[v3] 4.4/4.5 evolution doc updates

Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini@oracle.com
Tue Jan 5 21:07:00 GMT 2010


On 01/05/2010 09:55 PM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> What's up with the <random> serialization operators? Are these best
> described as an extension? I realize that's still in a bit of flux
> (although aiming at N3000?). 
>   
I'm not completely sure to understand your question: as I read N3000
(not a trivial task, because you always have to mentally "de-conceptify"
the specifications, for now), both engines and distributions have both
operator<< and operator>>, as far as I can see (26.5.2.3 and 26.5.2.5),
which we do provide. I don't think we can do much more / better until
Walter makes available the updated specifications...

Paolo.



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list