RFC: Faster cp_lexer_peek_token [revised]

[Zack Weinberg]

Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM> writes:

> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:51:03 -0700, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > I think that's pretty compelling, and I'm actually pretty sanguine about
>> > the safety of the patch.  I've reviewed the patch and I'm happy with it.  I
>> > certainly agree that issuing the diagnostics on the line with the function
>> > declaration is a win.
>> >
>> > I think that it would be good for Jason to comment, before we make a final
>> > decision
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 03:41:19PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> I agree.
>
> You agree that it would be good for you to comment, or you agree that you
> are happy with the patch? :-)

I hope he meant the latter, because I thought that's what he meant and
therefore I checked the patch in about three hours ago.

zw