gcj/318: local classes are named incorrectly

[Alexandre Petit-Bianco]

The following reply was made to PR gcj/318; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
To: java-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: gcj/318: local classes are named incorrectly
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 01:52:22 -0700 (PDT)

 bryce@albatross.co.nz writes:
 
 > This is because gcj names both the local classes "Locals$B"
 > instead of "Locals$1$B" and "Locals$2$B".
 > >How-To-Repeat:
 
 I've been aware of this problem. I also seem to remember that the way
 anonymous classes are named isn't right, though it doesn't really
 affect how programs run. Thank you.
 
 ./A