Testing parallel mode and PR34106

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 11/12/2007, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Should I be able to run "make check-parallel" with no FAILs?  Even
> > before I touched any parallel headers I'm seeing several failures.
>
> There are currently 10 fails in parallel mode. You're not going crazy.

phew!  :)  thanks for the list of known fails.

> I haven't had a chance to look much into the other issue, WRT atomics.
> Sorry.

No problem, I was just throwing some ideas around.  I'm sort of
thinking that none of he current approaches to configuring concurrency
support in the lib is generic enough to form an API.  The current
solutions are all implementation details that work for the specific
cases they were designed for.  Parallel mode already demonstrates
something more is needed.

Jon