Cache/Index retention #1304
Unanswered
Darkassassin07
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 3 comments
-
|
What I know is that the index is currently memory-based. In the future, there will be a SQLite database, so I guess that's where it'll be stored on disk. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I have created a release that utilizes sqlite to improve memory performance, would love to get feedback |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I'm not seeing it on docker; am I just too early? /edit, I was too early. Tag: '1.1.2-experimental-sqlite' Gonna let it run for a day or so, and I'll be back. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have noticed that when my filebrowser container is restarted, after updates or after manually stopping and starting, the entire index has to be rebuilt from scratch. (all the folders contain '0 bytes' until they're re-scanned)
Is the index stored within the container, in a location I can map to the host and retain? Or is it only stored in memory?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions