Nextrope’s cover photo
Nextrope

Nextrope

Technology, Information and Internet

Gdynia, Poland 1,102 followers

Digital asset infrastructure (EVM & XRPL): tokenization, stablecoin payments, DeFi, and ops-ready delivery

About us

Nextrope is a boutique engineering studio building digital asset infrastructure for fintechs and product teams. We deliver production systems on EVM and Ripple (XRPL) from smart contracts to backend services, indexing, and operations. Blockchain systems don’t fail because of code alone. They fail at integrations, data flows, and day-2 operations. That’s where we focus: making tokenization, stablecoin/payment flows, and DeFi products reliable under real usage. What we do: - Smart contract engineering (Solidity/EVM, XRPL flows) - Backend services and integrations (wallets, KYC/KYB, exchanges, internal systems) - Indexing, data pipelines, and reporting foundations - Production support: monitoring, incident response, upgrades, runbooks - Applied AI (selective): We also ship AI/RAG systems when they directly reduce ops cost or speed up delivery — e.g., internal knowledge assistants, workflow automation, and evaluation/guardrails for production use. If you need an ops-ready build, not a demo, we can scope a clear path to production in a short call.

Website
http://nextrope.com
Industry
Technology, Information and Internet
Company size
11-50 employees
Headquarters
Gdynia, Poland
Type
Privately Held
Founded
2018
Specialties
digital assets infrastructure, ai rag, evm, ripple, stablecoin flows, tokenization, and web3

Locations

Employees at Nextrope

Updates

  • View organization page for Nextrope

    1,102 followers

    Public benchmarks matter more than private demos. That’s why our AI security agent is now live on AgentArena, Nethermind’s benchmarking platform for autonomous agents working on real smart contract security tasks. Instead of a one-time report, our agent runs continuously alongside development, generating security evidence throughout the lifecycle. Think of it as an always-on pre-screening layer, working alongside your existing audits, not replacing them. First accepted findings are in: 1 Medium and 1 Low severity. Early days, tracked in the open on a public leaderboard, and we expect that number to grow. As more teams ship AI agents into security workflows, an open and comparable way to evaluate them, like AgentArena provides, is what separates genuinely useful tools from marketing. We’re building our track record in public one benchmark, one finding, and one iteration at a time. #Web3Security #AI #Nethermind #AgentArena #SmartContracts

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • How do you find an engineer who actually gets MEV, ZK rollups AND AI agents? You don't. They find you. Welcoming Szczepan Gurgul to Nextrope. → MSc Informatics, University of Zürich → Master's thesis: AI Agents for MEV Extraction on L2 Rollups → Co-author of "Scaling DeFi with ZK Rollups" (arXiv, presented at BCK24 Zurich) → BCK25 speaker in Mumbai → BCOLN Best dApp 2024 winner Big one for us. Glad to have you, Szczepan 🚀

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • View organization page for Nextrope

    1,102 followers

    💼 SEPA Instant changed the speed of European payments. One of the most significant developments since then is just taking shape. Stablecoins are quietly transitioning from speculation into the core of banking. The total market volume has already surpassed $310 billion, with USDC growing by hundreds of percent after Circle’s successful EMI authorization. Following a detailed analysis of the GENIUS Act and MiCA, the regulatory requirements are clear and non-negotiable: ❎ 1:1 backing reserve ❎ segregated custody ❎ instant redemption ❎ comprehensive AML/KYC and Travel Rule (TFR) Most substantial technical challenges lie well above the smart contract layer. Here are the five critical layers of stablecoin architecture that every bank must address when planning a production-grade implementation, whether issuing its own stablecoins or integrating those from partners such as USDC, EURC, or RLUSD. The entire stack ultimately rests on a robust reserve management. Payment rails & settlement (routing, on/off-chain reconciliation, and treasury management) consume the vast majority of engineering effort. In our experience, it accounts for the bulk of the technical team’s time. For practical recommendations on what to build in-house versus what is more efficient to integrate, see the full analysis: → Link in the first comment

