| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This commit extends the constructor routine of BackgroundPsql.pm with a
new "wait" parameter. If set to 0, the routine returns without waiting
for psql to start, ready to consume input.
background_psql() in Cluster.pm gains the same "wait" parameter. The
default behavior is still to wait for psql to start. It becomes now
possible to not wait, giving to TAP scripts the possibility to perform
actions between a BackgroundPsql startup and its wait_connect() call.
Author: Jacob Champion
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOYmi+=60deN20WDyCoHCiecgivJxr=98s7s7-C8SkXwrCfHXg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
adf97c156 gave ExprStates the ability to hash expressions and return a
single hash value. That commit supports seeding the hash value with an
initial value to have that blended into the final hash value.
Here we fix a hypothetical bug where if there are zero expressions to
hash, the initial value is stored in the wrong location. The existing
code stored the initial value in an intermediate location expecting that
when the expressions were hashed that those steps would store the final
hash value in the ExprState.resvalue field. However, that wouldn't happen
when there are zero expressions to hash. The correct thing to do instead
is to have a special case for zero expressions and when we hit that case,
store the initial value directly in the ExprState.resvalue. The reason
that this is a hypothetical bug is that no code currently calls
ExecBuildHash32Expr passing a non-zero initial value.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpMAL_zxbMRr1LOex3O7Y7R7ZN2i8iUFLQhqQiJMAg3qw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This adds a Git .mailmap to unify spellings of committer names.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
Commit 99b937a44f introduced this warning when you run "meson setup":
Configuring Makefile.global using configuration
../src/meson.build:31: WARNING: The variable(s) 'PG_TEST_EXTRA' in the input file 'src/Makefile.global.in' are not present in the given configuration data.
To fix, add PG_TEST_EXTRA to the list of variables that are not needed
in the makefiles generated by meson. In meson builds, the makefiles
are only used for PGXS, not for building or testing the server itself.
Reported-by: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
PgStat_HashKey is currently initialized in a way that could result in
random data if the structure has any padding bytes. The structure
has no padding bytes currently, fortunately, but it could become a
problem should the structure change at some point in the future.
The code is changed to use some memset(0) so as any padding would be
handled properly, as it would be surprising to see random failures in
the pgstats entry lookups. PgStat_HashKey is a structure internal to
pgstats, and an ABI change could be possible in the scope of a bug fix,
so backpatch down to 15 where this has been introduced.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Reviewed-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
We had been using "diff -upd", which evidently works for most people,
but Solaris's diff doesn't like it. (We'd not noticed because the
Solaris buildfarm animals weren't running this test until they were
upgraded to the latest buildfarm client script.) Change to "diff -U3"
which is what pg_regress has used for ages.
Per buildfarm (and off-list discussion with Noah Misch).
Back-patch to v16 where this test was added. In v16,
also back-patch the relevant part of 628c1d1f2 so that
the test script looks about the same in all branches.
|
|
This commit reverts 3c5db1d6b0, and subsequent improvements and fixes
including 8036d73ae3, 867d396ccd, 3ac3ec580c, 0868d7ae70, 85b98b8d5a,
2520226c95, 014f9f34d2, e658038772, e1555645d7, 5035172e4a, 6cfebfe88b,
73da6b8d1b, and e546989a26.
The reason for reverting is a set of remaining issues. Most notably, the
stored procedure appears to need more effort than the utility statement
to turn the backend into a "snapshot-less" state. This makes an approach
to use stored procedures questionable.
Catversion is bumped.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zyhj2anOPRKtb0xW%40paquier.xyz
|
|
Reported-by: [email protected]
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: master
|
|
Sloppy refactoring in commit cca97ce6a caused these programs
to pass dbname = NULL to libpq if there was no "--dbname" switch
on the command line, where before "replication" would be passed.
This didn't break things completely, because the source server doesn't
care about the dbname specified for a physical replication connection.
However, it did cause libpq to fail to match a ~/.pgpass entry that
has "replication" in the dbname field. Restore the previous behavior
of passing "replication".
