gcj/298

[Bryce McKinlay]

The following reply was made to PR gcj/298; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce@albatross.co.nz>
To: apbianco@redhat.com
Cc: java-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: gcj/298
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 15:49:13 +1300

 Alexandre Petit-Bianco wrote:
 
 > This makes sense -- do you happen to know where in the LRM all this is
 > specified.
 
 Nope. AFAIK, call resolution from inner classes isn't really specified
 anywhere. There are even various subtle differences in the way jikes and
 javac behave (javac seems more inclined to make guesses, while jikes is
 more likely to ask you for explicit qualification).
 
 I think the paragraph from the "1.1 update" page that Tom posted is about
 as good as it gets, it all depends on how you interpret it.
 
 regards
 
   [ bryce ]