On 9/19/07, Marcello Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you use it in cat apps on in plain dbic ?
>
> Could you provide an example of usage ?
http://www.onemogin.com/blog/554-profile-your-catalystdbixclass-app-with-querylog.html
The syntax has changed a bit due to the Analyzer, but you should
On 9/19/07, Marcello Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all, thanks for the response and for your tip.
>
> I get the info out of querylog by putting it into the stash and by
> calling its methods from the same template used in the docs of the
> schema module (the only difference being I d
On 9/19/07, Marcello Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again on querylog vs. catalyst...
>
> I've setup a minimal app to test the querylog stuff, but, I can't get
> any results, i.e. the statistics obtained from querylog are always zero.
>
> The attached file contains the entire app; here I show
an, I want this ;)
> >
> > Marcus Ramberg
> >
> > On 9/1/07, Fayland Lam < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > hi, guys.
> > >
> > > since I can't touch Cory Watson by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > so I won
On 8/23/07, John Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For while I've been thinking it would be nice to have a Cat-based CMS with
> multiple features built on top of a platform. The platform can include basic
> things like Authn, Authz, Sessions, a basic user schema and pre-built HTML.
> The pre-built
On 8/23/07, Simon Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want sledgehammers, Bricolage and Krang are probably the beefiest
> ones you can find :-)
>
> www.bricolage.cc & www.krangcms.com
Bricolage I was aware of, but krang is new to me.
> They'll do all that you want (less perhaps a certain a
On 8/23/07, Matt Rosin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Catalyst makes it easy to build a site with lots of little modules of
> content composing a single page - the actual content (words/images)
> being scattered in static apache directories, the database, the
> templates folders and the code. At some
On 4/17/07, Nigel Metheringham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have an existing application which I want to add some basic data
graphing operations to.
*snip*
My initial inclination would be to have a wrapper URL which generates
pretty much a HTML frame and a IMG tag in it pointing to another ca
On 12/2/06, Sebastian Riedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> So I still believe in Catalyst, but my opinion is that "The elegant
> framework" should first prove that it is really elegant.
That slogan was chosen at a different time, long ago, i don't think it
applies anymore.
On 11/16/06, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tire of being repeatedly berated for thinking it would be
> cool for someone to create a benchmark based on the criticisms
> of those of you that can lend advice.
Oh, no doubt that would be cool. Ponies are also cool. ;-)
And since I'm n
On 11/16/06, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Cory Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-16 14:40]:
> I respectfully suggest that those who criticize his work should
> use their energies to /improve/ his test rather than merely
> dismissing it as worthless. Usi
On 11/16/06, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cory Watson wrote:
> My original intent was to prod someone that is knowledgeable enough of
> Catalyst's internals to criticize this benchmark's methods to create a
> benchmark that is more friendly to Cat
On 11/16/06, Carl Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It shows that in one circumstance,
> Catalyst is sadly slow. Let's fix that.
Matt has just pointed out that Cat's optimised for large applications
with lots of paths, and for flexible programming.
Only fix it if that doesn't compromise thi
On 11/16/06, Carl Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 16/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Essentially, according to his test, which doesn't take into account
> ORM performance, Rails & Django knock the socks of Catalyst.
The first thing I noticed was that the content
14 matches
Mail list logo
