

Undesired forces during human-robot interaction limit training effectiveness with rehabilitation robots. Thus, avoiding such undesired forces by improved mechanics, sensorics, kinematics, and controllers are the way to increase exoskeleton transparency.

In this paper, the arm therapy exoskeleton ARMin IV+ was used to compare the differences in transparency offered by using the previous feed-forward model-based controller, with a disturbance observer in a study. Systematic analysis of velocity-dependent effects of controller transparency in single- and multi-joint scenarios performed in this study highlight the advantage of using disturbance observers for obtaining consistent transparency behavior at different velocities in single-joint and multi-joint movements. As the main result, the concept of the disturbance observer sets a new benchmark for ARMin transparency.

Zusammenfassung

Ungewollte Kräfte bei Mensch-Maschine Interaktionen limitieren die Trainingsqualität mit Rehabilitationsrobotern. Mit dem Vermeiden dieser ungewollten Kräfte durch verbesserte Mechanik, Sensorik, Kinematik und Regelungskonzepte wird die Transparenz des Exoskeletts erhöht. In diesem Beitrag wurde das Armexoskelett ARMin IV+ genutzt, um die zur Zeit verwendete modellbasierte Vorwärtssteuerung mit einem Störbeobachter in einer Studie zu vergleichen. Die systematische Analyse von geschwindigkeitsbasierten Effekten der Transparenz in Einzelgelenk- und Multigelenkszenarien hebt die Vorteile des Störbeobachters hervor, welcher konsistentes Transparenzverhalten bei verschiedenen Geschwindigkeiten während Einzelgelenk- und Multigelenksbewegungen zeigte. Als Hauptresultat setzt das Konzept des Störbeobachters einen neuen Maßstab für ARMin Transparenz.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 0-20075-15

Funding statement: This work was supported by ETH research grant 0-20075-15, ETH, UZH and the CRRP Neuro-Rehab, University of Zurich.

About the authors

Fabian Just

Fabian Just received a M.Sc. degree in electrical and computer engineering from Purdue University (IN, USA) as well as a M.Sc. degree in automatic control from Ruhr-University Bochum (Germany). He is a PhD student at the Sensory-Motor Systems Lab of ETH Zurich. His main research focus is robotics, automatic control, machine learning, and neurorehabilitation.

Özhan Özen

Özhan Özen received his B.S. in Mechatronics Engineering from Sabanci University, and his MSc in Robotics, Systems & Control from ETH Zurich. He started his PhD at University of Bern, under the supervision of Laura Marchal-Crespo in 2017. His focus is making the robotics systems intelligent, adaptive and autonomous for neurorehabilitation.

Philipp Bösch

Philipp Bösch received his B.Sc. in health science and technology from the ETH Zurich in 2017. He is currently finishing his M.Sc. in health science and technology focusing on medical technologies and rehabilitation engineering.

Hanna Bobrovsky

Hanna Bobrovsky is a Master’s student majoring in Medical Technology at the ETH Zurich. Her current research interests involve neurorehabilitation, rehabilitation robotics and prosthetics.

Verena Klamroth-Marganska

Verena Klamroth studied Human Medicine at Freie Universität and Humboldt-Universität in Berlin (Germany). She received her doctoral degree from Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster (Germany). Since 2008, she has been a medical advisor and the group leader of the ARMin project at the Sensory-Motor Systems Lab at ETH Zurich.

Robert Riener

Robert Riener is full professor for Sensory-Motor Systems at the Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, and full professor of medicine at the University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich. He obtained a MSc in mechanical engineering in 1993 and a PhD in biomedical engineering 1997, both from TU München, Germany. In 2003 he became professor in Zurich. His main research focus is in rehabilitation robotics, virtual reality, and biomechanics. Riener has published more than 400 peer-reviewed articles, 20 book chapters and filed 23 patents. He is the initiator and organizer of the Cybathlon.

Georg Rauter

Georg Rauter is assistant professor for medical robotics and mechatronics at the Department of Biomedical Engineering of University of Basel. The main focus of the research in his BIROMED Lab is: robotic endoscopes for laser ablation of hard tissue, bio-inspired sensor technologies for endoscopic navigation, tele manipulation, automation, kinematics, rehabilitation robotics, and control.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Michael Herold-Nadig and Yves Zimmermann for their constant, valuable support.

