British doctor and minister
| Born | 1614 |
| Died | 1697 |
31 works Add another?
Most Editions
Most Editions
First Published
Most Recent
Top Rated
Reading Log
Trending
Random
British doctor and minister
| Born | 1614 |
| Died | 1697 |
Subjects
Early works to 1800, Controversial literature, Infant baptism, Church of England, Clergy, Socinianism, Baptism, Conversion, Election (Theology), Religious Dissenters, Christianity, Justification (Christian theology), Anabaptists, Antinomianism, Circumcision, Congregational churches, Congregational churches in the United States, Congregationalism, Covenants, Dissenters, Religious, English Sermons, Liturgy, Meditation, Ordination, SalariesPeople
Charles I King of England (1600-1649), Daniel Cawdrey (1588-1664), Edward Stillingfleet (1635-1699), Philalethes Pasiphilus, Simon Patrick (1626-1707), Stephen Marshall (1594?-1655), Thomas Blake (1597?-1657), William Laud (1573-1645), Benjamin Keach (1640-1704), Daniel Cawdry (1588-1664), Giles Firmin (1614-1697), John Gauden (1605-1662), John Templer (-1693), John Templer (d. 1693), Richard Baxter (1615-1691), Richard Davis (1658-1714), Thomas Grantham (1634-1692), Thomas Hooker (1586-1647), Tobias Crisp (1600-1643), William Falkner (-1682), William Falkner (d. 1682)Time
Early works to 1800ID Numbers
- OLID: OL425963A
- ISNI: 0000000063116597
- Library of Congress Names: n85010454
- VIAF: 2814733
- Wikidata: Q5561652
- Inventaire.io: wd:Q5561652
Links outside Open Library
No links yet. Add one?
| July 31, 2025 | Edited by WikidataBot | [sync_author_identifiers_with_wikidata] add wikidata remote identifiers |
| September 30, 2020 | Edited by MARC Bot | add ISNI |
| March 31, 2017 | Edited by MARC Bot | add VIAF and wikidata ID |
| June 7, 2012 | Edited by VacuumBot | Removed period from death date |
| April 1, 2008 | Created by an anonymous user | initial import |
![Cover of: Separation examined: or, A treatise vvherein the grounds for separation from the ministry and churches of England are weighed, and found too light. The practise proved to be not onely unwarrantable, but likewise so hurtful to the churches, that church-reformation cannot with any comfort go forward so long as such separation is tolerated. Also an humble request presented to the Congregational Divines, that [since the differences between them and the classical-divines are very small] they would please to strike in with the classical-divines in carrying on the worke of Reformation, before the inundation of these corrupt opinions, have destroyed both ordinances and religion Cover of: Separation examined: or, A treatise vvherein the grounds for separation from the ministry and churches of England are weighed, and found too light. The practise proved to be not onely unwarrantable, but likewise so hurtful to the churches, that church-reformation cannot with any comfort go forward so long as such separation is tolerated. Also an humble request presented to the Congregational Divines, that [since the differences between them and the classical-divines are very small] they would please to strike in with the classical-divines in carrying on the worke of Reformation, before the inundation of these corrupt opinions, have destroyed both ordinances and religion](http://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/13157462-M.jpg)