Re: GIT move

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Maciek Sakrejda <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Did this happen ?
>>>
>>
>> Not completely.  I'm most of the way through it, but was not able to
>> finish last night.  I will complete the move today.
>
> Great to hear; please let me know if you hit any issues with the
> transition scripts.
>
> Also, vaguely on this topic, I'm not sure if there's a formal plan for
> methods of accepting patches (e.g., via github pull requests), but I
> highly recommend that all patches be required to be rebased against
> trunk/master, resulting in fast-forward merges into the main tree.
> This makes history much simpler to follow (no merge nodes) without a
> significant downside.
>

Currently the main project still requires a context patch as well


Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca