Diverse tech teams outperform homogeneous ones. The most common objection is that diversity hiring means compromising on quality. It does not. The bar does not lower. The pipeline gets wider. Six things that actually move it: 1. Fix the job description first. Culture fit, unnecessary degree requirements, you are filtering people out before they apply. 2. Expand where you source. Same universities, same boards, same referral networks, same hires. 3. Structure your interviews. Consistent questions, clear criteria, diverse panels. 4. Hire for culture add, not culture fit. What does this person bring that we do not already have? 5. Focus on retention as much as hiring. Diverse hiring without inclusive culture is a revolving door. 6. Track the data at every stage. Where the drop off is, that is where the bias lives. Fix the stage, not the candidate. What has your company done to build a more diverse engineering team? Drop it in the comments 👇 Swipe through the carousel for the full breakdown. #TechHiring #DiversityInTech #EngineeringLeadership #Recruitment #Hiring
6 Ways to Build a More Diverse Engineering Team Without Compromising Quality
More Relevant Posts
-
The strongest technology professionals are becoming more selective about the opportunities they explore. If you're looking to attract passive technology talent, understanding what motivates a career move is a great place to start. Discover what today's professionals are prioritizing and what it means for your hiring strategy: https://lnkd.in/emE_pHUK #TechnologyHiring #TechRecruitment #HiringStrategy #HendersonScott
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The hardest part of Staff+ hiring? Knowing who is actually Staff+ before the interviews begin. A strong resume can show what someone has built. It doesn’t always show how they think, influence teams, make technical decisions, or operate at organizational scale. That’s what the CX Interview Pack evaluates before a candidate enters the client process. Previous scope. Technical ownership. Organizational influence. Decision-making. The goal is simple: less time screening for signal, more time deciding on the right person. 2 Weeks. 20 Relevant Staff+ Profiles. 2 Target Offers. Hiring for Staff, Principal or L6+ engineering talent? Write to Staff+@Careerxperts.com. #Hiring #Startups #StartupHiring #Tech #Technology #DeepTech #StaffEngineer #PrincipalEngineer #Leadership #Innovation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
There's a tendency in technical hiring to filter for experience first and potential second. We get it; senior talent feels like a safer bet. But some of the most impactful hires we've seen come from early-career #candidates who brought fresh perspectives, hunger to prove themselves, and the #adaptability that comes from not having years of "we've always done it this way" baked in. The best teams are built with a mix of experience and potential. Don't let a year count keep you from your next great hire. #TechTalent #HiringManagers #EarlyCareer #TechRecruitment #TechJobs Marcus Webster
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
What the best technical hires have in common — beyond the technical skills. After 20+ years in technical leadership and 4 years in talent, the pattern is consistent. The hires that transform teams don't just bring technical skill. They bring a specific kind of intellectual orientation. Curiosity that runs ahead of the job description. They're interested in problems adjacent to their formal scope. They ask questions about the business, the product, the customer — not just the system they've been assigned to work on. Comfort with uncertainty without paralysis. Complex technical environments have problems nobody knows the answer to. The hires that add the most value work through uncertainty productively instead of waiting for complete information that never arrives. Honesty about what they don't know. Not performed humility. Genuine, calibrated self-awareness about the edge of their current knowledge — which means you can trust their confidence as much as you can trust their uncertainty. A bias toward making things better rather than just making them work. The engineer who sees a process that's slightly broken and fixes it even though it wasn't their ticket. Not heroically — just habitually. These characteristics don't appear in most job descriptions. They're hard to assess in standard interviews. They're the difference between a hire that fills a seat and one that lifts a team. At Evolve eSolutions we look for all of it. No upfront fees. Direct employment by you. 📩 DM us or connect here. #TechHiring #TalentStrategy #EvolveESolutions #TalentAcquisition #EngineeringLeadership #Recruiting
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🔥 𝐇𝐢𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐇𝐨𝐭 𝐓𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 I wanted to try something a little different. No rehearsed answers. No polished talking points. No “it depends” corporate waffle. Just a few questions about hiring, answered raw and unfiltered by people actually doing it. First up: Wib Janko, Talent Acquisition Lead Engineering - JUPUS 👇 A few of the takes that stood out to me: 🤖 𝐀𝐈 𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐡𝐲𝐩𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠. Wib’s view? AI can do plenty behind the scenes, but the first interaction with a candidate should still be human. Particularly when you're hiring for niche or senior roles. ⚡ 𝐀𝐈 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐢𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬, 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐲. Wib has built AI-powered hiring playbooks, role information pages and feedback tools that have taken some processes down to 30 minutes. 👀 𝐂𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲'𝐫𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥. With fake applications and increasingly sophisticated fraud becoming a genuine issue, simply having the right skills on a CV isn't always enough anymore. Wib talks about the importance of having an online footprint and showing some personality. 🎯 𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐩 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝟐𝟎𝟎 𝐣𝐨𝐛𝐬. 10 genuinely thoughtful, targeted applications could be far more effective than hundreds of AI-assisted applications. 📈 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐡𝐢𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐬? 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐭 𝐢𝐬𝐧'𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐚𝐬 “𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐥𝐨𝐚𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬”. Some roles are easier to fill. Others, particularly senior and highly specialised technical positions, can be harder than ever. And perhaps my favourite line: “𝑊𝑒’𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑚 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑚.” There’s a lot to unpack here. This is exactly why I wanted to start Hiring Hot Takes, honest opinions from people working in Talent and Tech, without the usual filter. 🙏 Thanks to Wib for being the perfect person to kick it off. 🙌 #HiringHotTakes #TalentAcquisition #TechRecruitment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
