Identifying bottom-of-stack

Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org
Wed Aug 4 17:17:00 GMT 2004


On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 12:00:50PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> In the multi-threaded case, GDB's having fun identifying the outer-most 
> (oldest) frame and, unfortunatly, has this habit of backtracing past it :-/
> 
> Does anyone see a problem with:
> 
> - GLIBC marking those outermost frames with CFI indicating that both the 
> CFA and the RA are "unknown"?
> 
> - GDB's CFI unwinder recognizing this and returning a NULL frame ID (gdb 
> doesn't unwind _past_ such a frame).
> 
> I think this would give us a portable way of terminating the stack.
> 
> comments?

This would make debugging in the outermost frame quite annoying,
wouldn't it?  We won't be able to find any frame relative variables.

I realize users rarely need to do this, but if we're going to design a
solution it should take this into account.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz



More information about the Gdb mailing list