HOWTO move a target from old style multiarched to new style multiarched?

[Andrew Cagney]

> Hi,
> 
> there were a lot of changes in the last couple of months to convert gdb
> to a new way of doing things.  That's probably good but I don't know how
> many people actually understand the whole process.  I must admit, I don't.

This was my most recent guess:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-05/msg00399.html
Briefly, slow eliminate each set_gdbarch_deprecated* call, the rest will 
follow.

> I'm under the impression the documentation is missing an important part.
> There's some sort of description spread over the source code now but it
> doesn't give a coherent picture and I also didn't find that in the docs.

There isn't a single picture as there isn't a single change.  Instead 
there are three largely independant changes:

- frames (the obvious one)
- inferior function calls
- global buffer -> regcache or frame

> Wouldn't it be possible to write a HOWTO for the poor developer soul,
> who's left behind with a target with now using 80% deprecated functions?
> IMHO, that HOWTO written by somebody who knows what's going on could
> tells us

To speak personally, I think it is dangerous for someone to post a HOWTO 
on something they haven't done :-/  I, for instance, have only done the 
d10v and there my only recommendation is to not follow my lead.  I have 
posted several theoretical guidelines but there, it's strictly 
conjecture, and the suggestions haven't received any feedback.

Contrast this to multi-arch where the process was documented after I'd 
done several [partial] multi-arch conversions -> I knew it worked.

Anyway, here is an expansion of the last post:

for method in set_gdbarch_deprecated* do
   look in gdbarch.sh to see if there is a direct replacement
   ex: UNWIND_SP is a direct replacement for TARGET_READ_SP
   look in the d10v for an example
(this should be pretty obvious, replace A with B)

for method in set_gdbarch_deprecated* do
   look in gdbarch.sh to see if it is a dummy-frame related function
   ex: The dummy call frame SP should be set by push_dummy_call
   ex: This is simply not needed. ...
   move, implement, or delete the relevant code

cut a USER_CPU_frame branch
- implement a traditional unwinder so that the basics are working
- implement additional unwinders for sigtramps and the like
- replace the lot

But remember, I don't know if this process works, I've not tried it.

As for doco, the bit I acknowledge is missing is an architectural 
overview of the frame code.  The regcache does have posted doco:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2002-07/msg00202.html

Andrew


>   The datastructure `struct bits' is replaced by `struct pieces'.
>   This requires to use a new set of functions...
> 
>   Create functions foo(), bar() and baz(), doing...
> 
>   If you use function new_and_shiny() you must also replace
>   old_and_dirty(), otherwise...
> 
>   The functions old() and cruft() are replaced by glitter() which
>   returns yadda...
> 
>   Function ugly() is not used anymore and can be removed without
>   substitution...
> 
> and so on.  That would be very helpful and probably speed up the
> conversion of targets to "new style" enormously.
> 
> Or did I just miss the documentation on this?
> 
> Corinna
> 
> -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Developer Red Hat, Inc. mailto:vinschen@redhat.com