Also, closer inspection shows that if you do specify a dbname
in the connection string, that is what will be matched to ~/.pgpass,
not "replication". This was the pre-existing behavior so we should
not change it, but the SGML docs were pretty misleading about it.
Improve that.
Per bug #18685 from Toshi Harada. Back-patch to v17 where the
error crept in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
revert of change from commit 641a5b7a144
Reported-by: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: master
|
|
Previously, we sorted rules by schema name and then rule name;
if that wasn't unique, we sorted by rule OID. This can be
problematic for comparing dumps from databases with different
histories, especially since certain rule names like "_RETURN"
are very common. Let's make the sort key schema name, rule name,
table name, which should be unique. (This is the same behavior
we've long used for triggers and RLS policies.)
Andreas Karlsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
Author: Tender Wang
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXN%3D3sH2sNw4nC3QGCEVw1Lftmw9m5y1Xje0bXK6ApDrsPQ%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
_bt_first doesn't necessarily hold onto a buffer pin on success exit.
Fix header comments that claimed that we'll always hold onto a pin.
Oversight in commit 2ed5b87f96.
|
|
Some functions were using square brackets instead, replace them all
with <optional>.
Author: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: jian he <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACJufxFfUbSph5UUSsZbL4SitbuPuW%[email protected]
|
|
Remove a local variable that was used to avoid overwriting strat_total
with the = operator strategy when a >= operator strategy key was already
included in the initial positioning/insertion scan keys by _bt_first
(for backwards scans it would have to be a <= key that was included).
_bt_first's strat_total local variable now simply tracks the operator
strategy of the final scan key that was included in the scan's insertion
scan key (barring the case where the !used_all_subkeys row compare path
adjusts strat_total in its own way).
_bt_first already treated >= keys (or <= keys) as = keys for initial
positioning purposes. There is no good reason to remember that that was
what happened; no later _bt_first step cares about the distinction.
Note, in particular, that the insertion scan key's 'nextkey' and
'backward' fields will be initialized the same way regardless.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=PKR6rB7qbx+Vnd7eqeB5VTcrW=iJvAsTsKbdG+kW_UA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Split ProcSleep into two functions: JoinWaitQueue and ProcSleep.
JoinWaitQueue is called while holding the partition lock, and inserts
the current process to the wait queue, while ProcSleep() does the
actual sleeping. ProcSleep() is now called without holding the
partition lock, and it no longer re-acquires the partition lock before
returning. That makes the wakeup a little cheaper. Once upon a time,
re-acquiring the partition lock was needed to prevent a signal handler
from longjmping out at a bad time, but these days our signal handlers
just set flags, and longjmping can only happen at points where we
explicitly run CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS().
If JoinWaitQueue detects an "early deadlock" before even joining the
wait queue, it returns without changing the shared lock entry, leaving
the cleanup of the shared lock entry to the caller. This makes the
handling of an early deadlock the same as the dontWait=true case.
One small user-visible side-effect of this refactoring is that we now
only set the 'ps' title to say "waiting" when we actually enter the
sleep, not when the lock is skipped because dontWait=true, or when a
deadlock is detected early before entering the sleep.
This eliminates the 'lockAwaited' global variable in proc.c, which was
largely redundant with 'awaitedLock' in lock.c
Note: Updating the local lock table is now the caller's responsibility.
JoinWaitQueue and ProcSleep are now only responsible for modifying the
shared state. Seems a little nicer that way.
Based on Thomas Munro's earlier patch and observation that ProcSleep
doesn't really need to re-acquire the partition lock.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Orlov
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
Suppose that you run a command like "pg_combinebackup b1 b2 -o output",
but both b1 and b2 contain an INCREMENTAL.$something file in a directory
that is expected to contain relation files. This is an error, but the
previous code would not detect the problem and instead write a garbage
full file named $something to the output directory. This commit adds
code to detect the error and a test case to verify the behavior.
It's difficult to imagine that this will ever happen unless someone
is intentionally trying to break incremental backup, but per discussion,
let's consider that the lack of adequate sanity checking in this area is
a bug and back-patch to v17, where incremental backup was introduced.
Patch by me, reviewed by Bertrand Drouvot and Amul Sul.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaD7dBYPqe7kMtO0dyto7rd0rUh7joh=JPUSaFszKY6Pg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This function is always called with a relative_path that ends in a
slash, so there's no need to insert a second one. So, don't. Instead,
add an assertion to verify that nothing gets broken in the future, and
adjust the comments.
While this is not a critical bug, the duplicate slash is visible in
error messages, which could create confusion, so back-patch to v17.
This is also better in that it keeps the code consistent across
branches.
Patch by me, reviewed by Bertrand Drouvot and Amul Sul.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaD7dBYPqe7kMtO0dyto7rd0rUh7joh=JPUSaFszKY6Pg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Reported-by: Erik Rijkers (private email)
Backpatch-through: master
|
|
LockAcquire is a long and complex function. Pushing more stuff to its
subroutines makes it a little more manageable.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Orlov
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
Previously, ProcSleep()'s caller was responsible for setting
MyProc->heldLocks, and we had comments to remind about that. But it
seems simpler to make ProcSleep() itself responsible for it.
ProcSleep() already set the other info about the lock its waiting for
(waitLock, waitProcLock and waitLockMode), so it is natural for it to
set heldLocks too.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Orlov
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
_bt_endpoint is a helper function for _bt_first that's called whenever
no useful insertion scan key can be used, and we need to lock and read
either the leftmost or rightmost leaf page in the index. Simplify and
document its preconditions, relieving its _bt_first caller from having
to end the parallel scan when it returns false.
Also stop unnecessarily invalidating the current scan position in nearby
code in both _bt_first and _bt_endpoint. This seems to have been
copy-pasted from _bt_readnextpage, where invalidating the scan's current
position really is necessary.
Follow-up to the refactoring work in commit 1bd4bc85.
|
|
We reach this case also e.g. when a deadlock is detected, not only
when we run out of memory.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Orlov
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
The Meson builds have PG_TEST_EXTRA as a configure-time variable,
which was not available in the Make builds. To ensure both build
systems are in sync, PG_TEST_EXTRA is now added as a configure-time
variable. It can be set like this:
./configure PG_TEST_EXTRA="kerberos, ssl, ..."
Note that to preserve the old behavior, this configure-time variable
is overridden by the PG_TEST_EXTRA environment variable when you run
the tests.
Author: Jacob Champion
Reviewed by: Ashutosh Bapat, Nazir Bilal Yavuz
|
|
"meson test" used to ignore the PG_TEST_EXTRA environment variable,
which meant that in order to run additional tests, you had to run
"meson setup -DPG_TEST_EXTRA=...". That's somewhat expensive, and not
consistent with autoconf builds. Allow PG_TEST_EXTRA environment
variable to override the setup-time option at run time, so that you
can do "PG_TEST_EXTRA=... meson test".
To implement this, the configuration time value is passed as an extra
"--pg-test-extra" argument to testwrap instead of adding it to the
test environment. If the environment variable is set at the time of
running test, testwrap uses the value from the environment variable
and ignores the --pg-test-extra option.
Now that "meson test" obeys the environment variable, we can remove it
from the "meson setup" steps in the CI script. It will now be picked
up from the environment variable like with "make check".
Author: Nazir Bilal Yavuzk, Ashutosh Bapat
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat with inputs from Tom Lane and Andrew Dunstan
|
|
Commit 745217a051 misses updating the new behavior of generated columns in
logical replication at a few places.
