About the journal


Cobiss

Computer Science and Information Systems 2019 Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages: 333-357
https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS181012005L
Full text ( 701 KB)
Cited by


A tripartite-graph based recommendation framework for price-comparison services

Lee Sang-Chul (Department of Computer and Software Hanyang University, Republic of Korea)
Kim Sang-Wook (Department of Computer and Software Hanyang University, Republic of Korea)
Park Sunju (School of Business Yonsei University, Republic of Korea)
Chae Dong-Kyu (Department of Computer and Software Hanyang University, Republic of Korea)

The recommender systems help users who are going through numerous items (e.g., movies or music) presented in online shops by capturing each user’s preferences on items and suggesting a set of personalized items that s/he is likely to prefer [8]. They have been extensively studied in the academic society and widely utilized in many online shops [33]. However, to the best of our knowledge, recommending items to users in price-comparison services has not been studied extensively yet, which could attract a great deal of attention from shoppers these days due to its capability to save users’ time who want to purchase items with the lowest price [31]. In this paper, we examine why existing recommendation methods cannot be directly applied to price-comparison services, and propose three recommendation strategies that are tailored to price-comparison services: (1) using click-log data to identify users’ preferences, (2) grouping similar items together as a user’s area of interest, and (3) exploiting the category hierarchy and keyword information of items. We implement these strategies into a unified recommendation framework based on a tripartite graph. Through our extensive experiments using real-world data obtained from Naver shopping, one of the largest price-comparison services in Korea, the proposed framework improved recommendation accuracy up to 87% in terms of precision and 129% in terms of recall, compared to the most competitive baseline.

Keywords: recommendation systems, price-comparison services, random walk with restart