Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Alexendoo (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

• @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
• @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

Thanks for the fix! Yeah you did everything right

As an aside, maybe iter.map(...).next() could be linted against? I don't see that ever being preferred over iter.next().map(...), and it could've prevented the bug here.

Could be a good one, it would make it clearer that it's only happening to the first item

@bors r+

📌 Commit 0dd8b27 has been approved by Alexendoo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

⌛ Testing commit 0dd8b27 with merge 6e6683b...

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: Alexendoo
Pushing 6e6683b to master...