From 4c1d853fd8c7ed832a231699512dc3f0fb6376fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 00:03:18 +0200
Subject: doc: Clarify project naming

Clarify the project naming in the history section of the docs
to match the recent license preamble changes.

Backpatch to all supported versions.

Author: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+OCxozLzK2+Jc14XZyWXSp6L9Ot+3efwXUE35FJG=fsbib2EA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
---
 doc/src/sgml/history.sgml | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

(limited to 'doc')

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/history.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/history.sgml
index 3bf60fc563b..070cfb8c94b 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/history.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/history.sgml
@@ -197,11 +197,10 @@
   </para>
 
   <para>
-   Many people continue to refer to
-   <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> as <quote>Postgres</quote>
-   (now rarely in all capital letters) because of tradition or because
-   it is easier to pronounce.  This usage is widely accepted as a
-   nickname or alias.
+   <productname>Postgres</productname> is still considered an official
+   project name, both because of tradition and because people find it
+   easier to pronounce <productname>Postgres</productname> than
+   <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>.
   </para>
 
   <para>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3