Re: Problems with infinity
От | Oliver Siegmar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problems with infinity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | [email protected] обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problems with infinity (Kris Jurka <[email protected]>) |
Ответы |
Re: Problems with infinity
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 01:50, Kris Jurka wrote: > The counter argument is that eventually the todo item will be done and > that the supposed "cleanliness" is just an illusion because no other > database is going to allow you store a timestamp of Long.MAX_VALUE so > there is already an implicit assumption of using pg, why not make it > explicit? I did some research to find other databases / jdbc drivers that are able to set infinity values for timestamps. Unfortunately I haven't found one. Oracle seems to support infinity values but I couldn't find any driver implementation details. Does someone here has kwnoledge about different jdbc implementations and their infinity usage? The current infinity implementation in pgjdbc is a hack, because you have to set/get magic values that represents '-infinity' and 'infinity', but it is imho the best way to do until there might be an NEGATIVE_INFINITY and POSITIVE_INFINTIY for java.util.Date like the one for java.lang.Double. Oliver
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: