refcounting basic_string<> and thread safety
Ryszard Kabatek
rysio@rumcajs.chemie.uni-halle.de
Thu Dec 30 07:30:00 GMT 1999
On 22 Jun 1999, Steinar Bang wrote:
> I'm guessing that the current refcounting <string> with gcc/egcs
> library isn't thread safe?
>
> Will the new basic_string<> delivered with libstdc++-v3 be thread
> safe?
Is it possible to have an efficient, thread save, refcounted string at all?
Ryszard Kabatek
Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Department of Physical Chemistry
Geusaer Str. 88, 06217 Merseburg, Germany
Tel. +49 3461 46 2487 (2466) Fax. +49 3461 46 2129
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list