World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 42 2080 1879 52 47 261 7068

John Rolfe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Rolfe between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Rolfe published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2010. 15 of the 318 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2010. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 10 publications
1991 2025

318 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Rolfe: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 2
1997 4
1998 0
1999 3
2000 9
2001 7
2002 18
2003 9
2004 9
2005 19
2006 17
2007 13
2008 9
2009 13
2010 23
2011 15
2012 7
2013 14
2014 9
2015 20
2016 8
2017 21
2018 10
2019 12
2020 5
2021 11
2022 9
2023 4
2024 5
2025 10
Total 318
Download as CSV

John Rolfe publications per year - data summary

  • John Rolfe, a Economics and Finance scholar from Central Queensland University, has 318 publications recorded across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1991 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2010, with 23 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1991, 1993 and 1995, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 35 years in the span carry no publications at all (1992, 1994 and 1998).
  • The rate of publication averages 9.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.9 per year counting only the 32 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 39 publications, 12% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1991-2002: 46 publications (3.8 per year); 2003-2014: 157 publications (13.1 per year); 2015-2025: 115 publications (10.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

John Rolfe publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Rolfe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 257–261 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 261 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33 261
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

John Rolfe publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 42–46 to 521+ publications.
  • John Rolfe, a Economics and Finance scholar from Central Queensland University, records 261 publications - the 77th percentile of the discipline.
  • 77% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than John Rolfe, and about 23% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and John Rolfe ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 137–141 publications, holding 111 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 48% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 521 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

John Rolfe D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Rolfe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114 42
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

John Rolfe D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 72 ranges running from 30 to 101+ D-Index.
  • John Rolfe, a Economics and Finance scholar from Central Queensland University, records 42 D-Index - the 47th percentile of the discipline.
  • 47% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than John Rolfe, and about 53% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44 D-Index range, and John Rolfe ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 33 D-Index, holding 178 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

John Rolfe is affiliated with Central Queensland University in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, economics, econometrics, and agricultural and biological sciences. The main topics covered in their work include economic and environmental valuation, agriculture sustainability and environmental impact, water quality and pollution assessment, agricultural innovations and practices, environmental sustainability in business, organic food and agriculture, and water resources management and optimization.

Frequent publication venues for John Rolfe include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Ocean & Coastal Management
  • Food Quality and Preference
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Marine Pollution Bulletin

In collaboration, John Rolfe has worked often with the following coauthors:

  • Megan Star
  • Jeremy De Valck
  • Darshana Rajapaksa
  • Delwar Akbar
  • Nicole Flint

Their recent papers reflect a range of environmental and economic topics. Notable publications include:

  • "Guidance to Enhance the Validity and Credibility of Environmental Benefit Transfers" (2021) published in Environmental and Resource Economics
  • "From farm to fork: Is food tourism a sustainable form of economic development?" (2020) published in Economic Analysis and Policy
  • "Willingness to pay for a domestic food waste diversion policy option in regional Queensland, Australia" (2020) published in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "Can cooperative business models solve horizontal and vertical coordination challenges? A case study in the Australian pineapple industry" (2022) published in Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management
  • "Potential changes in the recreational use value for Coastal Bay of Plenty, New Zealand due to oil spills: A combined approach of the travel cost and contingent behaviour methods" (2022) published in Ocean & Coastal Management

Best Publications

  • Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation

    John Rolfe;Jeff Bennett;Jordan Louviere

  • Mining Developments and Social Impacts on Communities: Bowen Basin Case Studies

    Vanessa Petkova;Stewart Lockie;John Rolfe;Galina Ivanova

  • Attribute Causality in Environmental Choice Modelling

    Russell Blamey;Jeffrey Bennett;Jordan Louviere;Mark Morrison

  • Coal mining and the resource community cycle: A longitudinal assessment of the social impacts of the Coppabella coal mine

