command api question
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@mvista.com
Tue Apr 2 11:25:00 GMT 2002
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:22:36PM -0500, Kris Warkentin wrote:
> Is that an agreeable solution? Or would it be better to just provide
> get/set functions? We're hoping to get our changes rolled into the gdb head
> branch someday and we want to keep things as clean as possible. (ie. as few
> changes as possible to common files, most stuff implemented in separate qnx
> files).
Well, I also have a solib search path patch that I'd like to get rolled
in. It's not in an appropriate form right now though. And I think
there was a third in the list archives over a year ago, that met with
some opposition.
I'd really like to see the search path become (at least) compile-time
default configurable...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
More information about the Gdb
mailing list