A Good Hire Isn't Just a Skill Match One thing we’ve learned in technology hiring: A resume can tell you what someone has done. It can’t always tell you how they’ll work. Two candidates can have almost identical experience. Same years. Same tools. Similar projects. But one asks better questions. One communicates clearly when something goes wrong. One takes ownership instead of waiting for instructions. And one is genuinely curious about the problem they’re solving. Those things don't always show up on a resume. That’s why good hiring needs to go beyond keywords and job titles. Skills get someone into the conversation. Character, curiosity, and capability help build the team. At ScaleTech Global LLC, we believe the best matches happen when you look at the person behind the resume. People first. Technology always. ScaleTech Global LLC Scaling Talent. Powering Growth. #ScaleTechGlobal #Hiring #TechTalent #Recruitment #ITStaffing #TalentAcquisition #Technology #FutureOfWork #WorkforceSolution
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
FutureGig Hiring Lab 🔬 Problem: You're losing candidates to competing offers because your process is too slow. The average time-to-offer at SMBs is 4-6 weeks. The best candidates are off the market in 10 days. Do the math. Where the time goes: → Waiting for hiring manager availability to interview → Collecting feedback over multiple days → Getting offer approval through multiple layers → Writing the offer letter from scratch 3 fixes that work: 1. Block interview time before you post the role, not after 2. Require feedback within 24 hours using a scorecard 3. Pre-write the offer letter template so you're filling in a name and number, not starting from scratch Speed is a competitive advantage in hiring. The companies moving fastest aren't cutting corners. They're just more prepared. FutureGig Hiring Lab | Smarter hiring. Human-first. #Hiring #TalentAcquisition #SMBGrowth #HiringStrategy #HRLeaders
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
One thing I'm learning from recruiting exceptional engineers: The hardest part isn't finding them. It's getting their attention. For a typical search, we might identify 50–70 people who look potentially relevant. From there, we'll narrow that down to a small group of genuinely strong matches. Then we reach out to the five we believe are the best fit. And sometimes only one responds. That's something I've been thinking about a lot. Because the answer isn't necessarily to contact 50 more people. If the five best people are the right five, the real question becomes: Why aren't they responding? Are they unfamiliar with the recruiter? Does the message feel generic? Is the opportunity actually compelling? Or are we simply not giving enough context for someone who is already doing very well where they are? That's changed how I'm thinking about technical recruitment. The goal isn't to become the recruiter who sends the most messages. It's to become the recruiter exceptional engineers actually respond to. A response doesn't have to mean they're interested. “Not right now.” “Send me more information.” “I'm happy where I am.” Even “check back with me in six months.” Those are all conversations. And conversations are where good recruiting starts. That's the standard we're building toward at Remote AI Sourcing. Precision over volume. Every time. #TechnicalRecruitment #SoftwareEngineering #TechHiring #AITalent
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Stop buying into the myth. The idea that the 'best' candidate always wins is a comforting lie. It's rarely about pure merit anymore. It's about navigating a broken, often arbitrary system. You're not failing because you're not good enough. You're often filtered out for reasons completely detached from your actual capabilities. Invisible algorithms screen for keywords. 'Culture fit' becomes an excuse for homogeneity. The timing, the mood of a hiring manager, the sheer volume of applications – these are often more impactful than your exceptional skills. We built PistonJob to cut through the noise. But even with automation, we constantly see truly brilliant people get sidelined. Not for lack of skill, but for failing an invisible 'fit' matrix designed by algorithms, not humans. I know a founder, built multiple products from scratch, rejected from a senior role in minutes. Why? Their innovative resume format didn't match the ATS's 'ideal template.' Merit? Irrelevant. Wake up. The system isn't designed for merit. It's designed for predictability. And that's costing talent, and progress. #JobSearchTruth #MeritocracyMyth #HiringCrisis #SystemFailure #UnfilteredTalent #PistonJob #BeyondTheBots
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
More from this author
Explore related topics
- Building A Diverse Tech Team
- Ways To Improve Diversity In Job Descriptions
- How to Enhance Diversity in Hiring
- How to Foster Diversity in Tech Culture
- Building a Diverse Candidate Pipeline for Hiring
- Tips for Diversifying and Retaining High-Performing Teams
- Trends in Diversity and Inclusion in Engineering Hiring
- Tips for Shifting Hiring Practices to Foster Diversity
- Strategies for Addressing Bias in Tech
- How to Avoid Assumptions in Diversity Recruitment
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development
Great breakdown — point #6 especially resonates. Tracking drop-off by stage is exactly how you turn "we value diversity" into something measurable instead of a slogan. As a web developer, I've seen how structured interviews (point #3) also just make for better technical hires overall — clearer criteria means less room for unconscious bias to creep into "gut feeling" decisions. Would love to see how this plays out with your open web dev role — is the interview process structured the same way?