GDB 6.5.90 available for testing (GDB 6.6 pre-release)

[Markus Deuling]

Hi Mark,

Mark Kettenis schrieb:
>>  Here's the patch I've been using for this.  It'd be better to rework
>>  the way those functions use those obstacks, but...
>>
>>  2006-12-05  Jim Blandy  <jimb@codesourcery.com>
>>
>>        * cp-valprint.c (cp_print_value_fields, cp_print_value):
>>        Initialize tmp_obstack, to avoid warnings.
>>        * p-valprint.c (pascal_object_print_value_fields)
>>        (pascal_object_print_value): Same.
> 
> This is silly, at least if they are really unecessary.  It's a bug in GCC
> and should be fixed.  I mean, GCC should get better at detecting this sort
> of things; not give more false positives.
> 
> Markus, can you file a GCC bug report for this?

I opened a GCC bugzilla:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30086


Regards,
Markus

-- 
Markus Deuling
GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE
deuling@de.ibm.com