Reported-by: Peter Smith, Ajin Cherian
Author: Vignesh C
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2JOO7szz9+uaQbjmgZOfzbM_9tAQdFF8H5BjkQeaJs0A@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
arrays.sql was already missing it before 49d6c7d8daba, and I have just
noticed it thanks to this commit. The second one in test_slru has been
introduced by 768a9fd5535f.
|
|
Buildfarm member mamba fails to deduce that the function never uses this
variable without initializing it. Back-patch to v12, like commit
b412f402d1e020c5dac94f3bf4a005db69519b99.
|
|
A CacheInvalidateHeapTuple* callee might call
CatalogCacheInitializeCache(), which needs a relcache entry. Acquiring
a valid relcache entry might scan pg_class. Hence, to prevent
undetected LWLock self-deadlock, CacheInvalidateHeapTuple* callers must
not hold BUFFER_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE on buffers of pg_class. Move the
CacheInvalidateHeapTupleInplace() before the BUFFER_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE. No
back-patch, since I've reverted commit
243e9b40f1b2dd09d6e5bf91ebf6e822a2cd3704 from non-master branches.
Reported by Alexander Lakhin. Reviewed by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
Commit a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257 enlarged the work done
here under the pg_class heap buffer lock. Two preexisting actions are
best done before holding that lock. Both RelationGetNumberOfBlocks()
and visibilitymap_count() do I/O, and the latter might exclusive-lock a
visibility map buffer. Moving these reduces contention and risk of
undetected LWLock deadlock. Back-patch to v12, like that commit.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
Reported-by: [email protected]
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: master
|
|
Reported-by: [email protected]
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: master
|
|
Reported-by: Agustín
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: master
|
|
It used to refer to CREATE DOMAIN, but CREATE DOMAIN allows NULL, while
ALTER DOMAIN does not.
Reported-by: [email protected]
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
Done for libpq, postgres-fdw, and psql.
Reported-by: [email protected]
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwZ-T-zsVM7gApS9-XU9vGxC7Oa-UyRQPVcJFagNU=AjOw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: master
|
|
Reported-by: [email protected]
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: master
|
|
Oversight revealed by buildfarm.
|
|
Add README.non-ASCII to explain non-ASCII doc behavior; some text moved
from release.sgml.
Change UTF8 SGML characters to use HTML entities.
Remove unnecessary UTF8 spaces.
Add SVG file check for check-nbsp target.
Add dummy 'pdf' Makefile target.
Reported-by: Yugo Nagata
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: master
|
|
Oversight in commit 5bf748b8.
|
|
Replace with Strawberry Perl and Magicsplat Tcl.
Reported-by: Yasir Hussain
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA9OW9fAAM_WDYYpAquqF6j1hmfRMzHPsFkRfP5E6oSfkF=dMA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
Instead of talking about setting latches, which is a pretty low-level
mechanism, emphasize that they wake up other processes.
This is in preparation for replacing Latches with a new abstraction.
That's still work in progress, but this seems a little tidier anyway,
so let's get this refactoring out of the way already.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/391abe21-413e-4d91-a650-b663af49500c%40iki.fi
|
|
This is in preparation for replacing Latches with a new abstraction.
That's still work in progress, but this seems a little tidier anyway,
so let's get this refactoring out of the way already.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/391abe21-413e-4d91-a650-b663af49500c%40iki.fi
|
|
After a closer lookup, this makes the all-zero check of the page more
expensive, so let's remove the new function call in bufpage.c. The
maths of the check were also incorrect, checking that the page was full
of zeros only for the first 1kB.
This brings back the code to the state it was at 49d6c7d8daba.
Per discussion with David Rowley and Bertrand Drouvot.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrXzPAr3FxoBuB7b3D-okNoNA2jxLun1rW8Yw5wkbqusw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This new function tests if a memory region starting at a given location
for a defined length is made only of zeroes. This unifies in a single
path the all-zero checks that were happening in a couple of places of
the backend code:
- For pgstats entries of relation, checkpointer and bgwriter, where
some "all_zeroes" variables were previously used with memcpy().
- For all-zero buffer pages in PageIsVerifiedExtended().
