pgsql-hackers - May 2005

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)

Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next

May 1, 2005

Thread	Author	Time
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Robert Treat	01:34
pl/Python	James William Pye	01:37
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Robert Treat	01:40
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Robert Treat	01:59
Re: SPI bug.	Neil Conway	06:00
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Sander Steffann	10:00
Re: SPI bug. 📎	Neil Conway	11:54
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	12:09
Re: SPI bug.	Andrew - Supernews	12:40
Re: SPI bug.	Thomas Hallgren	13:49
Re: SPI bug.	Neil Conway	14:02
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Alvaro Herrera	14:25
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Peter Eisentraut	14:44
Re: SPI bug.	Thomas Hallgren	14:50
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Dennis Bjorklund	14:56
Re: SPI bug.	Tom Lane	15:29
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Tom Lane	15:37
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	16:34
Network write errors (was: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1)	Andrew - Supernews	16:39
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	16:57
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Dennis Bjorklund	17:35
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	18:17
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Christopher Browne	19:03
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Hannu Krosing	19:23
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Bruno Wolff III	19:35
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	20:30
custom guc vars	Andrew Dunstan	22:38
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Marc G. Fournier	23:58

May 2, 2005

Thread	Author	Time
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Marc G. Fournier	00:01
Re: SPI bug.	Neil Conway	00:40
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Christopher Browne	01:09
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Christopher Kings-Lynne	01:48
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Neil Conway	02:05
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Oliver Jowett	03:58
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Jaime Casanova	04:08
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Neil Conway	04:14
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Tom Lane	04:25
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Tom Lane	04:41
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Neil Conway	05:05
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Oliver Jowett	05:20
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Russell Smith	05:22
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Tom Lane	05:35
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Tom Lane	05:56
Re: SPI bug.	Thomas Hallgren	06:00
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Tom Lane	06:01
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Dennis Bjorklund	06:06
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Neil Conway	06:07
Re: SPI bug.	Thomas Hallgren	06:52
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Oliver Jowett	06:53
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Oliver Jowett	06:56
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Peter Eisentraut	08:11
Re: custom guc vars	Brent Verner	08:15
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Oliver Jowett	08:49
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	08:52
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	08:58
Using LDAP for authorization	Magnus Hagander	09:12
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	09:12
Re: custom guc vars	Thomas Hallgren	09:13
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	09:36
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	09:52
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	10:01
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Hannu Krosing	10:59
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	11:23
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	11:25
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Alvar Freude	11:32
Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several	Hannu Krosing	11:54
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	13:24
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Tom Lane	14:33
Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ?	Tom Lane	14:38
Re: Using LDAP for authorization	Stephen Frost	14:41
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift	Merlin Moncure	14:57
Re: SPI bug.	Tom Lane	14:59
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Dave Held	15:00
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Tom Lane	15:07
Re: SPI bug.	Thomas Hallgren	15:37
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift	Tom Lane	15:37
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Heikki Linnakangas	15:47
Citation for "Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?"	Gurmeet Manku	16:14
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Josh Berkus	16:48
Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several	Hannu Krosing	16:50
ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only.)	Hannu Krosing	16:53
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift	Merlin Moncure	17:12
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Bruce Momjian	17:14
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Bruce Momjian	17:17
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	17:20
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Marc G. Fournier	17:22
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift	Alvaro Herrera	17:23
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Bruce Momjian	17:28
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift	Tom Lane	17:30
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Joshua D. Drake	17:32
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Dave Held	17:39
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Joshua D. Drake	17:46
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Bruce Momjian	17:47
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift	Merlin Moncure	17:53
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Dave Held	17:54
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Bruce Momjian	17:55
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Joshua D. Drake	17:56
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Bruce Momjian	17:59
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Marc G. Fournier	18:12
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift	Merlin Moncure	18:12
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Bruce Momjian	18:13
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Bruce Momjian	18:14
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement	Josh Berkus	18:20
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Andrew - Supernews	18:26
Re: Cleaning up unreferenced table files	Bruce Momjian	18:30
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased	Marc G. Fournier	18:35
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift	Tom Lane	18:37
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Marc G. Fournier	18:38
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased	Joshua D. Drake	18:40
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Bruce Momjian	18:42
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement	Dave Held	18:43
PostgreSQL Guru needed: $70K - $80K year!!	PeterS	18:47
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement	Josh Berkus	18:49
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement	Tom Lane	18:50
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Marc G. Fournier	18:52
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Bruce Momjian	18:54
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Joshua D. Drake	19:00
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Marc G. Fournier	19:04
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Joshua D. Drake	19:05
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company	Andrew Dunstan	19:06
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Tom Lane	19:12
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement	Josh Berkus	19:13
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Marc G. Fournier	19:14
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Joshua D. Drake	19:19
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Chris Travers	19:21
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company	Bruce Momjian	19:22
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Bruce Momjian	19:24
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Dann Corbit	19:25
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Bruce Momjian	19:25
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement	Robert Treat	19:28
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Rob Butler	19:29
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Marc G. Fournier	19:31
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Bruce Momjian	19:51
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Andrew - Supernews	19:53
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company	Bruce Momjian	19:57
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Marc G. Fournier	20:00
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Bruno Wolff III	20:05
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Joshua D. Drake	20:05
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Bruce Momjian	20:08
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Joshua D. Drake	20:12
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Marc G. Fournier	20:14
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Tom Lane	20:15
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Tom Lane	20:16
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Jim C. Nasby	20:20
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Andrew Dunstan	20:27
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company	Bruce Momjian	20:33
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift	Merlin Moncure	20:34
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Alvaro Herrera	20:36
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	adnandursun	20:38
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Ron Mayer	20:39
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Joshua D. Drake	20:40
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift	Jim C. Nasby	20:42
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift	Alvaro Herrera	20:43
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift	Jim C. Nasby	20:47
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Andrew Dunstan	20:53
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Alvar Freude	20:56
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company	Rosser Schwarz	20:58
Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only.)	Jim C. Nasby	20:59
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Hannu Krosing	21:00
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company	Rosser Schwarz	21:01
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Jim C. Nasby	21:02
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Jim C. Nasby	21:05
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Andrew Dunstan	21:10
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement	Dave Held	21:32
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Oliver Jowett	21:35
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Oliver Jowett	21:51
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement	Dave Held	21:56
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Chuck McDevitt	21:56
Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only.)	Jochem van Dieten	21:59
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Kris Jurka	22:03
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Oliver Jowett	22:05
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Chuck McDevitt	22:13
Heads up: impending 8.0, 7.4, 7.3 releases	Tom Lane	23:22
Re: Heads up: impending 8.0, 7.4, 7.3 releases	Joshua D. Drake	23:33