    Stewart Lockie;Maree Franettovich;Vanessa Petkova-Timmer;John Rolfe

  • A test of policy labels in environmental choice modelling studies

    Russell Blamey;Jeff W Bennett;Jordan Louviere;Mark Morrison

  • Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values - A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners

    Robert J. Johnston;John Rolfe;Randall S. Rosenberger;Roy Brouwer

  • Lessons from the Social and Economic Impacts of the Mining Boom in the Bowen Basin 2004-2006

    John Rolfe;Bob Miles;Stewart Lockie;Galina Ivanova

  • The value of recreational fishing in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: A pooled revealed preference and contingent behaviour model

    Prabha Prayaga;John Rolfe;Natalie Stoeckl

  • Choice certainty and consistency in repeated choice experiments

    Roy Brouwer;Thijs Dekker;John Rolfe;Jill Windle

  • The impact of offering two versus three alternatives in choice modelling experiments

    John Rolfe;Jeff Bennett

  • Valuing the Protection of Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Sites

    John Rolfe;Jill Windle

  • Stated values and reminders of substitute goods: Testing for framing effects with choice modelling

    John Rolfe;Jeff Bennett;Jordan Louviere

  • Estimating Values for Recreational Fishing at Freshwater Dams in Queensland

    John Rolfe;Prabha Prayaga

  • Signal strength and climate relationships in 13C/12C ratios of tree ring cellulose from oak in southwest Finland

    I. Robertson;J. Rolfe;V. R. Switsur;A. H. C. Carter

  • Comparing Responses from Internet and Paper-Based Collection Methods in more Complex Stated Preference Environmental Valuation Surveys

    Jill Windle;John Rolfe

  • Democratisation versus engagement? Social and economic impact assessment and community participation in the coal mining industry of the Bowen Basin, Australia

    Stewart Lockie;Maree Franetovich;Sanjay Sharma;John Rolfe

  • Distance Decay Functions for Iconic Assets: Assessing National Values to Protect the Health of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia

    John Rolfe;Jill Windle

  • Adapting auctions for the provision of ecosystem services at the landscape scale

    Andrew F. Reeson;Andrew F. Reeson;Luis C. Rodriguez;Stuart M. Whitten;Kristen Williams

  • Diversification choices in agriculture: a Choice Modelling case study of sugarcane growers

    Jill Windle;John Rolfe

  • Assessing social and economic impacts associated with changes in the coal mining industry in the Bowen Basin, Queensland, Australia

    Galina Ivanova;John Rolfe;Stewart Lockie;Vanessa Timmer

  • 2017 Scientific Consensus Statement: land use impacts on the Great Barrier Reef water quality and ecosystem condition

    Jane Waterhouse;Britta Schaffelke;Rebecca Bartley;Rachel Eberhard

Frequent Co-Authors

Roy Brouwer
Roy Brouwer University of Waterloo
Stewart Lockie
Stewart Lockie James Cook University
Jordan J. Louviere
Jordan J. Louviere University of South Australia
Robert J. Johnston
Robert J. Johnston Clark University
Shirley Gregor
Shirley Gregor Australian National University
Mark Morrison
Mark Morrison University of Queensland
Michael Burton
Michael Burton University of Western Australia
Peter C. Boxall
Peter C. Boxall University of Alberta
David J. Pannell
David J. Pannell University of Western Australia
David J. Midmore
David J. Midmore Central Queensland University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Economics and Finance opens up diverse career possibilities. Today, students can how to get a business degree online, offering the flexibility to study while balancing work and personal commitments.

Interested in advancing your qualifications? Consider pursuing an online mba no gmat required, removing a common barrier to business graduate programs and making them more accessible than ever.

For cost-conscious students, there are also best mba programs under 30k, allowing you to gain a respected degree without overwhelming financial commitments. This makes an advanced education in Economics, Finance, or Business more attainable.

In addition, modern industries value digital expertise. A social media marketing bachelor’s degree online can complement economics or finance knowledge and broaden your career options in marketing, analytics, or digital strategy. Choose the path that matches your aspirations in today’s dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing John Rolfe

Trending Scientists