gdb/dwarf-frame.c

[Roland McGrath]

> My understanding from Mark's earlier post is that it is an intentional
> but probably temporary omission - since dwarf-frame is only a week or
> two old at this point.

I want it all and I want it now, dammit!  No, wait, wrong attitude module.
That's what I was hoping to hear.  Perhaps I can lend a hand to speed up
the process of implementing the rest of it.

> Should any work even be necessary?  My understanding was that the
> kernel code would show up in the shared library list.  Oh, I guess it
> is - we usually locate .eh_frame via BFD, which means section headers
> and an on-disk file.  I see.

Indeedy.


Thanks,
Roland