Fallout (mostly runtime library-related) from GCC version number change (take two)

[Paolo Carlini]

Zack Weinberg wrote:

>>Sure and easy.
>>
>>What happens here, on x86-linux, for a very simple
>>--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-exp configure, is that the whole set of
>>libstdc++ headers, that should be installed under
>>/usr/local/gcc-exp/include/c++/4.1.0/, ends up inside
>>/usr/local/gcc-exp/include/c++/const/
>>    
>>
>Hmm.  I get them in $prefix/include/c++, no intermediate directory.
>That's not right either, I take it?
>  
>
Hum, yes, unfortunately.

Basically (cmp also 
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01542.html) what is 
currently happening is that in the whole installed tree, where '4.1.0' 
should appear you find 'const' instead.

That 4.1.0 intermediate directory should be restored everywhere not removed.

Paolo.