What are PFAS, how are they used, and why do they matter?
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are widely used synthetic chemicals with strong carbon-fluorine bonds, making them highly persistent in the environment.
PFAS resist heat, water and chemicals, making them useful in products such as batteries, lubricants, non-stick cookware, water-repellent textiles, firefighting foams and food packaging.
Some PFAS last longer in the environment than any other synthetic substance. Exposure in people and animals continues to increase while PFAS continue to be released - but even if releases stopped today, PFAS would remain for generations.
PFAS pollution poses a significant and long-term threat to human health and ecosystems. Some restrictions for individual PFAS already exist but they often lead to the use of replacement chemicals that are also hazardous.
Extent of the PFAS issue
The primary way people are exposed to PFAS is through drinking water and food contaminated by PFAS pollution. This pollution originates from various sources, including industrial activities that produce or use PFAS, and products such as pesticides.
PFAS are also released when products containing them become waste.
Removing PFAS from waste is highly challenging, as only incineration at very high temperatures in hazardous waste facilities can eliminate them.

Impacts of PFAS pollution
Effects on unborn children- Delayed mammary gland development
- Lower birth weight
- Obesity
- Early puberty onset
- Increased miscarriage risk
- Lower sperm count and mobility
Effects on adults- Thyroid disease
- Breast cancer
- Liver cancer
- Kidney cancer
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Testicular cancer
- Increased time to pregnancy
- Pregnancy induced hypertension
Risks to the environment- Persistance and accumulation in the environment (soil, water, air), food, animals
- Disruption of ecosystems
The economic costs of PFAS pollution in Europe
If the current levels of pollution continue until 2050, the cost to society will reach €440 billion over that period.
Treating polluted water alone would cost more than €1 trillion.
However, tackling PFAS releases at the source could save €110 billion.
Swift action to reduce PFAS releases at source is by far the cheapest approach.
Why the EU is taking action
Risk of significant harm and risks to human health and the environment.Growing evidence links PFAS exposure to serious health and environmental harm.
Economic and social risk, intergenerational fairness.Cutting emissions early is the cheapest and most effective solution.
Strong EU business case for firm action.Safer alternatives to PFAS can be produced in the EU.