References

1. V. Klamroth-Marganska, J. Blanco, K. Campen, A. Curt, V. Dietz, T. Ettlin, M. Felder, B. Fellinghauer, M. Guidali, A. Kollmar and et al., Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial, The Lancet Neurology 13(2) (2014), 159–166.10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70305-3Search in Google Scholar

2. G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen and H. I. Krebs, Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair 22(2) (2008), 111–121.10.1177/1545968307305457Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. J. Mehrholz, M. Pohl, T. Platz, J. Kugler and B. Elsner, Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke, The Cochrane Library (2015).10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. N. Jarrassé, T. Proietti, V. Crocher, J. Robertson, A. Sahbani, G. Morel and A. Roby-Brami, Robotic exoskeletons: a perspective for the rehabilitation of arm coordination in stroke patients, Frontiers in human neuroscience 8 (2014), 947.10.3389/fnhum.2014.00947Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. T. Proietti, V. Crocher, A. Roby-Brami and N. Jarrassé, Upper-limb robotic exoskeletons for neurorehabilitation: a review on control strategies, IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering 9 (2016), 4–14.10.1109/RBME.2016.2552201Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. G. Rosati, R. Secoli, D. Zanotto, A. Rossi and G. Boschetti, Planar robotic systems for upper-limb post-stroke rehabilitation, in: ASME 2008 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 115–124, 2008.10.1115/IMECE2008-67273Search in Google Scholar

7. H. Kim, L. M. Miller, Z. Li, J. R. Roldan and J. Rosen, Admittance control of an upper limb exoskeleton-Reduction of energy exchange, in: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE, IEEE, pp. 6467–6470, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

8. M. Bannwart, M. Bolliger, P. Lutz, M. Gantner and G. Rauter, Systematic analysis of transparency in the gait rehabilitation device the FLOAT, in: Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV), 2016 14th International Conference on, IEEE, pp. 1–6, 2016.10.1109/ICARCV.2016.7838710Search in Google Scholar

9. H. Vallery, A. Duschau-Wicke and R. Riener, Optimized passive dynamics improve transparency of haptic devices, in: Robotics and Automation, 2009. ICRA’09. IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, pp. 301–306, 2009.10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152619Search in Google Scholar

10. W. van Dijk, H. van der Kooij, B. Koopman and E. H. F. Van Asseldonk, Improving the transparency of a rehabilitation robot by exploiting the cyclic behaviour of walking, in: Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, pp. 1–8, 2013.10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650393Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. R. Vertechy, A. Frisoli, A. Dettori, M. Solazzi and M. Bergamasco, Development of a new exoskeleton for upper limb rehabilitation, in: Rehabilitation Robotics, 2009. ICORR 2009. IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, pp. 188–193, 2009.10.1109/ICORR.2009.5209502Search in Google Scholar

12. N. Jarrasse, M. Tagliabue, J. V. G. Robertson, A. Maiza, V. Crocher, A. Roby-Brami and G. Morel, A methodology to quantify alterations in human upper limb movement during co-manipulation with an exoskeleton, IEEE Transactions on neural systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 18(4) (2010), 389–397.10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2056388Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. J. F. Veneman, R. Ekkelenkamp, R. Kruidhof, F. C. T. van der Helm and H. van der Kooij, A series elastic-and bowden-cable-based actuation system for use as torque actuator in exoskeleton-type robots, The international journal of robotics research 25(3) (2006), 261–281.10.1177/0278364906063829Search in Google Scholar

14. P. E. Dupont, Avoiding stick-slip through PD control, IEEE Transactions on automatic control 39(5) (1994), 1094–1097.10.1109/9.284901Search in Google Scholar

15. A. Sabanovic and K. Ohnishi, Motion control systems, John Wiley & Sons, 2011.10.1002/9780470825754Search in Google Scholar

16. D. A. Lawrence, Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation, IEEE transactions on robotics and automation 9(5) (1993), 624–637.10.1109/70.258054Search in Google Scholar

17. F. Just, K. Baur, R. Riener, V. Klamroth-Marganska and G. Rauter, Online adaptive compensation of the ARMin Rehabilitation Robot, in: Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, pp. 747–752, 2016.10.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523716Search in Google Scholar

18. F. Just, K. Baur, V. Klamroth-Marganska, R. Riener and G. Rauter, Motor Inertia Compensation of the ARMin Rehabilitation Robot, in: AUTOMED 2016: Workshop Wismar, 22.-23. September 2016 / Deutsche Gesellschaft für Biomedizinische Technik im VDE (O. Simanski, O. Hagendorf and J. Zucknik, eds.), Hochschule Wismar, 2016 (en).10.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523716Search in Google Scholar

19. K. R. S. Holzbaur, W. M. Murray and S. L. Delp, A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control, Annals of biomedical engineering 33(6) (2005), 829–840.10.1007/s10439-005-3320-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. T. Hothorn, F. Bretz and P. Westfall, Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models, Biometrical Journal 50(3) (2008), 346–363.10.1002/bimj.200810425Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2018-05-14
Accepted: 2018-10-25
Published Online: 2018-11-29
Published in Print: 2018-12-19

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/auto-2018-0069/html
Scroll to top button