Some shadow fixes.

[Steven King]

On Thu, 18 May 2000, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> > but clearly (I think) based on 7.3.3, this is wrong and the second using
> > std::abs should make ::abs(double) visable.
> 
> Sure, that is how it should work. In fact, this is how it *does* work.
> Compiling your program with 2.95.2, on i586-pc-linux-gnu, generates a
> call to abs__Fd in main.

   But I'm not using 2.95.2, I'm using 2.96 with --enable-libstdcxx-v3, which
automagically enables honor-std and it doesnt generate a call abs___Fd. If you
want to argue that 2.96 and honor-std is broken is this reguards, fine, but I'm
not the one you need to convince.  Meanwhile, I'd still like to get a
pedantically conforming library working....

-- 
Steven King
sxking@uswest.net