This new function uses the same forward scan as the check for all-zero
buffer pages, applying it to the three pgstats paths mentioned above.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Heikki Linnakangas, Peter Smith
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
This function takes in input an array, and reverses the position of all
its elements. This operation only affects the first dimension of the
array, like array_shuffle().
The implementation structure is inspired by array_shuffle(), with a
subroutine called array_reverse_n() that may come in handy in the
future, should more functions able to reverse portions of arrays be
introduced.
Bump catalog version.
Author: Aleksander Alekseev
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Tom Lane, Vladlen Popolitov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TMpeO_ke+QGOaAx9xdJuxa7r=49-anMh3G5476e3CX1CA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This patch responds to a comment that I (tgl) made in the
discussion leading up to 774171c4f, that really all errors
occurring during raw parsing should provide error cursors.
Syntax errors reported by Bison will have one, and most of
the handwritten ereport's in gram.y already provide one,
but there were a few stragglers.
(It is not claimed that this handles every failure reachable
during raw parsing --- out-of-memory is an obvious exception.
But this makes a good start on cases that are likely to occur.)
While we're at it, clean up the reported positions for errors
associated with LIMIT/OFFSET clauses. Previously we were
relying on applying exprLocation() to the contained expressions,
but that leads to slightly odd cursor placement, e.g.
regression=# (select * from foo limit 10) limit 10;
ERROR: multiple LIMIT clauses not allowed
LINE 1: (select * from foo limit 10) limit 10;
^
We can afford to keep a little more state in the transient
SelectLimit structs in order to make that better.
Jian He and Tom Lane (extracted from a larger patch by Jian,
with some additional work by me)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxEmONE3P2En=jopZy1m=cCCUs65M4+1o52MW5og9oaUPA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This allows an error cursor to be supplied for a bunch of
bad-function-definition errors that previously lacked one,
or that cheated a bit by pointing at the contained type name
when the error isn't really about that.
Bump catversion from an abundance of caution --- I don't think
this node type can actually appear in stored views/rules, but
better safe than sorry.
Jian He and Tom Lane (extracted from a larger patch by Jian,
with some additional work by me)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxEmONE3P2En=jopZy1m=cCCUs65M4+1o52MW5og9oaUPA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Buildfarm member 'prion', which is configured with
-DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, failed with errors
like this:
ERROR: could not read blocks 0..0 in file "global/2672": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
while running a parallel test group that includes VACUUM FULL on some
catalog tables among other things. I was not able to reproduce that
just by running the tests with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE
-DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, even though 'prion' hit it on first run
after commit 2b9b8ebbf8, so there might be something else that makes
it more susceptible to the race. However, I was able to reproduce it
by adding another test to the same test group that runs "vacuum full
pg_database" repeatedly.
The problem is that RelationReloadIndexInfo() no longer calls
RelationInitPhysicalAddr() on a nailed, shared index, when an
invalidation happens early during backend startup, before the critical
relcaches have been built. Before commit 2b9b8ebbf8, that was done by
RelationReloadNailed(), but it went missing from that path. Add it
back as an explicit step.
Broken by commit 2b9b8ebbf8, which refactored these functions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/db876575-8f5b-4193-a538-df7e1f92d47a%40iki.fi
|
|
A few comments contained duplicate "the" in sentences, fix by removing
one occurrence.
Author: Vignesh C <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2aEEiPwGJmPdzBxROVvs8n75yCjKz4K1f1B2TdWpzxTA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The old RelationClearRelation function did different things depending
on the arguments and circumstances. It could:
a) remove the relation completely from relcache (rebuild == false),
b) mark the entry as invalid (rebuild == true, but not in xact), or
c) rebuild the entry (rebuild == true).
Different callers used it for different purposes, and often assumed a
particular behavior, which was confusing. Split it into three
different functions, one for each of the above actions (one of them,
RelationInvalidateRelation, was already added in commit e6cd857726).
Move the responsibility of choosing the action and calling the right
function to the callers.
Reviewed-by: jian he <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9c9e8908-7b3e-4ce7-85a8-00c0e165a3d6%40iki.fi
|