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • RWA-backed stablecoins have yet to become operational in DeFi. You can’t use them as collateral. You can’t earn yield on them through lending. You can’t freely trade them on the open market. This isn’t purely a regulatory issue, but rather a challenge to on-chain architecture. The graphic below shows the infrastructure layer required to close this gap. For teams building RWA platforms in 2026, this is one of the decisive factors determining whether your product stays a regulated token or achieves full composability with DeFi.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Our founder Mateusz Mach is heading to XRPL Zone Paris to facilitate the Lending & Credit working group as part of the Soil team. Native lending on XRPL is one of the spaces we're most excited about at Nextrope. 🗓 April 14 · Paris

    Next week I'm in Paris for XRPL Zone, facilitating the Lending & Credit working group together with Michal Maciuk We'll be leading a structured session on what native lending and credit looks like on XRPL today, what's missing, and where the biggest opportunities are. Think XLS-65, XLS-66 amendments, on-ledger credit lines, and how protocols like Soil are actually building on top of these primitives. If you're working on anything touching lending, credit markets, or DeFi infrastructure on XRPL, this is the room to be in. 🗓 April 14 · XRPL Commons HQ, Paris Apply to attend 👇 https://luma.com/780xhfr7 Thanks for the invite Odelia Torteman & XRPL Commons - see you there!

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • The fundamental architectural distinctions in tokenizing treasuries, private credit, real estate, commodities, and institutional funds remain largely confined behind KYC walls, rendering the vast majority unable to interact with DeFi. We reveal why each asset class demands a distinctly engineered infrastructure stack, and the precise points at which most platforms ultimately falter in production. Full breakdown with granular data, architecture patterns and production-grade engineering specifications:  → Link in the first comment

  • The choice that could cost you a 6-month rebuild. Swipe through the carousel for a direct head-to-head comparison, from on-chain MiCA compliance and gas costs, through multi-class instruments, all the way to real-world use cases at banks and regulated platforms.

  • 🎯 Most tokenization platforms fail at the exact same 6 points. Here’s the architecture that actually works in production. Swipe through the carousel to see: • The 6 subsystems every serious platform needs (most skip 2-3) • Why payment reconciliation (and not the smart contract) eats 80% of engineering time • ERC-20 + hooks vs ERC-1400 vs ERC-3643 (T-REX) - clear decision framework • Build vs integrate strategy per layer If you're building one right now, what's your biggest technical challenge? → Comment below.

  • 📆 RWA Tokenization: MiCA + TFR + MiFID II – what changes in 2026? MiCA introduces stricter requirements for tokens classified as financial instruments. Combined with TFR (Travel Rule) and MiFID II obligations, on-chain enforcement proves particularly advantageous. Which standard fits best? Decision map in ~3 minutes: → ERC-1400 →   For multi-tranche structures (senior/junior debt, vesting, lock-ups) and on-chain document management. Ideal for structured products and jurisdictions with moderate regulatory demands. → ERC-3643 (T-REX) →   Native, atomic on-chain compliance enforcement, full ERC-20 compatibility, optimised gas costs, ready for public Ethereum under MiCA. → Hybrid approach →  ERC-1400 structure combined with the ERC-3643 identity and compliance layer. It delivers both partition flexibility and robust on-chain compliance. Full comparison here: https://lnkd.in/dkH7R5ja

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • In 2026, most companies should NOT build a tokenization platform from scratch. And that’s a rational decision. Tokenization is no longer about minting. It’s about architecture, compliance, and operations. The real stack includes: • Asset model & lifecycle design • Smart contracts & upgrade logic • Banking / KYC integrations • MiCA-ready reporting • Production support & SLA ownership Most teams underestimate the upper layers. That’s where platforms break. We mapped the full architecture here: https://lnkd.in/dFV-N6S4

    • No alternative text description for this image

Similar pages