[PATCH] Re: 3 new fails with builtin patch

[Paolo Carlini]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>>Hi. However, why g++.old-deja/g++.other/builtins9.C does not fail during 
>>g++ regression testing? This I cannot understand because, to be honest, 
>>I don't know in detail how those tests are carried out. Perhaps are 
>>build not link?!? Roger (and Mark) of course meant to link too, but...
>>
>Dunno.
>
Now I know why.
Just look at g++.log: all those g++.old-deja/g++.other tests are built 
/o/n/l/y -O2
In order to properly test what was meant to test, it is needed a:

2002-03-30  Paolo Carlini  <pcarlini@unitus.it>

        * g++.old-deja/g++.other/builtins9.C: Build -O0.

--- builtins9.C.~1.1.~    2002-03-29 21:41:51.000000000 +0100
+++ builtins9.C    2002-03-30 18:29:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 // Test that inline redeclarations of builtins are emitted.
 // Origin: Roger Sayle  Mar 28, 2002
+// Special g++ Options: -O0
 // Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation.
 
 namespace std {


Ciao.
P.