May 3, 2005

Thread	Author	Time
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement	Robert Treat	00:02
Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement	Andrew Dunstan	00:04
Re: SPI bug.	Neil Conway	01:02
Implement support for TCP_KEEPCNT, TCP_KEEPIDLE, TCP_KEEPINTVL (was Re: [HACKERS] Feature freeze date for 8.1) 📎	Oliver Jowett	01:49
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift	Tom Lane	02:43
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Neil Conway	03:03
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement	Pavel Stehule	06:23
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Michael Paesold	06:41
BTW, if anyone wants to work on it...	Tom Lane	06:45
Re: SPI bug.	Thomas Hallgren	07:35
bitmap scan and explain analyze	Tatsuo Ishii	09:11
distributed database	mohammad izwan ibrahim	09:18
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Dawid Kuroczko	09:46
Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only	Hannu Krosing	09:56
Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only	Hannu Krosing	10:10
Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only	Hannu Krosing	10:12
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Peter Eisentraut	10:46
Re: BTW, if anyone wants to work on it... 📎	Magnus Hagander	10:55
Regression tests	=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=	13:00
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?	Markus Schaber	13:06
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Stephen Frost	13:38
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift	Merlin Moncure	14:22
Re: Regression tests	Christopher Kings-Lynne	14:27
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1	Tom Lane	14:31
Re: bitmap scan and explain analyze	Tom Lane	14:37
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement	Tom Lane	14:43

Browse Archives

Prev | Next